Comments on: Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/ A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:51:56 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: leon http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/#comment-874860 leon Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:16:42 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-874860 docfetcher, google, WDS...I tried them all, but the best search tool is without any doubts lookeen! unbelievable fast, very accurate, great handling and lots of filters and functions. just to mention some features: as lookeen being an outlook add-in, you can search very comfortable your mails plus attachments in multiple (!) PST-files. lookeen is compatible with microsoft exchange servers and offers the use of an shared index (to spare system resources)...no other prog offers so many features. www.lookeen.net leon docfetcher, google, WDS…I tried them all, but the best search tool is without any doubts lookeen! unbelievable fast, very accurate, great handling and lots of filters and functions. just to mention some features: as lookeen being an outlook add-in, you can search very comfortable your mails plus attachments in multiple (!) PST-files. lookeen is compatible with microsoft exchange servers and offers the use of an shared index (to spare system resources)…no other prog offers so many features.

http://www.lookeen.net

leon

]]> By: Buscador de Escritorio Código Abierto | POWERPYMES http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/#comment-830453 Buscador de Escritorio Código Abierto | POWERPYMES Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:06:32 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-830453 [...] gHacks (0) Comentarios    Leer mas    Agrega un [...] [...] gHacks (0) Comentarios    Leer mas    Agrega un [...]

]]> By: Patrick http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/#comment-829270 Patrick Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:10:54 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-829270 @ Jeff: Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names. DocFetcher, Google Desktop, Copernic, etc. on the other hand perform full text extraction. That's why Everything is faster. @ Jeff:
Everything does not search file contents, only file and folder names. DocFetcher, Google Desktop, Copernic, etc. on the other hand perform full text extraction. That’s why Everything is faster.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/#comment-826638 Jeff Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:52:30 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-826638 "...advantage of this method is that the program uses less system resources and is able to offer a better result quality..." Compared with Everything? Speed? Resources? Set up? Everything? Please do explain. If Everything indexes in minutes in a small space and searches instantly with 0 to no impact on resources, why should one restrict search to pre-selected folders? Throw the whole HD at Everything and be done with it. “…advantage of this method is that the program uses less system resources and is able to offer a better result quality…”

Compared with Everything?

Speed?
Resources?
Set up?
Everything?

Please do explain.

If Everything indexes in minutes in a small space and searches instantly with 0 to no impact on resources, why should one restrict search to pre-selected folders? Throw the whole HD at Everything and be done with it.

]]> By: Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher | Mash Central http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/#comment-818851 Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher | Mash Central Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:11:39 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-818851 [...] See the rest here:  Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher [...] [...] See the rest here:  Desktop Search Engine DocFetcher [...]

]]> By: Robert Palmar http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/08/desktop-search-engine-docfetcher/#comment-818822 Robert Palmar Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:24:29 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13391#comment-818822 I like the concept. I don't like the Java Runtime. I'm allergic to the .NET Framework too. I like the concept.
I don’t like the Java Runtime.
I’m allergic to the .NET Framework too.

]]>