<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; copyright infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ISPs don&#8217;t have to give up names in civil cases</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[P2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-ruling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news that European Internet Service Providers did not have to give up names of customers to members of the Music Industry and other organizations in civil cases hit the Internet by storm. Everyone seemed to think that this was a major victory for consumer rights. It probably is in some countries but let me explain how this is easily circumvented, at least in Germany.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that European Internet Service Providers did not have to give up names of customers to members of the Music Industry and other organizations in civil cases <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/01/29/2025257.shtml">hit</a> the Internet by storm. Everyone seemed to think that this was a major victory for consumer rights. It probably is in some countries but let me explain how this is easily circumvented, at least in Germany.</p>
<p>German Internet Service Providers did not give out their customer names in civil cases even before the ruling of the EU court. Copyright infringement is however a criminal offense in Germany which means that the companies file a criminal lawsuit, the State is investigation, getting information about the IP in question and the companies simply take a look into the documents to find out the real name and contact information about that person.</p>
<p>After they get the name they file a civil case and the criminal lawsuit is normally closed because of minor offenses. With the name however they can &#8211; and do &#8211; sue the user whose IP they detected.</p>
<p><span id="more-3038"></span>Is copyright infringement a civil or criminal offense in your country ?</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/copyright-infringement/" title="copyright infringement" rel="tag">copyright infringement</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/court-ruling/" title="court-ruling" rel="tag">court-ruling</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/p2p/" title="P2p" rel="tag">P2p</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/" title="Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement (January 29, 2008)">Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/08/youtorrent/" title="Youtorrent (January 8, 2008)">Youtorrent</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/09/why-some-isps-turn-against-their-own-customers/" title="Why some ISPs turn against their own customers (June 9, 2008)">Why some ISPs turn against their own customers</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/why-i-wont-be-using-qtrax/" title="Why I wont be using Qtrax (January 29, 2008)">Why I wont be using Qtrax</a> (7)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/26/what%e2%80%99s-your-take-on-downloading/" title="What’s Your Take on Downloading? (March 26, 2008)">What’s Your Take on Downloading?</a> (17)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viacom sends takedown notice to author of video clip</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/31/viacom-sends-takedown-notice-to-author-of-video-clip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/31/viacom-sends-takedown-notice-to-author-of-video-clip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takedown notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/31/viacom-sends-takedown-notice-to-author-of-video-clip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following story is to good to just pass a long. Imagine you create a video and upload it to Youtube. You do get some exposure and someday you realize that a tv show, in this case Web Junk 2.0 on VH1, played your video on their show without asking for your permission in first place. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following story is to good to just pass a long. Imagine you create a video and upload it to Youtube. You do get some exposure and someday you realize that a tv show, in this case Web Junk 2.0 on VH1, played your video on their show without asking for your permission in first place. </p>
<p>You then decide to get a copy of that part of the show and publish it on Youtube again to be able to comment on it on your own blog. Guess what happens next ? Right, you get a takedown notice by the guys who took your video in first place without authorization.</p>
<p>Common sense tells me that this is wrong. I&#8217;m not a lawyer though and it might be a perfectly clear case but it sounds wrong. You do  give Youtube the (non-exclusive) right to redistribute the videos without asking for your permission and it could be possible that Youtube has a deal with Viacom in place that allows them to pick videos for their show.</p>
<p><span id="more-1938"></span>It could be. It still sounds wrong though. Below is the original clip, the other video was taken down unfortunately.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nLi5B0Iefsk"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nLi5B0Iefsk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Read More:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://theknightshift.blogspot.com/2007/08/viacom-hits-me-with-copyright.html">The Knight Shift</a></p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/copyright-infringement/" title="copyright infringement" rel="tag">copyright infringement</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/takedown-notice/" title="takedown notice" rel="tag">takedown notice</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/viacom/" title="viacom" rel="tag">viacom</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/youtube/" title="youtube" rel="tag">youtube</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/03/judge-orders-google-to-hand-over-youtube-user-data-to-viacom/" title="Judge orders Google to hand over Youtube User Data to Viacom (July 3, 2008)">Judge orders Google to hand over Youtube User Data to Viacom</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/24/youtube-enhance-youtube-experience/" title="Youtube: Enhance Youtube Experience (April 24, 2009)">Youtube: Enhance Youtube Experience</a> (11)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/18/youtube-videos-playback-problems-and-fixes/" title="Youtube Videos: Playback Problems And Fixes (November 18, 2009)">Youtube Videos: Playback Problems And Fixes</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/28/youtube-videos-downloader-tubequeue/" title="Youtube Videos Downloader TubeQueue (July 28, 2009)">Youtube Videos Downloader TubeQueue</a> (17)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/01/youtube-video-search-is-a-barebone-youtube-downloader/" title="Youtube Video Search Is A Barebone Youtube Downloader (September 1, 2009)">Youtube Video Search Is A Barebone Youtube Downloader</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/31/viacom-sends-takedown-notice-to-author-of-video-clip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
