<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Full HD? That Is So Yesterday! Get Ready For 4K</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: 4K Videos Coming To Youtube &#124; Tolly Blog</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-1130714</link> <dc:creator>4K Videos Coming To Youtube &#124; Tolly Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:02:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-1130714</guid> <description>[...] is raising the bar once again with the announcement that the video hosting site will support 4K videos in the near future. Less than a year ago Youtube enabled full HD, 1080p, video resolutions on [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is raising the bar once again with the announcement that the video hosting site will support 4K videos in the near future. Less than a year ago Youtube enabled full HD, 1080p, video resolutions on [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 4K Videos Coming To Youtube</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-1130266</link> <dc:creator>4K Videos Coming To Youtube</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:58:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-1130266</guid> <description>[...] is raising the bar once again with the announcement that the video hosting site will support 4K videos in the near future. Less than a year ago Youtube enabled full HD, 1080p, video resolutions on [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is raising the bar once again with the announcement that the video hosting site will support 4K videos in the near future. Less than a year ago Youtube enabled full HD, 1080p, video resolutions on [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taco</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-915516</link> <dc:creator>Taco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-915516</guid> <description>It&#039;s pretty well known that 1080p is wasted on anything less than 50&quot;.  That being said you&#039;d need a 70&quot; TV for 4K.  Resolution isn&#039;t the issue, LCD and Plasma are still immature, that&#039;s where the bottle neck is not resolution.
More bullet point marketing hype nothing to see here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty well known that 1080p is wasted on anything less than 50&#8243;.  That being said you&#8217;d need a 70&#8243; TV for 4K.  Resolution isn&#8217;t the issue, LCD and Plasma are still immature, that&#8217;s where the bottle neck is not resolution.</p><p>More bullet point marketing hype nothing to see here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike J</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-913940</link> <dc:creator>Mike J</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-913940</guid> <description>How big a screen would you need to appreciate resolution of this magnitude, viewing at normal distances?? Sounds like tech in search of a market to me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How big a screen would you need to appreciate resolution of this magnitude, viewing at normal distances?? Sounds like tech in search of a market to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jojo</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-913852</link> <dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:43:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-913852</guid> <description>@Rupert - But if you don&#039;t constantly buy new stuff, then the economy will not grow and people will lose their jobs.
All modern economies are based on always more growth.  But like cancer, eventually, too much growth will kill the host!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rupert &#8211; But if you don&#8217;t constantly buy new stuff, then the economy will not grow and people will lose their jobs.</p><p>All modern economies are based on always more growth.  But like cancer, eventually, too much growth will kill the host!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rupert</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-913734</link> <dc:creator>Rupert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-913734</guid> <description>Isn&#039;t it all in danger of going down the Graphics Card arms race route, where every year new cards are released that are better than last years and so consumer feel the need to update each year.
TVs should last 5-10 years, but it seems that even if your TV is more than a year old it is out of date.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it all in danger of going down the Graphics Card arms race route, where every year new cards are released that are better than last years and so consumer feel the need to update each year.</p><p>TVs should last 5-10 years, but it seems that even if your TV is more than a year old it is out of date.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jojo</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-913641</link> <dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-913641</guid> <description>It&#039;s inevitable.  Storage gets denser, displays more robust, etc.  But HD 4k and greater displays require a much bigger net pipe.
The problem is that the ISP monopolies are restraining net bandwidth to users.  Until bandwidth is opened up, there is no practical use for this technology.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s inevitable.  Storage gets denser, displays more robust, etc.  But HD 4k and greater displays require a much bigger net pipe.</p><p>The problem is that the ISP monopolies are restraining net bandwidth to users.  Until bandwidth is opened up, there is no practical use for this technology.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: yogi</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/07/full-hd-that-is-so-yesterday-get-ready-for-4k/comment-page-1/#comment-913621</link> <dc:creator>yogi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:57:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18254#comment-913621</guid> <description>My opinion is who the hell needs such a high resolution?
Even today I find it hard to look at such high detail sometimes. HD does no favors to anyone whose skin is not perfect. I have no wish to see every pimple on the guy in every  idiot commercial or on the news.
I say: leave something for our imagination...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is who the hell needs such a high resolution?</p><p>Even today I find it hard to look at such high detail sometimes. HD does no favors to anyone whose skin is not perfect. I have no wish to see every pimple on the guy in every  idiot commercial or on the news.</p><p>I say: leave something for our imagination&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
