<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Spam filtering with Kmail</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/16/spam-filtering-with-kmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/16/spam-filtering-with-kmail/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jorge getson</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/16/spam-filtering-with-kmail/comment-page-1/#comment-978007</link> <dc:creator>jorge getson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17337#comment-978007</guid> <description>That would be nice but if I get an email from Obama@obamaaintmymama.gov and classify it as spam and then it is included at the so called Internet Spam site, then you probably would be unhappy about not getting email from your favorite Communist.
Then you would want a list that conforms to your wishes verses mine.
I would agree.
That is why I  make my list instead of depending on someone else&#039;s concept of what is spam.
The internet site could include known large bulk spam sites  and very notorious sites but I believe some of those already exist.
Black lists etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be nice but if I get an email from Obama@obamaaintmymama.gov and classify it as spam and then it is included at the so called Internet Spam site, then you probably would be unhappy about not getting email from your favorite Communist.<br
/> Then you would want a list that conforms to your wishes verses mine.<br
/> I would agree.<br
/> That is why I  make my list instead of depending on someone else&#8217;s concept of what is spam.<br
/> The internet site could include known large bulk spam sites  and very notorious sites but I believe some of those already exist.<br
/> Black lists etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oiaohm</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/16/spam-filtering-with-kmail/comment-page-1/#comment-901045</link> <dc:creator>oiaohm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:43:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17337#comment-901045</guid> <description>Spamassassin can get known bad lists Ishan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spamassassin can get known bad lists Ishan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ishan@ILoveFreeSoftware</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/16/spam-filtering-with-kmail/comment-page-1/#comment-900171</link> <dc:creator>Ishan@ILoveFreeSoftware</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:18:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=17337#comment-900171</guid> <description>Nice article. Regarding making Bogofilter &quot;learn&quot;, this is killing my enthusiasm about this software. I would love to have something that could be driven from some central internet based engine to know what is spam, and what is not. This would ensure that if some mails have already been classified as spam by some other user, I don&#039;t have to do the same.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Regarding making Bogofilter &#8220;learn&#8221;, this is killing my enthusiasm about this software. I would love to have something that could be driven from some central internet based engine to know what is spam, and what is not. This would ensure that if some mails have already been classified as spam by some other user, I don&#8217;t have to do the same.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
