<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; anti-piracy</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/anti-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Apple To Patent Anti Piracy Technology</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/06/05/apple-to-patent-anti-piracy-technology/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/06/05/apple-to-patent-anti-piracy-technology/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 07:47:36 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Melanie Gross</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[anti-piracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[apple iphone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category> <category><![CDATA[patent]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=46049</guid> <description><![CDATA[Have you ever seen people at concerts holding an iPhone up in the air, trying to record the live performance (and probably uploading it somewhere later on as well)? But they usually don’t know that the moment they do that, they are infringing on IP copyright law. Piracy is punishable by law, even if it [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever seen people at concerts holding an iPhone up in the air, trying to record the live performance (and probably uploading it somewhere later on as well)? But they usually don’t know that the moment they do that, they are infringing on IP copyright law. Piracy is punishable by law, even if it is sporadically enforced. It hurts the device manufacturers as well whose device is being used in ways they never intended. No one wants to be blamed for what they never did. Camera phones are a huge part of our lives these days and often the most handy way of capturing the precious moments around us. But some people do use the built in camera’s in ways that were not intended by the manufacturers. Apple’s R&#038;D department has made a major break-through in anti-piracy technology and has applied to acquire the patent for that as well.</p><p>Apple’s anti-piracy technology is based on a simple but ingenious idea. In movie theaters, they distribute special infrared waves for hearing aid devices. Apple’s new technology will enable the iPhone to detect those infrared signals and the iPhone will sense that you are in a movie theater. Now if you will try to record a scene from Kung Fu Panda 2 with your iPhone this weekend, it will automatically sense that you are in a movie theater trying to record, and will shut off the camera automatically. Another possibility with the same technology can be that the movie/snap you capture will be watermarked with the name of the movie.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/disable-iphone.png" alt="disable-iphone" title="disable-iphone" width="351" height="503" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-46050" /></p><p>The same will be true with music concerts, if you try to take a picture of Lady Gaga, the whole picture could be watermarked with LadyGaga, but for that concert the management will have to bombard infrared waves on the audience.</p><p>This technology may have other implications as well, such as in museums and historical places. Here the authorities can set up infrared signals for each place, so that when you point your iPhone towards that, it will catch those signals and then show the detailed info about that on your iPhone screen, replacing the human guide or tour guide headphones.</p><p>It may take some time to completely implement this technology, and it may take even longer for us to see the practical implications of this technology. But none the less, even though this technology is simple and ingenious, it will have far reaching effects. Whether people like it or not, the millions of artists worldwide will love it since they lose money from piracy on a daily basis.<br
/> At the end of the day, anti-piracy laws will more than likely be something that we become accustomed to with time. However, these new laws will no doubt make big waves at first as people begin to think that their personal freedoms are being limited when they can no longer do what they want to do with the hardware that they have purchased. Fortunately or unfortunately, companies are in the business of making money, and taking the hard line with piracy will benefit their bottom line.</p><p><strong>Martin&#8217;s Take:</strong> This patent is about remote controlling functionality on Apple devices. Turning off features on the phone while the guy with his Android phone can still take a picture of his loved one on the concert, may be seen positively by the industry, but certainly not by consumers.</p><p>I have not found any limitations to that feature online. Can the technology turn off the complete phone? What if the phone is turned off then and someone needs to call in an emergency?</p><p>This new technology is one step closer to 1984 in my opinion, with company&#8217;s being able to control what you can do with your electronic devices, and what you cannot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/06/05/apple-to-patent-anti-piracy-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>14</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>About the Trimark Anti-Piracy Solution</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/09/about-the-trimark-anti-piracy-solution/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/09/about-the-trimark-anti-piracy-solution/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 07:09:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[P2p]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[anti-piracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nashville records]]></category> <category><![CDATA[trimark]]></category> <category><![CDATA[usenet]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/09/about-the-trimark-anti-piracy-solution/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I first read about Trimark at the Torrent Freak blog. This new anti-piracy solution targets websites and the Usenet by scanning the contents for serial numbers that have been implemented into the music files. An identified serial number would lead to the owner - the person that purchased the music - who will be held reliable for the damages caused by the spreading.
The article did not contain information about the technology behind Trimark other than that the "identification code maintains it’s integrity, despite copying or ripping." This is a very bold statement and I personally don't think that such a system will be possible unless they implement it in music that can be purchased in digital form only.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first read about Trimark at the <a
href="http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-outfit-to-spy-on-usenet-punish-legitimate-purchasers/" target="_blank">Torrent Freak</a> blog. This new anti-piracy solution targets websites and the Usenet by scanning the contents for serial numbers that have been implemented into the music files. An identified serial number would lead to the owner &#8211; the person that purchased the music &#8211; who will be held reliable for the damages caused by the spreading.</p><p>The article did not contain information about the technology behind Trimark other than that the &#8220;identification code maintains it’s integrity, despite copying or ripping.&#8221; This is a very bold statement and I personally don&#8217;t think that such a system will be possible unless they implement it in music that can be purchased in digital form only.</p><p>Trimark assumes that users who spread music are purchasing it before they spread it. While this might be true for the occasional P2P user this does not hold true for the big release groups. They get their stuff directly from the producers, the factory or a retail store without a possibility to be identified.</p><p><span
id="more-1646"></span>Several cases speak for themselves where music albums have been found on P2P networks weeks or even months before the official release date.</p><p>Let us suppose they release Trimark and integrate it into all digital mp3&#8242;s that are sold:</p><ul><li>This does not bother the release groups who spread the music albums way before anyone else gets their hands on them</li><li>This does not bother the users who rip audio CDs and make them available on P2P</li><li>This does not bother the users that record Internet radio and share it.</li><li>This does not bother the users who know about Trimark</li><li>This does not bother the downloaders at all</li><li>The main target as I can see it are the users who do not know about Trimark and upload some of their purchased songs to the Usenet. I&#8217;m not able to estimate the number but I personally do not think that it will be such a large amount of users.</li></ul><p>I can only come to the conclusion from what we know about Trimark that the system will be highly ineffective. As always, the only users that are found this way are the ones that are not informed about this new system.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/06/09/about-the-trimark-anti-piracy-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>How to disable Microsofts new Anti-Piracy Program</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/04/26/how-to-disable-microsofts-new-anti-piracy-program/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/04/26/how-to-disable-microsofts-new-anti-piracy-program/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:10:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[anti-piracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/04/26/how-to-disable-microsofts-new-anti-piracy-program/</guid> <description><![CDATA[A dig user named Manno posted this one liner over at digg.com and I thought it´s worth an article. I´am not able to test if it´s really that easy because a) my windows is legit and b) I´am not able to download the new program. Let me know if it works though. It is assumed that the "patch" is already installed, do the following:]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dig user named Manno posted this one liner over at digg.com and I thought it´s worth an article. I´am not able to test if it´s really that easy because a) my windows is legit and b) I´am not able to download the new program. Let me know if it works though. It is assumed that the &#8220;patch&#8221; is already installed, do the following:</p><ul><li>Run Task Manager</li><li>Kill the WgaTray.exe Process</li><li>Go to System32 folder</li><li>Rename wgatray.exe and wgalogon.dll to something else</li><li>Restart</li><li>End of annoying messages</li></ul><p><span
id="more-445"></span><br
/> [tags]microsoft, genuine, anti-piracy, ms, windows xp, wgatray.exe, wgalogon.dll[/tags]</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/04/26/how-to-disable-microsofts-new-anti-piracy-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
