<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Internet Browser Benchmark PeaceKeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 14:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futuremark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peacekeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benchmarks can be an appropriate method of comparing different products against each other. Internet browser benchmarks usually calculate the processing speed of web browsers using JavaScript. This method is a good indicator of the speed of a web browser. It fails however to test other important factors like usability, security or correct code interpretations. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/futuremark.jpeg" alt="futuremark" title="futuremark" width="128" height="99" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12557" />Benchmarks can be an appropriate method of comparing different products against each other. Internet browser benchmarks usually calculate the processing speed of web browsers using JavaScript. This method is a good indicator of the speed of a web browser. It fails however to test other important factors like usability, security or correct code interpretations. A browser that excels in JavaScript calculations and executions does not therefor need to be the best in other areas. Still, a speedy Internet browser is something that most users desire and strive after.</p>
<p><span id="more-12559"></span><a href="http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action">Peacekeeper</a> is a new Internet browser benchmark by Futuremark which are probably best known for their video graphics benchmarks 3DMark and PCMark. The benchmark is compatible will all web browsers that support Java and JavaScript. It will extract general information from the computer system including its cpu, computer memory and operating system before starting the benchmark. </p>
<p>The benchmark itself is a series of tests that are conducted in the same browser window. The result is displayed in the end which would not make that much sense unless there would be some sort of comparison available. Probably the most interesting aspect of the Internet browser benchmark is the chart in the end that is displaying the performance of several web browsers when run on four different computer systems.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/internet_browser-500x318.jpg" alt="internet browser" title="internet browser" width="500" height="318" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-12558" /></p>
<p>The chart displays the performance of ten web browsers, including both final versions like <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/internet-explorer/">Internet Explorer</a> 8 or Safari 4 and beta versions like <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/category/browsing/opera/">Opera</a> 10 or <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a> 3.1b3, on four different computer systems. Two Intel computer systems running the Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E8400 and Intel Core i7 Processor 920 plus two AMD systems running the AMD Athlon 64 3800+ and AMD Phenom II X4 940. It is therefor possible to analyse the performance of a web browser running on a local computer system with those run by other users who took the benchmark.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark/" title="benchmark" rel="tag">benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/browser-benchmark/" title="browser benchmark" rel="tag">browser benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/futuremark/" title="futuremark" rel="tag">futuremark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/internet-browser/" title="internet browser" rel="tag">internet browser</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/peacekeeper/" title="peacekeeper" rel="tag">peacekeeper</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/web-browser/" title="web browser" rel="tag">web browser</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/29/youtube-it-firefox-add-on/" title="Youtube It Firefox Add-on (April 29, 2009)">Youtube It Firefox Add-on</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/06/windows-xp-default-internet-browser-per-user-profile/" title="Windows XP: Default Internet Browser Per User Profile (March 6, 2009)">Windows XP: Default Internet Browser Per User Profile</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/21/qtweb-internet-browser/" title="QtWeb Internet Browser (January 21, 2009)">QtWeb Internet Browser</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/03/opera-10-beta/" title="Opera 10 Beta (June 3, 2009)">Opera 10 Beta</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/11/mozilla-firefox-3-0-11-released/" title="Mozilla Firefox 3.0.11 Released (June 11, 2009)">Mozilla Firefox 3.0.11 Released</a> (5)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/03/internet-browser-benchmark-peacekeeper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run Vista&#8217;s Windows System Assessment Tool In Windows XP</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/04/run-vistas-windows-system-assessment-tool-in-windows-xp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/04/run-vistas-windows-system-assessment-tool-in-windows-xp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[command-line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows System Assessment Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows-xp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winsat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Windows System Assessment Tool is being used in Windows Vista to compute the Windows Experience Index of the computer system. The tool is basically running in the background in Windows Vista to benchmark various components of the computer system. It is also possible to run the commands on the command line.
One interesting aspect of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Windows System Assessment Tool is being used in Windows Vista to compute the Windows Experience Index of the computer system. The tool is basically running in the background in Windows Vista to benchmark various components of the computer system. It is also possible to run the commands on the command line.</p>
<p>One interesting aspect of winsat.exe is that it can also be launched under Windows XP. It provides the same functionality on that operating system with the exception of the Windows Experience Engine. What you basically get is a benchmarking tool for your computer system developed by Microsoft.</p>
<p>The tool has to be acquired before it becomes available in Windows XP. The easiest way to do that is to download the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=42B5AC83-C24F-4863-A389-3FFC194924F8&#038;displaylang=en">Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor 1.0</a> and extract the installation package with the <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/23/unpack-installers-with-universal-extractor/">Universal Extractor</a> or a similar tool that is capable of that. The other possibility would be to install the Upgrade Advisor and look into the program directory afterwards.</p>
<p><span id="more-8720"></span>Winsat.exe can then be launched from the command line. The basic parameter that is providing details about arguments is <strong>winsat -?</strong>. The main assessments are cpu, disk, mem, dwm, d3d, media and mfmedia which somethings require additional switches.</p>
<p>The switches are not outlined in the help documentation. They are however available at the <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770542.aspx">Technet</a> Library page.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/winsat.jpg" alt="" title="winsat" width="485" height="139" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8721" /></p>
<p>The <strong>winsat mem</strong> command supports 14 switches. Here are a few examples of what you can do with the Windows System Assessment Tool:</p>
<p>The following example assesses CPU performance using 256-bit AES cryptographic algorithms:</p>
<p><code>winsat cpu -encryption</code></p>
<p>Measuring read speed of a local drive:</p>
<p><code>winsat disk -read -ran -drive c</code></p>
<p>How can this benchmark aid the user? It could for instance help to determine the best location for a cache by comparing the write and read speed of all hard drives and external drives. It can also be used to measure the speed of old or new computer memory.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark/" title="benchmark" rel="tag">benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/command-line/" title="command-line" rel="tag">command-line</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/computer-benchmark/" title="computer benchmark" rel="tag">computer benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-system-assessment-tool/" title="Windows System Assessment Tool" rel="tag">Windows System Assessment Tool</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-tips/" title="windows tips" rel="tag">windows tips</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-vista/" title="windows-vista" rel="tag">windows-vista</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-xp/" title="windows-xp" rel="tag">windows-xp</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/winsat/" title="winsat" rel="tag">winsat</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/08/use-windows-vista-fonts-in-windows-xp/" title="Use Windows Vista fonts in Windows XP (March 8, 2008)">Use Windows Vista fonts in Windows XP</a> (22)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/08/single-click-system-restore-point-creation/" title="Single Click System Restore Point Creation (July 8, 2008)">Single Click System Restore Point Creation</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/09/how-to-quickly-open-folders-in-windows/" title="How To Quickly Open Folders In Windows (February 9, 2009)">How To Quickly Open Folders In Windows</a> (18)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/04/11/fully-replace-windows-xp-fonts-with-windows-vista-fonts/" title="Fully Replace Windows XP Fonts with Windows Vista fonts (April 11, 2008)">Fully Replace Windows XP Fonts with Windows Vista fonts</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/28/fix-windows-vista-resetting-folder-view-settings/" title="Fix Windows Vista Resetting Folder View Settings (August 28, 2008)">Fix Windows Vista Resetting Folder View Settings</a> (4)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/04/run-vistas-windows-system-assessment-tool-in-windows-xp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Application Startup Timer</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/06/application-startup-timer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/06/application-startup-timer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Startup Timer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some software programs can be optimized to startup faster which might be the appropriate thing to do if they are used regularly by the user. One prime example would be to disable Java in Open Office which speeds up the application at startup quite a bit. It sometimes might be obvious that an application is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some software programs can be optimized to startup faster which might be the appropriate thing to do if they are used regularly by the user. One prime example would be to disable Java in Open Office which speeds up the application at startup quite a bit. It sometimes might be obvious that an application is starting up faster but it is always better to get solid proof.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.passmark.com/products/apptimer.htm">Application Startup Timer</a> (via <a href="http://blogs.howtogeek.com/mysticgeek/2008/10/30/benchmark-startup-times-of-software-applications-with-apptimer/">How To Geek</a>) can deliver that proof by measuring the startup time of applications. The application opens and closes a a selected application and logs the startup time of the application in a log file. This provides information about the performance gains when run before and after optimizing an application.</p>
<p>The application&#8217;s interface requires some explanation. The first field named Application has to point to an application on the system. The second called Cmd Line is optional and can be used to execute command line parameters. Log File points to a log file on the computer&#8217;s hard drive while Window Name has to contain part of the window&#8217;s name so that the application startup timer can automatically close the window. </p>
<p><span id="more-8106"></span><img src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/application_startup_timer.jpg" alt="" title="application startup timer" width="422" height="364" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8108" /></p>
<p>The first three check boxes determine how the application is detecting the window of the application that is currently tested while the last three check boxes determine how the benchmarking software should close the application window. The values shown in the screenshot should work fine for most applications.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/application-benchmark/" title="application benchmark" rel="tag">application benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/application-startup-timer/" title="Application Startup Timer" rel="tag">Application Startup Timer</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark/" title="benchmark" rel="tag">benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark-software/" title="benchmark software" rel="tag">benchmark software</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/software/" title="software" rel="tag">software</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-software/" title="windows software" rel="tag">windows software</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/windows-vista-drive-icons/" title="Windows Vista Drive Icons (January 30, 2008)">Windows Vista Drive Icons</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/21/windows-timer-2/" title="Windows Timer (January 21, 2009)">Windows Timer</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/05/windows-software-to-create-multiple-folders-at-once/" title="Windows Software To Create Multiple Folders At Once (July 5, 2009)">Windows Software To Create Multiple Folders At Once</a> (13)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/20/windows-registry-watcher/" title="Windows Registry Watcher (March 20, 2009)">Windows Registry Watcher</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/04/windows-live-messenger-content-retriever/" title="Windows Live Messenger Content Retriever (March 4, 2009)">Windows Live Messenger Content Retriever</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/06/application-startup-timer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>System Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/10/system-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/10/system-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if you take accumulated PC junk out of the equation, the most important factor in in how well your computer runs is the hardware specifications. Windows Vista provides some kind of indicator with its Vista Experience index, but it doesn’t give a whole lot of detail. Here are a few tools which you can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you take accumulated PC junk out of the equation, the most important factor in in how well your computer runs is the hardware specifications. Windows Vista provides some kind of indicator with its Vista Experience index, but it doesn’t give a whole lot of detail. Here are a few tools which you can use to really test your system’s performance.</p>
<p><strong>3D Mark06</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.futuremark.com/download/3dmark06/">3D Mark06</a> comes in a limited free version and $20 upgradable version. The program does a number of tests to your PC then brings up the results in your browser compared to other slower or faster systems.</p>
<p><strong>Fraps</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.download.com/Fraps/3000-2121_4-10316793.html">This tool</a> will give you a quick indication of what your graphical frame rate is by sitting in the corner of the screen and providing automatic updates. Additionally it also does screenshots and screencasts via the shortcut key.</p>
<p><span id="more-4921"></span>
<p><strong>Sandra</strong></p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.filehippo.com/download_sandra_lite/">program</a> provides complete system diagnosis and documentation. It’s completely free and provides a series of tools which will benchmark your PC, show hardware and software details and configuration and a whole number of other tests. This program will take a while when running tests but it provides the most comprehensive results of the three.</p>
<p><strong>CPU-Z</strong></p>
<p>This <a href="http://computershopper.download.com/CPU-Z/9100-2086_4-10050423.html?tag=lst-0-1">program runs</a> off a USB drive and is designed for those who are interested in overclocking their systems. By running it you can get all the hardware details of the system, useful maybe for checking the specs of someone else’s computer or for making sure you buy the correct item to upgrade.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark/" title="benchmark" rel="tag">benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/frame/" title="frame" rel="tag">frame</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/performance/" title="performance" rel="tag">performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/rate/" title="rate" rel="tag">rate</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/test/" title="test" rel="tag">test</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/07/28/why-2-is-better-than-1/" title="Why 2 is better than 1 (July 28, 2007)">Why 2 is better than 1</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/" title="Test Your Browser&#8217;s JavaScript Performance (October 17, 2008)">Test Your Browser&#8217;s JavaScript Performance</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/01/test-your-anti-virus-program/" title="Test your Anti-virus program (January 1, 2007)">Test your Anti-virus program</a> (10)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/07/test-the-speed-of-your-usb-flash-drives/" title="Test the Speed of your USB Flash Drives (June 7, 2008)">Test the Speed of your USB Flash Drives</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/21/switch-off-apps-for-gaming-mode-with-gamebooster/" title="Switch off apps for gaming mode with Gamebooster (April 21, 2009)">Switch off apps for gaming mode with Gamebooster</a> (10)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/10/system-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test the Speed of your USB Flash Drives</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/07/test-the-speed-of-your-usb-flash-drives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/07/test-the-speed-of-your-usb-flash-drives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb flash drives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The speed difference of USB Flash Drives that support the USB 2.0 standard can be more than 15 MB/s with maximum speeds of about 30 MB/s for fast drives. That&#8217;s still less than modern hard drives are capable of but better than a few years ago. I think it&#8217;s really astonishing that there are only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speed difference of USB Flash Drives that support the USB 2.0 standard can be more than 15 MB/s with maximum speeds of about 30 MB/s for fast drives. That&#8217;s still less than modern hard drives are capable of but better than a few years ago. I think it&#8217;s really astonishing that there are only a few recent comparisons of USB flash drive speeds available on the first results pages of Google. A <a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/664/2/">recent</a> (<a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/memory/display/4gb-usbflash-roundup_11.html#sect1">another one</a>) comparison from May 2008 that tested seven USB flash drives showed differences of more than 15 MB/s between the fastest and slowed drive while copying files of a certain size</p>
<p>If you already have an USB flash drive and want to know how it compares you can test the speed of it with the free version of HD Tune which can benchmark USB drives as well. The free version will only test the read speed and access time but it should give a good impression of the capabilities of the device at hand.</p>
<p>To make the test accurate you should set the test speed to Accurate in the benchmark options. The last two steps are to select the USB flash drive from the pulldown menu at the top and to click on start to start the benchmark.</p>
<p><span id="more-4899"></span><img src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hdtune_benchmark-500x407.png" alt="hdtune benchmark" title="hdtune benchmark" width="500" height="407" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4900" /></p>
<p>Those speed differences are really interesting. It&#8217;s probably a good idea to research USB flash drives extensively before buying one. What&#8217;s your experience with those drives ?</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/benchmark/" title="benchmark" rel="tag">benchmark</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/flash-drives/" title="flash drives" rel="tag">flash drives</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/usb-drives/" title="usb drives" rel="tag">usb drives</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/usb-flash-drives/" title="usb flash drives" rel="tag">usb flash drives</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/06/usb-flash-drives-usb-vaccine/" title="USB Flash Drives: USB Vaccine (March 6, 2009)">USB Flash Drives: USB Vaccine</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/19/usb-flash-drives-cleaner/" title="USB Flash Drives Cleaner (August 19, 2009)">USB Flash Drives Cleaner</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/28/test-usb-flash-drive-and-hard-drive-integrity-and-size/" title="Test USB Flash Drive And Hard Drive Integrity And Size (August 28, 2009)">Test USB Flash Drive And Hard Drive Integrity And Size</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/10/system-performance/" title="System Performance (June 10, 2008)">System Performance</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/26/solid-state-drives-test-results/" title="Solid State Drives Test Results (July 26, 2008)">Solid State Drives Test Results</a> (4)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/07/test-the-speed-of-your-usb-flash-drives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
