<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The new Ubuntu Software Center</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Wimz3n</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-1048328</link> <dc:creator>Wimz3n</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:57:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-1048328</guid> <description>I triedout Karmic wo luck. First glanze at USC it seemed nice, but there are issues (look up^). Thinking that Lucid would change that, but... Still crappy. Its like win7, Look is ok but it is still microsoft.
Just add d-load rate, ETA, simultaneous d-load, mark several at a time an then click &quot;INSTALL&quot;. No there are to many offs with USC. Stick to Synaptic.
This is one step FROM newbies, not to.
But apart from this Lucid is pretty OK</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I triedout Karmic wo luck. First glanze at USC it seemed nice, but there are issues (look up^). Thinking that Lucid would change that, but&#8230; Still crappy. Its like win7, Look is ok but it is still microsoft.<br
/> Just add d-load rate, ETA, simultaneous d-load, mark several at a time an then click &#8220;INSTALL&#8221;. No there are to many offs with USC. Stick to Synaptic.</p><p>This is one step FROM newbies, not to.</p><p>But apart from this Lucid is pretty OK</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rgrig</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-971326</link> <dc:creator>rgrig</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:17:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-971326</guid> <description>It&#039;s somewhat ironic that the solution to &quot;too many programs for doing X&quot; seems to be &quot;let&#039;s write another program for doing X&quot;. I wonder why they didn&#039;t simply evolve the existing tools. Perhaps I should wonder on the mailing list for Ubuntu Software Center, but I couldn&#039;t find one.
If it becomes the standard, then I too would like to see two of the problems mentioned above solved:
1. Batch operation. &quot;User story: Radu wants to uninstall all games on his computer. He types &#039;game&#039; in the search box, clicks &#039;select all&#039;, and then clicks &#039;uninstall&#039;. An annoying dialog box asks if he&#039;s sure. But he can live with it.&quot;
2. Easier way to see descriptions. &quot;User story: Claudia wants to install a program for plotting math functions that she can embed in a webpage. She&#039;s not sure if such a tool exists. She types &#039;math plot&#039; in the search box and then reads the descriptions of the matching applications to see if any satisfies her needs.&quot; What about sliding the description under an application when that application is selected (instead of going to a different pane)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s somewhat ironic that the solution to &#8220;too many programs for doing X&#8221; seems to be &#8220;let&#8217;s write another program for doing X&#8221;. I wonder why they didn&#8217;t simply evolve the existing tools. Perhaps I should wonder on the mailing list for Ubuntu Software Center, but I couldn&#8217;t find one.</p><p>If it becomes the standard, then I too would like to see two of the problems mentioned above solved:</p><p>1. Batch operation. &#8220;User story: Radu wants to uninstall all games on his computer. He types &#8216;game&#8217; in the search box, clicks &#8216;select all&#8217;, and then clicks &#8216;uninstall&#8217;. An annoying dialog box asks if he&#8217;s sure. But he can live with it.&#8221;</p><p>2. Easier way to see descriptions. &#8220;User story: Claudia wants to install a program for plotting math functions that she can embed in a webpage. She&#8217;s not sure if such a tool exists. She types &#8216;math plot&#8217; in the search box and then reads the descriptions of the matching applications to see if any satisfies her needs.&#8221; What about sliding the description under an application when that application is selected (instead of going to a different pane)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ritergal</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-963914</link> <dc:creator>Ritergal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:31:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-963914</guid> <description>I like the basic interface (though not the number of clicks), but do not like the limit of one item at a time. I&#039;m joining the throng of people who will stay with Add/Remove or Synaptic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the basic interface (though not the number of clicks), but do not like the limit of one item at a time. I&#8217;m joining the throng of people who will stay with Add/Remove or Synaptic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: abijith</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-957772</link> <dc:creator>abijith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:54:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-957772</guid> <description>if i press the install button it have to install but nothing is happening what to do please tel me
i am using ubuntu  netbookremix 9.10
advance thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i press the install button it have to install but nothing is happening what to do please tel me</p><p>i am using ubuntu  netbookremix 9.10</p><p>advance thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Homo Sum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Note On Scanning</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-951940</link> <dc:creator>Homo Sum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Note On Scanning</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-951940</guid> <description>[...] popped into the Ubuntu Software Centre (something else I hadn&#8217;t really played with yet&#8211;I had still be using the Synaptic [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] popped into the Ubuntu Software Centre (something else I hadn&#8217;t really played with yet&#8211;I had still be using the Synaptic [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Luisa</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-938362</link> <dc:creator>Luisa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-938362</guid> <description>I cannot disagree more with this article. The new software center is absolutely horrible. As it has been already explained, now installing a program it&#039;s a pain, clicking and clicking and password and click again and again... and come back to the list to look for another program and click and click and... you know. I absolutely hate it. Last time, after a clean install, I spend 2 hours (no kidding!!) to install all the programs I had before.
I was so happy with the previous method, you just scrolled down, reading the descriptions and with the help of the stars which gave you a clue about which one was better (if you&#039;re new, it really helps). Then you clicked the 10 or 100 programs you liked, install, and voila! All ready to go. If after that the computer spent, say, 10 minutes to install them, you just leave it and come back later. But now you have to wait for each and every program to install to go and install the next one. And don&#039;t try to install more than one at the same time because you only get error messages. It really drives me nuts.
I have no idea if there&#039;s any forum to ask for this change to be done, but if any of you know it, please do it for me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot disagree more with this article. The new software center is absolutely horrible. As it has been already explained, now installing a program it&#8217;s a pain, clicking and clicking and password and click again and again&#8230; and come back to the list to look for another program and click and click and&#8230; you know. I absolutely hate it. Last time, after a clean install, I spend 2 hours (no kidding!!) to install all the programs I had before.</p><p>I was so happy with the previous method, you just scrolled down, reading the descriptions and with the help of the stars which gave you a clue about which one was better (if you&#8217;re new, it really helps). Then you clicked the 10 or 100 programs you liked, install, and voila! All ready to go. If after that the computer spent, say, 10 minutes to install them, you just leave it and come back later. But now you have to wait for each and every program to install to go and install the next one. And don&#8217;t try to install more than one at the same time because you only get error messages. It really drives me nuts.</p><p>I have no idea if there&#8217;s any forum to ask for this change to be done, but if any of you know it, please do it for me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ubuntu 简介：写在 Ubuntu 9.10 发布前 &#124; 软言软语</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-937766</link> <dc:creator>Ubuntu 简介：写在 Ubuntu 9.10 发布前 &#124; 软言软语</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:14:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-937766</guid> <description>[...] The new Ubuntu Software Center @ gHacks 【2009-11-01 更新】 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new Ubuntu Software Center @ gHacks 【2009-11-01 更新】 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keep your Linux system up to date with KPackageKit</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-918456</link> <dc:creator>Keep your Linux system up to date with KPackageKit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:06:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-918456</guid> <description>[...] to date. There are new systems available such as the Ubuntu Software Center (see my article &#8220;The new Ubuntu Software Center&#8220;) that make installing software a piece of cake. But even with applications such as the USC [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to date. There are new systems available such as the Ubuntu Software Center (see my article &#8220;The new Ubuntu Software Center&#8220;) that make installing software a piece of cake. But even with applications such as the USC [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fizz</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-915249</link> <dc:creator>Fizz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:00:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-915249</guid> <description>I don&#039;t like the new Ubuntu Software Centre in 9.10
How do you install more than 1 program at a time???
I did a clean install and now have to install about 125 programs which may take a few days instead of just 125 clicks to select and then a click for install!  Before I&#039;d  go have lunch and comeback and all was ready... Not a good idea to require so many clicks and so much time. They should have been able to keep add/remove and just add more functions to it!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the new Ubuntu Software Centre in 9.10</p><p>How do you install more than 1 program at a time???</p><p>I did a clean install and now have to install about 125 programs which may take a few days instead of just 125 clicks to select and then a click for install!  Before I&#8217;d  go have lunch and comeback and all was ready&#8230; Not a good idea to require so many clicks and so much time. They should have been able to keep add/remove and just add more functions to it!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Installing Adobe Reader 9.2 in Ubuntu 9.10 @ Christoffer Kjølbæk</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-911731</link> <dc:creator>Installing Adobe Reader 9.2 in Ubuntu 9.10 @ Christoffer Kjølbæk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-911731</guid> <description>[...] 3 of the SoftwareCenter will offer &#8220;commercial software for sale&#8221;. But according to http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/ and http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1031 it should be possible to install [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3 of the SoftwareCenter will offer &#8220;commercial software for sale&#8221;. But according to http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/ and http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=1031 it should be possible to install [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roman ShaRP</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-910971</link> <dc:creator>Roman ShaRP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-910971</guid> <description>Thanks for the article. Tough I think that Synaptic is the best choice for me for now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. Tough I think that Synaptic is the best choice for me for now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pol</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-910665</link> <dc:creator>Pol</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:10:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-910665</guid> <description>Thanks a lot for your article. As soon as I saw the new Ubuntu Software Centre crap I got desperate for finding the name of what we had before, but couldn&#039;t remember it.  Googling around I came upon your sucking article: &quot;easier&quot; !? &quot;simpler&quot; !? Astonishing!  it requires now 3 mouse clicks to start seeing descriptions of software: select category, click on the f*-stupidly-tiny  icons, and then press an arrow icon the right (in add/remove, none, as it&#039;s the default startup view).
Holy cow!  In add/remove one has  at once glance access to (1) which category one is looking at, (2) Description of the program currently selected, (3) community rating of the usefulness/quality of the program, (4) list of other programs in the same category, (5) list of all categories  and (6)Big icons.
All in all, add/remove has always manage to encourage me to try out other software. It was appealing going there, quickly accessing all that information and wondering whether this or that could provide one a boost on productivity, or simply on fun. Only for very technical stuff was I using Synaptic, as there wasn&#039;t other way. All real-state of the window was smartly used to provide as much information to the user as possible.  Now, this USC (Unbelievable Software Crap)
has half of the window area displaying an annoying white background, i.e., nothing,nada, pure real-state waste; now, I simply feel repelled by that crap UI, horrified, traumatized.
Seriously, anybody who claims this USC is &quot;clearer&quot; or &quot;easier&quot; or &quot;simpler&quot;, either does not have any clue of what simple means, or is a blatant dishonest lier trying to &quot;sell&quot;  us something. If I normally hate the latter, even much more if this happens within the Open Software community.
I do not doubt that the underlying code of this USC might be more powerful, cleaner, faster (add whatever you want) than add/remove. The point here is in the UI. It ignores the most basic rule of UI design: design it in such a way that the user requires the least number of mouse clicks as possible to access any desired information. I repeat here, &quot;the least&quot; number of clicks. Those teenager brains that went on designing this USCrap must have mistaken the &quot;smaller than&quot; sign by the &quot;greater than&quot;. That the best I can say about them.  And then they go and have the happy idea of forcing the user to adopt this USC by default!
Thanks to your article, and to MIke&#039;s comment on October 31, I found what the name of the previous software was, and as Mike, I rushed to install add/remove. I can&#039;t see it yet anywhere (what the hell has this USCrap done!?) but I hope maybe a reboot will bring me back one of the simplest and most efficient software manager around: add/remove.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your article. As soon as I saw the new Ubuntu Software Centre crap I got desperate for finding the name of what we had before, but couldn&#8217;t remember it.  Googling around I came upon your sucking article: &#8220;easier&#8221; !? &#8220;simpler&#8221; !? Astonishing!  it requires now 3 mouse clicks to start seeing descriptions of software: select category, click on the f*-stupidly-tiny  icons, and then press an arrow icon the right (in add/remove, none, as it&#8217;s the default startup view).</p><p>Holy cow!  In add/remove one has  at once glance access to (1) which category one is looking at, (2) Description of the program currently selected, (3) community rating of the usefulness/quality of the program, (4) list of other programs in the same category, (5) list of all categories  and (6)Big icons.</p><p>All in all, add/remove has always manage to encourage me to try out other software. It was appealing going there, quickly accessing all that information and wondering whether this or that could provide one a boost on productivity, or simply on fun. Only for very technical stuff was I using Synaptic, as there wasn&#8217;t other way. All real-state of the window was smartly used to provide as much information to the user as possible.  Now, this USC (Unbelievable Software Crap)<br
/> has half of the window area displaying an annoying white background, i.e., nothing,nada, pure real-state waste; now, I simply feel repelled by that crap UI, horrified, traumatized.</p><p>Seriously, anybody who claims this USC is &#8220;clearer&#8221; or &#8220;easier&#8221; or &#8220;simpler&#8221;, either does not have any clue of what simple means, or is a blatant dishonest lier trying to &#8220;sell&#8221;  us something. If I normally hate the latter, even much more if this happens within the Open Software community.</p><p>I do not doubt that the underlying code of this USC might be more powerful, cleaner, faster (add whatever you want) than add/remove. The point here is in the UI. It ignores the most basic rule of UI design: design it in such a way that the user requires the least number of mouse clicks as possible to access any desired information. I repeat here, &#8220;the least&#8221; number of clicks. Those teenager brains that went on designing this USCrap must have mistaken the &#8220;smaller than&#8221; sign by the &#8220;greater than&#8221;. That the best I can say about them.  And then they go and have the happy idea of forcing the user to adopt this USC by default!</p><p>Thanks to your article, and to MIke&#8217;s comment on October 31, I found what the name of the previous software was, and as Mike, I rushed to install add/remove. I can&#8217;t see it yet anywhere (what the hell has this USCrap done!?) but I hope maybe a reboot will bring me back one of the simplest and most efficient software manager around: add/remove.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Links 01/11/2009: OggCamp 2009 Coverage, Linux Graphics Survey Starts &#124; Boycott Novell</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-910316</link> <dc:creator>Links 01/11/2009: OggCamp 2009 Coverage, Linux Graphics Survey Starts &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:53:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-910316</guid> <description>[...] The new Ubuntu Software Center You may remember my mention of the Ubuntu Software Center in my article “Ubuntu Karmic Koala preview“. Well, Karmic Koala is now officially Ubuntu 9.10 and is on the streets. I have installed the release and am as pleased as I expected I would be. One aspect of 9.10 that I was most interested in was the new Ubuntu Software Center. I have always been a big fan of apt-get and Synaptic, so I was curious as to how Ubuntu could possibly improve on either of these tools. I have used the Software Center a few times already and I can see why Ubuntu migrated to this new system: It’s very user friendly (more so than the original Add/Remove Software tool), it’s reliable, it’s easier to add new repositories, and it has a much cleaner interface. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new Ubuntu Software Center You may remember my mention of the Ubuntu Software Center in my article “Ubuntu Karmic Koala preview“. Well, Karmic Koala is now officially Ubuntu 9.10 and is on the streets. I have installed the release and am as pleased as I expected I would be. One aspect of 9.10 that I was most interested in was the new Ubuntu Software Center. I have always been a big fan of apt-get and Synaptic, so I was curious as to how Ubuntu could possibly improve on either of these tools. I have used the Software Center a few times already and I can see why Ubuntu migrated to this new system: It’s very user friendly (more so than the original Add/Remove Software tool), it’s reliable, it’s easier to add new repositories, and it has a much cleaner interface. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jamie Dimmel</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-910193</link> <dc:creator>Jamie Dimmel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:17:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-910193</guid> <description>This is ridiculous, it&#039;s an advertisement, not review. How in the name of all the trees in the forest can you say it&#039; snow easier to add new software sources when it is the SAME STEPS as to add to Synaptic, with the only difference being it&#039;s under the &quot;Settings&quot;, &quot;Repositories&quot; menu instead of &quot;Edit&quot;, &quot;Software Sources&quot;. Please explain how the former was &quot;confusing&quot;, as it seems just as clear as the new way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous, it&#8217;s an advertisement, not review. How in the name of all the trees in the forest can you say it&#8217; snow easier to add new software sources when it is the SAME STEPS as to add to Synaptic, with the only difference being it&#8217;s under the &#8220;Settings&#8221;, &#8220;Repositories&#8221; menu instead of &#8220;Edit&#8221;, &#8220;Software Sources&#8221;. Please explain how the former was &#8220;confusing&#8221;, as it seems just as clear as the new way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gmail at your fingertips on the Linux desktop</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-910063</link> <dc:creator>Gmail at your fingertips on the Linux desktop</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-910063</guid> <description>[...] There are a number of possible applications that can take care of this task. In this article I am going to illustrate a few of those tools for you so you can choose which one is the right one for you.  So, without further adieu, let&#8217;s get on with the installation and usage. NOTE: All of these tools can be found and installed using the new Ubuntu Software Center. For more information on that tool, take a look at my article &#8220;The new Ubuntu Software Center&#8220;. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are a number of possible applications that can take care of this task. In this article I am going to illustrate a few of those tools for you so you can choose which one is the right one for you.  So, without further adieu, let&#8217;s get on with the installation and usage. NOTE: All of these tools can be found and installed using the new Ubuntu Software Center. For more information on that tool, take a look at my article &#8220;The new Ubuntu Software Center&#8220;. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mickey</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-909819</link> <dc:creator>mickey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:08:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-909819</guid> <description>you got all that for free. Now you can pay to Bill and make him a bit happier and what you get for it is I think not worth of it. goog luck with win7.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you got all that for free. Now you can pay to Bill and make him a bit happier and what you get for it is I think not worth of it. goog luck with win7.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-909662</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 05:26:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-909662</guid> <description>I have switched back to add/remove</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have switched back to add/remove</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lord lucan</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-909561</link> <dc:creator>Lord lucan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:50:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-909561</guid> <description>The installation is very easy and painless, unlike the user experience which followed.
1. Comodo flagged Wubi as a virus!
2. Trying to install MythTV failed several times.
3. Ubuntu offered to supply a &quot;firmware&quot; update to my TV card to enable it to be used... no thanks!!
4. I could find no easy way to configure Compiz.  Trying to do so froze my system.
5. The desktop is ugly (only my opinion).
6. Everytime you try to do something, you are prompted for a user password.
7. There&#039;s no real indication as to which application is regarded as the most complete for a given task, when searching for things to install.
Besides all that, it boots fairly quickly and all other hardware worked fine.
I wanted desperately for Ubuntu to impress me and stall me from purchasing Windows7, but I&#039;m afraid the issue has now been settled and Bill will become just a little bit richer fairly soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The installation is very easy and painless, unlike the user experience which followed.</p><p>1. Comodo flagged Wubi as a virus!<br
/> 2. Trying to install MythTV failed several times.<br
/> 3. Ubuntu offered to supply a &#8220;firmware&#8221; update to my TV card to enable it to be used&#8230; no thanks!!<br
/> 4. I could find no easy way to configure Compiz.  Trying to do so froze my system.<br
/> 5. The desktop is ugly (only my opinion).<br
/> 6. Everytime you try to do something, you are prompted for a user password.<br
/> 7. There&#8217;s no real indication as to which application is regarded as the most complete for a given task, when searching for things to install.</p><p>Besides all that, it boots fairly quickly and all other hardware worked fine.</p><p>I wanted desperately for Ubuntu to impress me and stall me from purchasing Windows7, but I&#8217;m afraid the issue has now been settled and Bill will become just a little bit richer fairly soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IndodaMJB</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/30/the-new-ubuntu-software-center/comment-page-1/#comment-909470</link> <dc:creator>IndodaMJB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17900#comment-909470</guid> <description>Not sure if I like it that much - still got to explore but I haven&#039;t found a away to install more than one program at a time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I like it that much &#8211; still got to explore but I haven&#8217;t found a away to install more than one program at a time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
