ghacks Technology News

Google Updates Sitelinks in Search Results

So called sitelinks are displayed if a specific search term has an authority site associated with it. If you search for Ghacks for instance, you will notice that my site is displayed at the top. Below the standard listing are the site links, which previously used about the same amount of space as a standard Google search results site listing.

Google today announced that they have modified site links. When you now search for Ghacks in the Google search engine, you will notice that the site links use up a lot of space. On my 1920×1200 resolution and a maximized window, that’s about two thirds of the screen.

google search sitelinks

Here is a screenshot of Google’s old sitelinks layout for comparison.

old-google-sitelinks

Why has Google made the decision to change the sitelinks layout? The Webmaster Central blog lists four reasons: Visibility, Flexibility, Clarity and Quality.

  • Visibility: The font size of the link text has been increased. Both the url and the first free words of the description added.
  • Flexibility: Sitelinks are now query dependent, and the maximum number of sitelinks has been increased from eight to twelve.
  • Clarity: Sitelinks and standard search results are now separated, which means that a sitelink entry will not appear in the general search results and vice verse.
  • Quality: Google with the update has “combined the signals” used for “site links and ranking”.

I personally think that Google went a bit overboard with the new sitelinks design. It takes an extreme amount of space. Both the description and url information are more or less useless, considering that you won’t usually see the full url or more than the first five or six words of the description on the search results page.

I’d rather like to see options to customize the layout. For my site, I’d remove the descriptions completely and start the urls after the domain name, as it should be clear that results come from the same domain (with the exception if a subdomain is listed of course).

Another thing that I think is missing is the ability to pick your own links for the sitelinks. Google picks them automatically, and your only option of influencing the listing is by demoting urls in the Webmaster Tools. First, that is no guarantee that the link won’t show up as a sitelink anymore, and second it does not guarantee that a better link is picked by Google’s algorithm.

For my site, I’d really like to add more categories and get rid of the articles that are displayed. That’s however not really possible.

You find more information about Google’s new sitelinks at the Google Webmaster Central blog. Have you encountered the new sitelinks in Google’s search engine yet? If so, what’s your opinion?

Related Articles:

Remove Google +1 Buttons, Previews From Google Search Results
Google Hiding Search Results Pages
Blacklist Google Search Results In Google Chrome
Compare Current And Upcoming Google Search Results
Google Ordered Lists Puts Numerals In Front Of Search Results

Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook, Twitter or Google+ using the icons below.



About the Author:Martin Brinkmann is a journalist from Germany who founded Ghacks Technology News Back in 2005. He is passionate about all things tech and knows the Internet and computers like the back of his hand. You can follow Martin on Facebook or Twitter.

Author: , Wednesday August 17, 2011 -
Tags:, , , ,


Responses so far:

  1. Alec says:

    Yes it is a bit over the top.
    I just noticed that if you append to your query it reverts to a one-line entry for ghacks.net and I assume all others with excessive site links.

  2. Cattleya says:

    Awesome feature(for me), prevent some website want copy other website domain name. Example:
    ghacks.net
    ghacks.org
    ghacks.com

    I really hate that. : (

  3. sudha says:

    Interesting progression, it really does help to establish the top stop as THE best place to be. I wonder if some users might find it unhelpful if they have to scroll that little bit further down to get more results…

Leave a Reply   Follow Ghacks   Subscribe To Comment Rss

Subscribe without commenting

© 2005-2012 Ghacks.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy - About Us