<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Critical Security Vulnerability In Firefox 3.5</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/</link> <description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: anakaneh</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853241</link> <dc:creator>anakaneh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:38:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853241</guid> <description>Since it&#039;s a javasrcict vulnerability, activated noscript add-on in unknown sites already solved the problem, right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it&#8217;s a javasrcict vulnerability, activated noscript add-on in unknown sites already solved the problem, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Transcontinental</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853157</link> <dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853157</guid> <description>Looking forwards to 351 (expected beginning of next week (week 30/2009) as to what I&#039;ve read). Until then (but ONLY until then), javascript.options.jit.content set to false, sorry TraceMonkey! Seems *really* critical, so better follow the temporary work-around.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forwards to 351 (expected beginning of next week (week 30/2009) as to what I&#8217;ve read). Until then (but ONLY until then), javascript.options.jit.content set to false, sorry TraceMonkey!<br /> Seems *really* critical, so better follow the temporary work-around.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Taco</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853142</link> <dc:creator>Taco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:47:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853142</guid> <description>Reason 201 to use Sandboxie...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reason 201 to use Sandboxie&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nico</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853123</link> <dc:creator>nico</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:09:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853123</guid> <description>@Martin_July 15, 2009 at 5:26 pm Indeed all platforms! See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503286Product: 	Core Component: 	JavaScript Engine Version: 	1.9.1 Branch Platform: 	All All </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martin_July 15, 2009 at 5:26 pm<br /> Indeed all platforms!<br /> See <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503286" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503286</a></p><p>Product: 	Core<br /> Component: 	JavaScript Engine<br /> Version: 	1.9.1 Branch<br /> Platform: 	All All</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853052</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:26:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853052</guid> <description>The Mozilla team is not mentioning the affected operating systems but it is very likely (from the choice of words used) that all supported operating systems are affected.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mozilla team is not mentioning the affected operating systems but it is very likely (from the choice of words used) that all supported operating systems are affected.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nico</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853044</link> <dc:creator>nico</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853044</guid> <description>Only Windows vulnerable?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only Windows vulnerable?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853035</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853035</guid> <description>You need to reverse the changes manually. You can simply perform the same operating again (a double-click would change the setting from false to true again).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to reverse the changes manually. You can simply perform the same operating again (a double-click would change the setting from false to true again).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: paulus</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853027</link> <dc:creator>paulus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:33:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853027</guid> <description>A question Martin when the official security patch is provided, by the Mozilla Firefox team, do i have to put the settings back in the original settings, before i patch?  And if so how? Or do I not have to worry about this and can i just patch over?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question Martin when the official security patch is provided, by the Mozilla Firefox team, do i have to put the settings back in the original settings, before i patch?  And if so how? Or do I not have to worry about this and can i just patch over?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lain</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-853005</link> <dc:creator>Lain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-853005</guid> <description>Does this apply to both Mac and PC?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this apply to both Mac and PC?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sarang Dravid</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/15/critical-security-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-852974</link> <dc:creator>Sarang Dravid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:13:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14412#comment-852974</guid> <description>Thanx for the update Martin. I think this must be led to my readers too :-) . Cheers for firefox users :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for the update Martin. I think this must be led to my readers too :-) . Cheers for firefox users :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/19 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ghacks.net @ 2010-03-17 21:29:42 -->