<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Update Changes</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: B. Moore</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-844674</link> <dc:creator>B. Moore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:55:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844674</guid> <description>So what the process change will happen on its own or when we update a google app or if we download a new app?????</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what the process change will happen on its own or when we update a google app or if we download a new app?????</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rick</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-844408</link> <dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:11:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844408</guid> <description>That&#039;s a step in the right direction. It would be better if their programs simply checked for a new version independently when they are started, but I&#039;ll settle for this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a step in the right direction. It would be better if their programs simply checked for a new version independently when they are started, but I&#8217;ll settle for this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Update Changes &#124; Tech Talk</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-844395</link> <dc:creator>Google Update Changes &#124; Tech Talk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844395</guid> <description>[...] More here:     Google Update Changes [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here:     Google Update Changes [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-844322</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:33:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844322</guid> <description>Those automatic update functions are usually for users who have no clue about computer security. We both know when a new version of a software which means that the automatic update check is not necessary at all, especially when implemented this way.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those automatic update functions are usually for users who have no clue about computer security. We both know when a new version of a software which means that the automatic update check is not necessary at all, especially when implemented this way.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Transcontinental</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/google-update-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-844308</link> <dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=14095#comment-844308</guid> <description>Definitely a *huge* improvement. But as far as I&#039;m concerned : no google update at all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a *huge* improvement. But as far as I&#8217;m concerned : no google update at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
