<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; annoying websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/annoying-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>10 Annoying Aspects Of Tech Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoying sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoying websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rarst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good old Rarst posted another interesting article today about 10 things that make tech blogs unreadable. He has become quite the little ranter over at his Rarst stronghold but I have to admit that he has a point. 
His post got me thinking about aspects of tech blogs that I dislike and I came up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good old Rarst posted another interesting article today about <a href="http://www.rarst.net/web/unreadable-blogs/">10 things that make tech blogs unreadable</a>. He has become quite the little ranter over at his <a href="http://www.rarst.net/">Rarst stronghold</a> but I have to admit that he has a point. </p>
<p>His post got me thinking about aspects of tech blogs that I dislike and I came up with enough stuff to make my own /diggworthy/ list. Interestingly enough that is also number one on my list..</p>
<p><span id="more-8578"></span><strong>1. Writing For Digg or Other Social Networks</strong></p>
<p>The 10, Top 20, The Best.. Many articles that are written to make the Digg crowd digg the article. They seem to love top lists. And yes, I&#8217;m very well aware of the irony that this post is one.. Many people love those posts but I have to say that I avoid them at all costs unless they are special. Consider that before writing about the Top 10 <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a> extensions everyone should use or the Top 50 iPhone applications for iPhone owners.</p>
<p><strong>2. It is English</strong></p>
<p>My English is not perfect and I get regularly bashed in the comments because of mistakes I make. But, there are some blogs out there that are really hard to understand because of the grammatical structure and choice of words. If I read something and have to guess what the author meant because of the grammar then it is game over for that blog. Unless it is really unique.</p>
<p><strong>3. Repetition</strong></p>
<p>Seeing articles about the same news story that originated from one source on dozens of tech blogs is something that makes me click the Delete button in rapid succession. I do not want to read about it if all that you are doing is repeating what the source already wrote. Adding information or opinion is required to keep my fingers from itching.</p>
<p><strong>4. Not Linking To The Source</strong></p>
<p>There are actually two aspects that annoy me here. The first is when a blog is not linking to the source it got the news from. One rule of journalism and scientific writing is to always mention the source. If you do not mention it you land in the trashcan. Yes, many respected online magazines do not like to link to (or only sparsely) other websites.</p>
<p>Some sites on the other hand link directly to a file that they reviewed instead of the developers homepage. That&#8217;s a no-no</p>
<p><strong>5. Blogs That Are Not offering Full Feeds</strong></p>
<p>Offering only partial feeds might be a way to get a little bit of traffic from visitors who read the first paragraph of an article in their feed reader. It will on the other hand annoy many tech savvy users who do not have the time to visit hundreds of websites each day to read all the articles that they could not in their feed reader. If an article is interesting enough the readers will come because they might be interested in the comments as well.</p>
<p><strong>6. Advertising Instead Of Reviewing</strong></p>
<p>Some companies like to buy reviews to get backlinks and exposure on the Internet. This would not be a problem if the author of the article would disclose that fact. Sometimes they do not. If it is to obvious the blog will be deleted from the feed reader.</p>
<p><strong>7. Writing Unrelated Articles</strong></p>
<p>Stick with the tech stuff if you run a tech blog. I&#8217;m usually not interesting in reading stories about stuff that is not tech related. If it happens occasionally that&#8217;s fine but if it&#8217;s a regular thing I&#8217;m gone.</p>
<p><strong>8. Internal Linking</strong></p>
<p>Linking internally can be a great way to provide readers with additional information about a certain aspect of an article. Some websites overdo it on the other hand and always link certain keywords to certain pages on their website even if the information is not related at all.</p>
<p><strong>9. Dividing articles on pages</strong></p>
<p>Dividing a top 10 list on ten pages might increase the pageviews tremendously. It will however annoy the hell out of many readers who have to use the print feature to read the full article on one page. It gets complicated if these sites do not offer full feeds or a print option.</p>
<p><strong>10. Filling a Top List To Make It Look Better</strong></p>
<p>People digg top 10 lists but they might not like your fabulous top 17 list. That&#8217;s why you have decided to fill it with three not so fabulous entries to be able to post a top 20 list. And yes, this is another excellent example of a filler..</p>
<p>Your turn. Got anything to add? Let us know in the comments. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/annoying-sites/" title="annoying sites" rel="tag">annoying sites</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/annoying-websites/" title="annoying websites" rel="tag">annoying websites</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/digg/" title="digg" rel="tag">digg</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/rarst/" title="rarst" rel="tag">rarst</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/tech-blogs/" title="tech blogs" rel="tag">tech blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/top-list/" title="top list" rel="tag">top list</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/websites/" title="websites" rel="tag">websites</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/26/working-with-many-tabs-in-opera/" title="Working With Many Tabs In Opera (July 26, 2009)">Working With Many Tabs In Opera</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/11/why-stumbleupon-is-better-than-digg-for-webmasters/" title="Why Stumbleupon is better than Digg for Webmasters (May 11, 2007)">Why Stumbleupon is better than Digg for Webmasters</a> (11)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/29/why-hackers-take-advantage-of-global-events/" title="Why Hackers take advantage of global events (December 29, 2007)">Why Hackers take advantage of global events</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/11/when-on-digg-be-careful/" title="When on Digg be careful (January 11, 2008)">When on Digg be careful</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/14/whats-hot-at-my-partnersites/" title="Whats hot at my partnersites (November 14, 2005)">Whats hot at my partnersites</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
