<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; bob quick</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/bob-quick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>UK. Sensitive Information. Need We Say More?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bob quick]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data leak]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[information]]></category> <category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/</guid> <description><![CDATA[The massive increase in data collection throughout the world has not led to responsible data storage laws. That is an imbalance that becomes obvious especially in one country these days. The UK is amassing heaps of data about their citizens for their fight against terrorism (and other causes) but is failing miserably over and over [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/secret.png" alt="secret" title="secret" width="156" height="91" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11944" />The massive increase in data collection throughout the world has not led to responsible data storage laws. That is an imbalance that becomes obvious especially in one country these days. The UK is amassing heaps of data about their citizens for their fight against terrorism (and other causes) but is failing miserably over and over again when it comes to securing that data.</p><p>Think of past stories like top secret information in a digital camera that got sold for a few pounds on eBay or the discovery of an USB stick outside a pub containing information about 12 million British citizens.</p><p>This time it was mere paper that was responsible for a data leak. Most users would think that pre-computer age politicians would know how to handle at least secure information on paper properly. This is apparently not the case as police chief Bob Quick managed to carry a document marked secret in public which immediately caught the attention of bystanding photographers.</p><p><span
id="more-11945"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/robert-quick-300x276.jpg" alt="bob quick" title="bob quick" width="300" height="276" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-11943" /></p><p>The document, which can be viewed on the <a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/bob-quick-terror-raids-leak">Guardian&#8217;s</a> website contained information about an anti-terrorist raid. The details were extensive including names, addresses and command structures. The raid had to be conducted in bright daylight because of the security leak.</p><p>As Dante, who send me a link to the story points out: &#8220;It&#8217;s not just electronic security that<br
/> counts. It&#8217;’s also what happens when a user prints out the data.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
