<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Update Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:09:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B. Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/#comment-844674</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844674</guid>
		<description>So what the process change will happen on its own or when we update a google app or if we download a new app?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what the process change will happen on its own or when we update a google app or if we download a new app?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/#comment-844408</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844408</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a step in the right direction. It would be better if their programs simply checked for a new version independently when they are started, but I&#039;ll settle for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a step in the right direction. It would be better if their programs simply checked for a new version independently when they are started, but I&#8217;ll settle for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Update Changes &#124; Tech Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/#comment-844395</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Update Changes &#124; Tech Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844395</guid>
		<description>[...] More here:     Google Update Changes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here:     Google Update Changes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/#comment-844322</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844322</guid>
		<description>Those automatic update functions are usually for users who have no clue about computer security. We both know when a new version of a software which means that the automatic update check is not necessary at all, especially when implemented this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those automatic update functions are usually for users who have no clue about computer security. We both know when a new version of a software which means that the automatic update check is not necessary at all, especially when implemented this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/#comment-844308</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844308</guid>
		<description>Definitely a *huge* improvement. But as far as I&#039;m concerned : no google update at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a *huge* improvement. But as far as I&#8217;m concerned : no google update at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
