<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Windows SSH Server WinSSHD</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/windows-ssh-server-winsshd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/windows-ssh-server-winsshd/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: supomo</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/windows-ssh-server-winsshd/comment-page-1/#comment-863347</link> <dc:creator>supomo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=15069#comment-863347</guid> <description>I like Cygwin version of sshd. I haven&#039;t tried all other windows version, but cygwin if more like linux and has a lot more development into it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Cygwin version of sshd. I haven&#8217;t tried all other windows version, but cygwin if more like linux and has a lot more development into it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/windows-ssh-server-winsshd/comment-page-1/#comment-862263</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=15069#comment-862263</guid> <description>Walter I cannot really say how they compare when connecting from a Linux system. WinSSHD is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system while FreeSSHD is not. I personally think that it is much easier to work with FreeSSHD than with WinSSHD although the latter could prove to be better suited for larger computer networks and domains. Quite a few users are reporting problems with FreeSSHD when connecting from a Linux system, take a look http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;sourceid=navclient&amp;gfns=1&amp;q=freesshd+linux+connection+problems</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter I cannot really say how they compare when connecting from a Linux system. WinSSHD is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system while FreeSSHD is not. I personally think that it is much easier to work with FreeSSHD than with WinSSHD although the latter could prove to be better suited for larger computer networks and domains. Quite a few users are reporting problems with FreeSSHD when connecting from a Linux system, take a look http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;sourceid=navclient&amp;gfns=1&amp;q=freesshd+linux+connection+problems</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Walter</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/windows-ssh-server-winsshd/comment-page-1/#comment-862257</link> <dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:16:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=15069#comment-862257</guid> <description>Hi Martin,
can you say how this one compares to Mobassh or freesshd?
Especially the later one does not work for me very well when I connect from a Linux System.
Thanks,
Walt</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin,</p><p>can you say how this one compares to Mobassh or freesshd?<br
/> Especially the later one does not work for me very well when I connect from a Linux System.</p><p>Thanks,<br
/> Walt</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
