<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: MP3 Quality Modifier</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: MP3 Quality Modifier &#124; Mash Central</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-843002</link> <dc:creator>MP3 Quality Modifier &#124; Mash Central</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:47:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-843002</guid> <description>[...] Excerpt from:  MP3 Quality Modifier [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from:  MP3 Quality Modifier [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-841404</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:40:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-841404</guid> <description>Enigma I agree that it only makes sense when lowering the quality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enigma I agree that it only makes sense when lowering the quality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MP3 Quality Modifier - Computer Forums</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-841289</link> <dc:creator>MP3 Quality Modifier - Computer Forums</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:30:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-841289</guid> <description>[...] Quality Modifier    Source MP3 Quality Modifier  The opinion on the quality of digital music can differ widely depending on the personal taste. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quality Modifier    Source MP3 Quality Modifier  The opinion on the quality of digital music can differ widely depending on the personal taste. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MP3 Quality Modifier &#124; Adobe Tutorials</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-841281</link> <dc:creator>MP3 Quality Modifier &#124; Adobe Tutorials</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:54:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-841281</guid> <description>[...] The opinion on the quality of digital music can differ widely depending on the personal taste. Some users are perfectly happy with music that has been encoded with 128 Kbps or even less while others swear on lossless music codecs. The perception of the individual is the most important factor although others might play a role.  Original post: MP3 Quality Modifier [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The opinion on the quality of digital music can differ widely depending on the personal taste. Some users are perfectly happy with music that has been encoded with 128 Kbps or even less while others swear on lossless music codecs. The perception of the individual is the most important factor although others might play a role.  Original post: MP3 Quality Modifier [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas Simon</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-841280</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas Simon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-841280</guid> <description>Get BonkEnc, (http://www.bonkenc.org/) it&#039;s brilliant, has a terrible interface, but the best free MP3 tool out there as far as I am concerned. You can do everything with Bonk that you can do with this and MUCH MORE, completely free (and open source I think).
If you are a beginner and very confused then check out my guide to working with MP3&#039;s &gt;&gt;
http://ninjarabbits.blogspot.com/2009/04/beginners-guide-to-mp3s-music-archiving.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get BonkEnc, (http://www.bonkenc.org/) it&#8217;s brilliant, has a terrible interface, but the best free MP3 tool out there as far as I am concerned. You can do everything with Bonk that you can do with this and MUCH MORE, completely free (and open source I think).</p><p>If you are a beginner and very confused then check out my guide to working with MP3&#8242;s &gt;&gt;<br
/> http://ninjarabbits.blogspot.com/2009/04/beginners-guide-to-mp3s-music-archiving.html</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MP3 Quality Modifier</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-841276</link> <dc:creator>MP3 Quality Modifier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:45:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-841276</guid> <description>[...] has been encoded with 128 Kbps or even less while others swear on &#8230;     The rest is here:  MP3 Quality Modifier      Posted in Music &#124;  Tags: and-guide, basements, been-encoded, even-less, kbps-or-even, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been encoded with 128 Kbps or even less while others swear on &#8230;     The rest is here:  MP3 Quality Modifier      Posted in Music |  Tags: and-guide, basements, been-encoded, even-less, kbps-or-even, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Enigma</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/29/mp3-quality-modifier/comment-page-1/#comment-841148</link> <dc:creator>Enigma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13995#comment-841148</guid> <description>Errrr this is pointless if your going from say 128 to 256 as the all your doing is increasing the file size and not the quality as you can only improve the quality from either the CD or a lossless file.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errrr this is pointless if your going from say 128 to 256 as the all your doing is increasing the file size and not the quality as you can only improve the quality from either the CD or a lossless file.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
