<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Create Custom Firefox And Thunderbird Installations</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/06/create-custom-firefox-and-thunderbird-installations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/06/create-custom-firefox-and-thunderbird-installations/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ken Saunders</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/06/create-custom-firefox-and-thunderbird-installations/comment-page-1/#comment-879127</link> <dc:creator>Ken Saunders</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:26:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=16065#comment-879127</guid> <description>Interesting, but I&#039;m not sure how much I would trust software from someone who can&#039;t consistently present the word Firefox accurately.
&quot;Profile Information
Firefox - Mozilla FireFox&quot;
Also, &quot;This program will try to unpack...&quot;
That doesn&#039;t really invoke too much confidence.
Why not just say, &quot;There&#039;s a 50% chance that your time won&#039;t be wasted&quot;?
Aw man, now I&#039;m finding that the last update that I see on the page linked to from this posted was in 2006.
But wait, there&#039;s more,
&quot;SOF is updated to support ThunderBird...&quot;
&quot;...now it supports firefox,thunderbird...&quot;
Damn, now I find that it&#039;s hosted on rapidshare?
Look, I can see that you apparently didn&#039;t have any issues with downloading and launching this app (due to the screen shots), and it may work just fine and be perfectly safe, but as long as I can help it, I&#039;m not going to download, install, and launch any program (let alone ask others to install something generated by it) that is presented so half assed and raises so many flags.
I&#039;m disappointed that ghacks would encourage others to do the opposite of that.
Perhaps if someone would contact the developer or team up with him to clean things up and at least use Google Code to host the project, then it would have more credibility.
And to think, I came here from a Google Alert in Thunderbird (or ThunderBird) and followed the links from this post to the forum to leave feeling like all that I&#039;ve accomplished is sounding like a jackass.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but I&#8217;m not sure how much I would trust software from someone who can&#8217;t consistently present the word Firefox accurately.</p><p>&#8220;Profile Information<br
/> Firefox &#8211; Mozilla FireFox&#8221;</p><p>Also, &#8220;This program will try to unpack&#8230;&#8221;<br
/> That doesn&#8217;t really invoke too much confidence.<br
/> Why not just say, &#8220;There&#8217;s a 50% chance that your time won&#8217;t be wasted&#8221;?</p><p>Aw man, now I&#8217;m finding that the last update that I see on the page linked to from this posted was in 2006.</p><p>But wait, there&#8217;s more,<br
/> &#8220;SOF is updated to support ThunderBird&#8230;&#8221;<br
/> &#8220;&#8230;now it supports firefox,thunderbird&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>Damn, now I find that it&#8217;s hosted on rapidshare?</p><p>Look, I can see that you apparently didn&#8217;t have any issues with downloading and launching this app (due to the screen shots), and it may work just fine and be perfectly safe, but as long as I can help it, I&#8217;m not going to download, install, and launch any program (let alone ask others to install something generated by it) that is presented so half assed and raises so many flags.<br
/> I&#8217;m disappointed that ghacks would encourage others to do the opposite of that.<br
/> Perhaps if someone would contact the developer or team up with him to clean things up and at least use Google Code to host the project, then it would have more credibility.</p><p>And to think, I came here from a Google Alert in Thunderbird (or ThunderBird) and followed the links from this post to the forum to leave feeling like all that I&#8217;ve accomplished is sounding like a jackass.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/06/create-custom-firefox-and-thunderbird-installations/comment-page-1/#comment-878643</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=16065#comment-878643</guid> <description>Well it basically allows a user to create a firefox setup file that contains custom add-ons, plugins and bookmarks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it basically allows a user to create a firefox setup file that contains custom add-ons, plugins and bookmarks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CHR</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/06/create-custom-firefox-and-thunderbird-installations/comment-page-1/#comment-878630</link> <dc:creator>CHR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:23:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=16065#comment-878630</guid> <description>Well, I could easily create a profile with the built-in profile manager. Or am I missing the point of this program?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I could easily create a profile with the built-in profile manager. Or am I missing the point of this program?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
