<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; browser benchmark</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/browser-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Web Browser Benchmark Results Comparison</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/03/17/web-browser-benchmark-results-comparison/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/03/17/web-browser-benchmark-results-comparison/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:27:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[acid3]]></category> <category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[browser benchmark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[html5 test]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sunspider]]></category> <category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=42629</guid> <description><![CDATA[I compared web browser benchmark results back in 2008. Illustrious browsers such as Google Chrome 1, Firefox 3.1, Internet Explorer 8 beta 2 or Opera 10 alpha were tested and compared. The results from back then are history, with the majority of tested web browser versions no longer available. Google for instance has recently released [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I compared <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/14/web-browser-benchmark-comparison/">web browser benchmark</a> results back in 2008. Illustrious browsers such as Google Chrome 1, Firefox 3.1, Internet Explorer 8 beta 2 or Opera 10 alpha were tested and compared. The results from back then are history, with the majority of tested web browser versions no longer available. Google for instance has recently released version 12 of the Chrome browser, Mozilla is closing in on Firefox 4 (which will apparently be released on March 22), Microsoft just released Internet Explorer 9 and Opera the first beta of Opera 11.10.</p><p>Time for a now Internet browser benchmark comparison. All benchmarks are run on a 64-bit Windows 7 Professional PC with an Intel Core i7 860 Ghz cpu, 8 Gigabytes of RAM and a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 display adapter.</p><p>The following browsers have been included in the benchmark comparison:</p><ul><li><a
href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Firefox 3.6.15</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/RC/?WT.mc_id=hp_1&#038;WT.mc_ev=click">Firefox 4 RC</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">Google Chrome 11.0.696.12 Dev</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">Google Chrome 12.0.705.0 Canary</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.opera.com/">Opera 11.01</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.opera.com/browser/next/">Opera 11.10 Beta</a></li><li><a
href="http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/internet-explorer/products/ie/home">Internet Explorer 9</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/">Safari 5.0.4</a></li></ul><p>The following benchmarks have been utilized:</p><ul><li><a
href="http://html5test.com/">HTML5 Test</a></li><li><a
href="http://acid3.acidtests.org/">Acid 3 Test</a></li><li><a
href="http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html">Sunspider</a> JavaScript Benchmark</li><li><a
href="http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/FishIETank/Default.html">Fish IE Tank</a></li></ul><h3>Results</h3><p>Both Google Chrome versions are leading the HTML5 test. They are the only browser that reach a score higher than 300 on the test. Internet Explorer 9 and Firefox 3.6.15 bring up the rear with scores below 200 points.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/html5-test.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/html5-test.png" alt="html5 test" title="html5 test" width="482" height="290" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-42632" /></a></p><p>The three browsers Safari, Google Chrome 12 and Opera 11.10 Beta manage to score 100 out of 100 points in the Acid 3 test. The remaining browsers all score more than 90 points, with Firefox 3.6.15 bringing up the rear with 94 points. It is a little surprising that the current Dev version of Google Chrome scores 96 points.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/acid3-test-benchmark.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/acid3-test-benchmark.png" alt="acid3 test benchmark" title="acid3 test benchmark" width="487" height="291" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-42633" /></a></p><p>Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer 9 scores the best result in the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark. It took the browser 196.9 ms to complete the benchmark. Firefox 4 RC, Google Chrome and the Opera browsers all completed the benchmark in less than 235 milliseconds. Only Apple&#8217;s Safari with more than 300ms and Firefox 3.6.15 with more than 650ms scored considerably worse in the benchmark.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sunspider-benchmark.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/sunspider-benchmark.png" alt="sunspider benchmark" title="sunspider benchmark" width="481" height="294" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-42634" /></a></p><p>The last benchmark, Microsoft&#8217;s IE Fishtank, benefits highly from hardware acceleration. All browsers with hardware acceleration ran the demonstration in 35 fps or more, with Internet Explorer 9 reaching the maximum of 60 fps.</p><p>Firefox 3, Opera 11 and Safari do not utilize hardware acceleration yet which explains the mediocre score of 2 respectively 3 fps in the benchmark. Opera Software did however release a special build of the browser not long ago that supports hardware acceleration. The test ran in 60fps in that version of the Opera web browser (see <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2011/03/01/opera-hardware-acceleration-demo-is-blazingly-fast/">Opera Hardware Acceleration Demo Is Blazingly Fast</a>).</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ie-fish-tank.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ie-fish-tank.png" alt="ie fish tank" title="ie fish tank" width="485" height="290" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-42635" /></a></p><p>And here are all results in one chart. Red values indicate the lowest test result, green the highest.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/web-browser-benchmark-comparison.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/web-browser-benchmark-comparison-550x168.png" alt="web browser benchmark comparison" title="web browser benchmark comparison" width="550" height="168" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-42636" /></a></p><p>Click on the screenshot to see it in its original size.</p><h3>Closing Words</h3><p>Benchmarks are not everything, especially since all companies and developers have improved the speed and web standards support of their browsers significantly. Some of the benchmarks may increase in importance over time, the HTML5 benchmark for instance or the Fish Tank demo that benefits from hardware acceleration. They become more relevant when websites start implementing technologies on their websites that make use of those features.</p><p>Internet Explorer 9 and Google Chrome have the best scores in two of the four different benchmarks. The browser with the worst scoring is Firefox 3.6.15 which will soon be replaced on many systems with the upcoming Firefox 4 which scored significantly better in most benchmarks.</p><p>All browsers have improved significantly when looking back at the test results of the benchmarking test in 2008. Both Google Chrome and Firefox were the two only browsers that completed the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark in less than 1000ms. That&#8217;s almost five times as much as today&#8217;s browsers need.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/03/17/web-browser-benchmark-results-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>12</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Internet Browser Benchmark PeaceKeeper</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:50:30 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[browser benchmark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[futuremark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet browser]]></category> <category><![CDATA[peacekeeper]]></category> <category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Benchmarks can be an appropriate method of comparing different products against each other. Internet browser benchmarks usually calculate the processing speed of web browsers using JavaScript. This method is a good indicator of the speed of a web browser. It fails however to test other important factors like usability, security or correct code interpretations. A [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/futuremark.jpeg" alt="futuremark" title="futuremark" width="128" height="99" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12557" />Benchmarks can be an appropriate method of comparing different products against each other. Internet browser benchmarks usually calculate the processing speed of web browsers using JavaScript. This method is a good indicator of the speed of a web browser. It fails however to test other important factors like usability, security or correct code interpretations. A browser that excels in JavaScript calculations and executions does not therefor need to be the best in other areas. Still, a speedy Internet browser is something that most users desire and strive after.</p><p><span
id="more-12559"></span>Peacekeeper is a new Internet browser benchmark by Futuremark which are probably best known for their video graphics benchmarks 3DMark and PCMark. The benchmark is compatible will all web browsers that support Java and JavaScript. It will extract general information from the computer system including its cpu, computer memory and operating system before starting the benchmark.</p><p>The benchmark itself is a series of tests that are conducted in the same browser window. The result is displayed in the end which would not make that much sense unless there would be some sort of comparison available. Probably the most interesting aspect of the Internet browser benchmark is the chart in the end that is displaying the performance of several web browsers when run on four different computer systems.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/internet_browser-500x318.jpg" alt="internet browser" title="internet browser" width="500" height="318" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-12558" /></p><p>The chart displays the performance of ten web browsers, including both final versions like Internet Explorer 8 or Safari 4 and beta versions like Opera 10 or Firefox 3.1b3, on four different computer systems. Two Intel computer systems running the Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E8400 and Intel Core i7 Processor 920 plus two AMD systems running the AMD Athlon 64 3800+ and AMD Phenom II X4 940. It is therefor possible to analyse the performance of a web browser running on a local computer system with those run by other users who took the benchmark.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
