<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Euro VPS</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-1093010</link> <dc:creator>Euro VPS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 17:04:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-1093010</guid> <description>VPS’s are a wicked platform for low to mid load servers. with the different platforms they can run on, I would suggest virtuozzo as the recent developments with HyperVM render it exploitable</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VPS’s are a wicked platform for low to mid load servers. with the different platforms they can run on, I would suggest virtuozzo as the recent developments with HyperVM render it exploitable</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? : toprankedhostingreviews.com</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-841194</link> <dc:creator>Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? : toprankedhostingreviews.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:55:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-841194</guid> <description>[...] Continue reading here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephanie Elizabeth</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-836038</link> <dc:creator>Stephanie Elizabeth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:05:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-836038</guid> <description>That was an excellent post with some great information. We published some information on this topic too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an excellent post with some great information. We published some information on this topic too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#124; WEBMASTERLIB.COM</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-828299</link> <dc:creator>Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#124; WEBMASTERLIB.COM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:28:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-828299</guid> <description>[...] Read at :  HERE [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read at :  HERE [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#124; witchwebhost</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-827621</link> <dc:creator>Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#124; witchwebhost</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-827621</guid> <description>[...] Original post: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Beecher Bowers</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-826730</link> <dc:creator>Beecher Bowers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:46:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-826730</guid> <description>There are actually three types of hosting, and your article kind of blurs them into two.
First, there is shared hosting. Shared hosting has each clients&#039; (client is the person purchasing shared hosting) sites &quot;jailed&quot; into their own hosting environment. This environment can&#039;t affect the software configuration of other clients, but it shares the CPU and memory resources with the all of other clients hosting on that server. This is the cheapest option
Second, there is virtual hosting. Virtual hosting takes a large, high-end physical server (host server) and splits it into multiple virtual private servers. Each virtual private server(VPS) has its own CPU allocation, memory allocation, and disk space in its own environment. No VPS (if the hosting company has allocated correctly) can impact any other VPS on the host server. You pay by the CPU and memory allocation, typically. Disk space isn&#039;t that expensive. An example of this type of hosting is http://www.slicehost.com and no, I&#039;m not affiliated in any way.
Third, there is the dedicated server, which as it sounds is a complete physical server with all resources dedicated to the client.
VPS and dedicated hosting typically both require the client to have good knowledge of how a web server is configured, run and diagnosed(in the event of a problem). Most VPS and dedicated hosting packages include the nuclear option of a reset to defaults switch that resets the server to the way it was originally.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are actually three types of hosting, and your article kind of blurs them into two.</p><p>First, there is shared hosting. Shared hosting has each clients&#8217; (client is the person purchasing shared hosting) sites &#8220;jailed&#8221; into their own hosting environment. This environment can&#8217;t affect the software configuration of other clients, but it shares the CPU and memory resources with the all of other clients hosting on that server. This is the cheapest option</p><p>Second, there is virtual hosting. Virtual hosting takes a large, high-end physical server (host server) and splits it into multiple virtual private servers. Each virtual private server(VPS) has its own CPU allocation, memory allocation, and disk space in its own environment. No VPS (if the hosting company has allocated correctly) can impact any other VPS on the host server. You pay by the CPU and memory allocation, typically. Disk space isn&#8217;t that expensive. An example of this type of hosting is http://www.slicehost.com and no, I&#8217;m not affiliated in any way.</p><p>Third, there is the dedicated server, which as it sounds is a complete physical server with all resources dedicated to the client.</p><p>VPS and dedicated hosting typically both require the client to have good knowledge of how a web server is configured, run and diagnosed(in the event of a problem). Most VPS and dedicated hosting packages include the nuclear option of a reset to defaults switch that resets the server to the way it was originally.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michelle Schneider</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-826664</link> <dc:creator>Michelle Schneider</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:38:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-826664</guid> <description>I vote for dedicated with RAID, for developers VPS can be great answer</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for dedicated with RAID, for developers VPS can be great answer</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#171; Hosting U</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-826461</link> <dc:creator>Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#171; Hosting U</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:16:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-826461</guid> <description>[...] reading here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?              &#171; WTS Fast Hosting - Shared Hosting - Reseller Hosting - 99.9 &#8230;Free and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?              &laquo; WTS Fast Hosting &#8211; Shared Hosting &#8211; Reseller Hosting &#8211; 99.9 &#8230;Free and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Best Rated Web Hosting - Best Web Hosting 2009 &#124; Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-826434</link> <dc:creator>Best Rated Web Hosting - Best Web Hosting 2009 &#124; Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-826434</guid> <description>[...] View original post here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original post here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#124; The Web Hostings</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-826424</link> <dc:creator>Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? &#124; The Web Hostings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:41:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-826424</guid> <description>[...] Read more here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more here: Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Web Hosting Review and the affiliate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/14/should-you-try-virtual-or-dedicated-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-826332</link> <dc:creator>Web Hosting Review and the affiliate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:01:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13482#comment-826332</guid> <description>[...] the original post here:  Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?        Tags: browsing, business, dedicated-hosting, dedicated-server, entertainment, firefox, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here:  Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?        Tags: browsing, business, dedicated-hosting, dedicated-server, entertainment, firefox, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
