<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; 1 gigabyte ram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/1-gigabyte-ram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why 2 is better than 1</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/07/28/why-2-is-better-than-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/07/28/why-2-is-better-than-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1 gigabyte ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 gigabyte ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/07/28/why-2-is-better-than-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you are wondering; I'm talking about computer RAM. I noticed a few days ago that one of the 512 Megabyte bars of RAM that I had installed on my computer was faulty and decided to order two 1 Gigabyte bars to replace both old bars. I had the hopes that the increase would also speed up some resource intensive applications.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you are wondering; I&#8217;m talking about computer RAM. I noticed a few days ago that one of the 512 Megabyte bars of RAM that I had installed on my computer was faulty and decided to order two 1 Gigabyte bars to replace both old bars. I had the hopes that the increase would also speed up some resource intensive applications.</p>
<p>While I did not conduct any tests I have the feeling that everything is running just a bit more fluent, a tad faster with less activity on my hard drives. I had a lot of hard drive activity for instance when Newsbin was loading the headers of a popular newsgroup which seemed to have been reduced quite a bit by the increase in RAM.</p>
<p>It should also have a impact on games for instance. I don&#8217;t play games at the moment except for CIV IV which is an excellent game but not a resource hungry one. It seems to run a bit faster but I could not see a big change here. It will become more obvious when I start playing games like Hellgate London for instance.</p>
<p><span id="more-1806"></span>I&#8217;m running XP which does not need that much RAM. If I would be running Vista instead I would probably see a big increase in performance though. I sometimes have to work with large videos and a short test has shown that the video editing application uses the additional Gigabyte well. </p>
<p>So, yes it is faster. Yes it reduces load on the hard drives. Yes it is totally worth it. At least for me.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/1-gigabyte-ram/" title="1 gigabyte ram" rel="tag">1 gigabyte ram</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/2-gigabyte-ram/" title="2 gigabyte ram" rel="tag">2 gigabyte ram</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/memory/" title="memory" rel="tag">memory</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/performance/" title="performance" rel="tag">performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/ram/" title="ram" rel="tag">ram</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/14/safe-computer-memory-upgrade/" title="Safe Computer Memory Upgrade (August 14, 2008)">Safe Computer Memory Upgrade</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/16/increasing-the-performance-of-windows-vista/" title="Increasing the performance of Windows Vista (December 16, 2006)">Increasing the performance of Windows Vista</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/08/windows-memory-diagnostic/" title="Windows Memory Diagnostic (September 8, 2008)">Windows Memory Diagnostic</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/11/virtual-memory-too-low/" title="Virtual Memory too low (February 11, 2008)">Virtual Memory too low</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/04/18/use-a-ramdisk-to-speed-up-applications/" title="Use a Ramdisk to speed up Applications (April 18, 2007)">Use a Ramdisk to speed up Applications</a> (7)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/07/28/why-2-is-better-than-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
