<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: kevin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-952256</link> <dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:31:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-952256</guid> <description>Recently, I came up with Puggle (http://puggle.sourceforge.net). It&#039;s open-source and very promising application.
It has a wonderful user interface and runs pretty fast in both windows and linux!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I came up with Puggle (http://puggle.sourceforge.net). It&#8217;s open-source and very promising application.<br
/> It has a wonderful user interface and runs pretty fast in both windows and linux!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leon</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-874860</link> <dc:creator>leon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:16:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-874860</guid> <description>docfetcher, google, WDS...I tried them all, but the best search tool is without any doubts lookeen! unbelievable fast, very accurate, great handling and lots of filters and functions. just to mention some features: as lookeen being an outlook add-in, you can search very comfortable your mails plus attachments in multiple (!) PST-files. lookeen is compatible with microsoft exchange servers and offers the use of an  shared index (to spare system resources)...no other prog offers  so many features.
www.lookeen.net
leon</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>docfetcher, google, WDS&#8230;I tried them all, but the best search tool is without any doubts lookeen! unbelievable fast, very accurate, great handling and lots of filters and functions. just to mention some features: as lookeen being an outlook add-in, you can search very comfortable your mails plus attachments in multiple (!) PST-files. lookeen is compatible with microsoft exchange servers and offers the use of an  shared index (to spare system resources)&#8230;no other prog offers  so many features.</p><p>www.lookeen.net</p><p>leon</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Buscador de Escritorio Código Abierto &#124; POWERPYMES</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-830453</link> <dc:creator>Buscador de Escritorio Código Abierto &#124; POWERPYMES</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-830453</guid> <description>[...] gHacks    (0) Comentarios&#160;&#160;&#160; Leer mas&#160;&#160;&#160;            Agrega un [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gHacks    (0) Comentarios&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Leer mas&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;            Agrega un [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-829270</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:10:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-829270</guid> <description>@ Jeff:
Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names. DocFetcher, Google Desktop, Copernic, etc. on the other hand perform full text extraction. That&#039;s why Everything is faster.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jeff:<br
/> Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names. DocFetcher, Google Desktop, Copernic, etc. on the other hand perform full text extraction. That&#8217;s why Everything is faster.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-826638</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-826638</guid> <description>&quot;...advantage of this method is that the program uses less system resources and is able to offer a better result quality...&quot;
Compared with Everything?
Speed?
Resources?
Set up?
Everything?
Please do explain.
If Everything indexes in minutes in a small space and searches instantly with 0 to no impact on resources, why should one restrict search to pre-selected folders?  Throw the whole HD at Everything and be done with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;advantage of this method is that the program uses less system resources and is able to offer a better result quality&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>Compared with Everything?</p><p>Speed?<br
/> Resources?<br
/> Set up?<br
/> Everything?</p><p>Please do explain.</p><p>If Everything indexes in minutes in a small space and searches instantly with 0 to no impact on resources, why should one restrict search to pre-selected folders?  Throw the whole HD at Everything and be done with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher &#124; Mash Central</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-818851</link> <dc:creator>Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher &#124; Mash Central</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:11:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-818851</guid> <description>[...] See the rest here:  Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here:  Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Palmar</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/comment-page-1/#comment-818822</link> <dc:creator>Robert Palmar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:24:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-818822</guid> <description>I like the concept.
I don&#039;t like the Java Runtime.
I&#039;m allergic to the .NET Framework too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept.<br
/> I don&#8217;t like the Java Runtime.<br
/> I&#8217;m allergic to the .NET Framework too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
