ghacks Technology News

Mozilla Considering App Store For Add-Ons

Developers who develope add-ons for the Firefox web browser or other Mozilla software can ask for inclusion at the AMO website where everyone can download those add-ons free of charge. The only option to actually earn money from their add-ons at this point is a donations module that can be added to individual add-on page. But that is nothing that developer’s can really calculate with.

Mozilla users on the other hand can currently download and use all of the add-ons that are provided at the Add-ons website free of charge.

This situation might change slightly according to an article posted at The Register in the next year as Mozilla is currently considering an app store for add-ons which would allow developers to charge for add-ons that they have created.

mozilla

The reasoning here is to give developers an incentive to develop and maintain add-ons for popular products such as Firefox or Thunderbird, something that many developers have been asking for apparently.

The Mozilla execs are on the other hand not that sure about the consumer opinion on the matter which is one of the things that has not been analyzed in detail yet.

A Mozilla marketplace could turn some developers who have been developing add-ons in their pastime into full time developer’s which could increase the response time and quality of specific add-ons. But then again, it could alienate users from Mozilla and their products. It could also make the site more difficulty to navigate, or cause multiple versions of add-ons to be released.

My personal opinion in the matter is that I would pay for a handful of add-ons providing that the money goes directly to the developer, that continued development is guaranteed and that the Mozilla store provides filters to make everyone happy. What’s your take on the development?

Update: Two years later and the situation has not changed.

Related Articles:

Mozilla Demos Web Apps Store
Mozilla Lightning 1.0 Beta Released [Mozilla]
Mozilla Plugin Check Now Checks Plugins In All Web Browsers
Mozilla Patches Critical Security Vulnerability In Firefox 3.6
Mozilla Firefox 10.0.1 Update About To Be Released

Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook, Twitter or Google+ using the icons below.



About the Author:Martin Brinkmann is a journalist from Germany who founded Ghacks Technology News Back in 2005. He is passionate about all things tech and knows the Internet and computers like the back of his hand. You can follow Martin on Facebook or Twitter.

Author: , Saturday December 12, 2009 -
Tags:, ,


Responses so far:

  1. Al says:

    I’m afraid if they do that, they’ll end up loosing Firefox users… I bet they won’t do it, specially now that Chrome has extensions, and they’re free.

  2. paul(us) says:

    I think if this really continues this is for Mozilla and me a particularly poor development. Because the developers could also benefit from other developers there program(‘s) (add-on(‘s)) And this would mean that they should have to pay for there fellow developers products what a powerful boost price spiral will give. I think this is cutting the developers in their own flesh. Next to that many current users will be hopping to a different (google or outhers) brouwser, and this again makes Mozilla Firefox weak(er). Which also will mean lower revenues for the developers. Really good developers are surely picked up by good to very good paying software companies. Therefore it is unwise for the developers to think they are practicing for the Premiership? I think not.

  3. nonentity says:

    I’ll put it plainly: I will never pay anything for any browser or any browser add-on.

  4. Nicolai S says:

    One one hand this is a good idea (faster/better/more secure addons) but on the other hand this is a bad idea (less people is going to use the addons).

    I don’t think Mozilla is going to do this because the only reasons why FF is the better than Chrome/Safari (WebKit) is because they have lot’s of addons (Chrome/Safari is faster than Firefox, but they still don’t have the same amount of addons), but if some of the “good” addons is going to cost money, then Mozilla lose lot’s users.

  5. Michael says:

    I won’t go quite so far as saying “never” but I will say “unlikely”. I have nothing against developers trying to earn a return on their time, that’s what our economy is built upon. However, I doubt I will see the sort of return on investment I will need to justify the cost, depending on said cost. An example would be, I love the add-on “Fast Dial”, and I could see myself paying a very small amount for it. Perhaps $1.00 USD. Another I could justify a buck for is “QuickDrag”. One buck would be my limit for an add-on for any browser, and it would have to be a really high quality and useful add-on.

  6. Nope says:

    I would never pay for any browser-addon, and I think most Firefox users won`t either. If this app store would become reality, at first the most popular addons would become payware, e.g. noscript, adblock+, downthemall and so on. And new lame commercial addons would emerge, that have no real purpose but the name of a famous brand. Maybe some addons would be available in two versions, crippled free one that shows ads, and a paid one. And there`s also a security aspect: addons gone commercial will stop updates for former free versions, and after some time millions of firefox-users would have old plugins with unfixed security holes. Summing up, going commercial would be a very bad move and have many bad consequences for Firefox users. On the other hand there are many rich kids out there, that equate “free” with “worthless”, and are happy to pay for anything. Maybe thats the new target of Mozilla…

  7. ginger says:

    I am in my late 60s and live on social security(a small amount). On occasion, when I can afford it, I will donate one dollar. I spend a lot of my time online and firefox is my fav browser although I also use wyzo,k-meleon,and ie8 when I have to. I am sure there are many other seniors like me living on very lean budgets and spending a lot of time on the net. These days, the fed,state,county,city, compel us citizens to pay all kinds of taxes and fees and now our reps in Washington are hell bent on forcing all of us whether we like it or not to have health insurance or be fined or go to jail!

    For firefox to now do the same thing is just one more nail in our coffins and if it should come to pass I will be forced to reevaluate my browser choice.

    Keep in mind that there are many alternative browsers to firefox and I don’t just mean opera,chrome,flock,etc,etc.

  8. DanTe says:

    Wow. Getting paid for work done. What a concept. A concept I see a lot of free-loaders are having a problem with.

    To continue to adult stuff: If Mozilla charges for add-ons, than I should be able to download the add-ons for offline install. (Say, using a serial # linked to my account/credit card.) I’m willing to pay for work done for me, but I would hate to keep paying everytime I reinstall Firefox. Since right now, add-ons can only be installed immediately online, and cannot be downloaded to be installed later.

  9. Anon says:

    Not a wise move. It’s not only the price but how easy it is to pay.
    Not every country has it easy to do online purchases, and not everyone has a credit card. As well, banks aren’t open at convenient times in my country so putting that $1 available for purchase is something you must do at the time you are at work.
    I hate online distribution since they didn’t address such issues yet, and many countries are not supported right (like sites not supporting multiple surnames or replacing characters that invalidate the order at bank level, such as Steam) It is not as easy as just getting a coin out of your wallet, hence I will just purchase things that I can purchase without all the trouble.
    Also you know what will happen with paid addons…code stealing, useless addons for expensive prices, piracy (you KNOW it will be there), etc.
    Not a wise move at all.

  10. Laughing says:

    This will never fly and if they do someone will develop a browser with free plugins become huge and Firefox will be no more. This is the philosophy that Craigslist understands and it’s why it’ll always be free.

  11. Dresandreal Sprinklehorn says:

    I’ll uninstall Firefox if they do that.

  12. Roman ShaRP says:

    I said some time ago that I won’t be bound to any app store. I don’t want serials and IDs, I don’t want to look for ways to pay for something from my country, I don’t want to use something my friends can’t just because I have more money than they do.

    So – I won’t pay money in app store.

    I think it would be better if Mozilla establish some scheme of donations which can be shared between add-ons developers according to usage statistics, and makes this scheme work in most countries. I’d like to pay such donation – if there will be clear and easy way to do it.

  13. DanTe says:

    Hey “Laughing” and “Dresandreal Sprinklehorn”. I love your attitude. I would like to hire you two to work for me. Please let me know when you will be available to code for free. I LOVE your Can-Do work attitude. Who needs money. It’s such a filthy thing.

Leave a Reply   Follow Ghacks   Subscribe To Comment Rss

Subscribe without commenting

© 2005-2012 Ghacks.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy - About Us