<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Windows Defender</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: ingilizce çeviri</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-2/#comment-1352078</link> <dc:creator>ingilizce çeviri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 00:58:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1352078</guid> <description>I prefer Kaspersky.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer Kaspersky.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vivek</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1344877</link> <dc:creator>vivek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:52:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1344877</guid> <description>it is imp</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is imp</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1344410</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1344410</guid> <description>Not a Windows Defender fan.
I use 360 and Avast.Not sure if that is sufficient enough.Thinking about getting Kaspersky.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a Windows Defender fan.<br
/> I use 360 and Avast.Not sure if that is sufficient enough.Thinking about getting Kaspersky.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bilgi</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1327705</link> <dc:creator>bilgi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 05:42:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1327705</guid> <description>i would like windows defender</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like windows defender</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dovana</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1314082</link> <dc:creator>Dovana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:51:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1314082</guid> <description>In my opinion, the best spyware is avast. It works perfect on my pc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the best spyware is avast. It works perfect on my pc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arapça türkçe çeviri</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1284447</link> <dc:creator>arapça türkçe çeviri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:56:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1284447</guid> <description>i don&#039;t use any specific antispyware, currently running avast home for protection.
arapça çeviri</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t use any specific antispyware, currently running avast home for protection.</p><p>arapça çeviri</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paskola Kreditas</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1275773</link> <dc:creator>Paskola Kreditas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:37:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1275773</guid> <description>Many antivirus software if have anti-spyware module is alerting to switch off windows defender. This to me is very strange, because I always wanna to increase more the security of my PC. I think this is marketing step of antivirus software vendors to decrease popularity of others similar products.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many antivirus software if have anti-spyware module is alerting to switch off windows defender. This to me is very strange, because I always wanna to increase more the security of my PC. I think this is marketing step of antivirus software vendors to decrease popularity of others similar products.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: High PC Security With Windows Defender</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1272675</link> <dc:creator>High PC Security With Windows Defender</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1272675</guid> <description>[...] Windows Defenderis also featured with UAC integrated privacy options which requires administrator privileges for viewing history. Rather than wait for the scan to complete, it takes action against detected files. Besides, it also deletes and views individual items/files. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Defenderis also featured with UAC integrated privacy options which requires administrator privileges for viewing history. Rather than wait for the scan to complete, it takes action against detected files. Besides, it also deletes and views individual items/files. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arapça tercüme</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1242610</link> <dc:creator>arapça tercüme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1242610</guid> <description>i was never really a fan of defender and this makes me glad that i dont use defender</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was never really a fan of defender and this makes me glad that i dont use defender</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1240035</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1240035</guid> <description>I got a bad virise called quick defender if I go on the web I see sites that tell how to get rid of it but I dont know if I can trust them I have malwareby anti malware  and windows defender I ran both but they wount get rid of it any suggestions I dont know much about computers I am only 11 can you help thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a bad virise called quick defender if I go on the web I see sites that tell how to get rid of it but I dont know if I can trust them I have malwareby anti malware  and windows defender I ran both but they wount get rid of it any suggestions I dont know much about computers I am only 11 can you help thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gazeteler</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1218524</link> <dc:creator>gazeteler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1218524</guid> <description>patants on their software. You can’t get it free unless they give it to you free (and in that case, you might guess there are probably strings attached. But, hey, it’s free. What did you expect?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patants on their software. You can’t get it free unless they give it to you free (and in that case, you might guess there are probably strings attached. But, hey, it’s free. What did you expect?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ALI AL HADDAD</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1218251</link> <dc:creator>ALI AL HADDAD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:12:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1218251</guid> <description>thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1167809</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 07:40:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1167809</guid> <description>McAfee is probably not the best choice when it comes to protecting a system. Far better choices are available, take a look here http://www.ghacks.net/2010/08/20/the-2010-anti-virus-league-tables-are-out/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McAfee is probably not the best choice when it comes to protecting a system. Far better choices are available, take a look here http://www.ghacks.net/2010/08/20/the-2010-anti-virus-league-tables-are-out/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Use Windows Defender to protect your computer &#171; Technology News</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1167753</link> <dc:creator>Use Windows Defender to protect your computer &#171; Technology News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:40:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1167753</guid> <description>[...] Microsoft Update, Pc Checkup, Windows Defender  If you wish your computer then go in with the windows defender. With the help of the windows defender, you can ensure that the virus does not get into your system [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Update, Pc Checkup, Windows Defender  If you wish your computer then go in with the windows defender. With the help of the windows defender, you can ensure that the virus does not get into your system [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Freeman</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1167410</link> <dc:creator>Peter Freeman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1167410</guid> <description>Okay, I&#039;m not an expert in this field, but ... I&#039;ve got Windows Defender (&#039;cos it was free, natch) and McAfee (came with the broadband package, so also effectively free). They both run on this old XP, which struggles with McAfee because it only has 512Mb of memory. McAfee is a resource-hungry suite of programs; Defender seems to be far more compact - yes, I know it covers a more limited range of functions, but I get the impression that the McAfee code is careless in its freeing of memory.
The main difference seems to be that Defender scans mainly Windows-related programs, processes, and files, and checks their registry settings for problems. If you have 3rd-party software which isn&#039;t running, Defender seems to ignore it. It will detect, I guess, any malware problems which have affected those parts of the system that Microsoft considers to be important. That&#039;s fine, no problem there. McAfee AV is either more thorough or a whole lot less efficient, because its full scan takes about twice as long as Defender&#039;s on my machine. However, McAfee certainly detected and removed the Conficker worm that came back on a USB memory stick that I had been using to save files when working at the local library (hint : clusters like these may not be running AV software on their machines, they rely on a clean re-installation at the start of the day. After that you&#039;re at the mercy of whoever used the PC before you).
So the question of either/or may not be the right question to ask : perhaps it ought to be, with which other AV software is Defender compatible? Do they interact with each other in ways which degrade your machine&#039;s performance?
And, to pick up on a comment made earlier in this thread : what&#039;s wrong with Microsoft packages?  I trust the source, and Microsoft is usually very quick to release fixes for known problems - unlike (if their user forums are anything to go by) McAfee. I&#039;m not sure I quite trust Microsoft&#039;s policy of gathering data about your platform, installed software, software usage and so forth, but I put that down to corporate paranoia and jealousy over intellectual property rights and patants on their software. You can&#039;t get it free unless they give it to you free (and in that case, you might guess there are probably strings attached. But, hey, it&#039;s free. What did you expect?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m not an expert in this field, but &#8230; I&#8217;ve got Windows Defender (&#8216;cos it was free, natch) and McAfee (came with the broadband package, so also effectively free). They both run on this old XP, which struggles with McAfee because it only has 512Mb of memory. McAfee is a resource-hungry suite of programs; Defender seems to be far more compact &#8211; yes, I know it covers a more limited range of functions, but I get the impression that the McAfee code is careless in its freeing of memory.<br
/> The main difference seems to be that Defender scans mainly Windows-related programs, processes, and files, and checks their registry settings for problems. If you have 3rd-party software which isn&#8217;t running, Defender seems to ignore it. It will detect, I guess, any malware problems which have affected those parts of the system that Microsoft considers to be important. That&#8217;s fine, no problem there. McAfee AV is either more thorough or a whole lot less efficient, because its full scan takes about twice as long as Defender&#8217;s on my machine. However, McAfee certainly detected and removed the Conficker worm that came back on a USB memory stick that I had been using to save files when working at the local library (hint : clusters like these may not be running AV software on their machines, they rely on a clean re-installation at the start of the day. After that you&#8217;re at the mercy of whoever used the PC before you).<br
/> So the question of either/or may not be the right question to ask : perhaps it ought to be, with which other AV software is Defender compatible? Do they interact with each other in ways which degrade your machine&#8217;s performance?</p><p>And, to pick up on a comment made earlier in this thread : what&#8217;s wrong with Microsoft packages?  I trust the source, and Microsoft is usually very quick to release fixes for known problems &#8211; unlike (if their user forums are anything to go by) McAfee. I&#8217;m not sure I quite trust Microsoft&#8217;s policy of gathering data about your platform, installed software, software usage and so forth, but I put that down to corporate paranoia and jealousy over intellectual property rights and patants on their software. You can&#8217;t get it free unless they give it to you free (and in that case, you might guess there are probably strings attached. But, hey, it&#8217;s free. What did you expect?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Picture Project Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using Registry Cleaner to SpeedUp Windows 7</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1153693</link> <dc:creator>Picture Project Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using Registry Cleaner to SpeedUp Windows 7</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:52:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1153693</guid> <description>[...] Mustang Wheels &#124; Windows Defender [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mustang Wheels | Windows Defender [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ville of Decoration &#187; Home Lighting Tips For Home Improvement</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1129826</link> <dc:creator>Ville of Decoration &#187; Home Lighting Tips For Home Improvement</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:03:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1129826</guid> <description>[...] Windows Defender&#124;Furniture Stores NJr [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Defender|Furniture Stores NJr [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: INSURANCE INFORMATION &#187; Relieve Your Aching Back</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1129825</link> <dc:creator>INSURANCE INFORMATION &#187; Relieve Your Aching Back</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:02:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1129825</guid> <description>[...] Windows Defender&#124;Furniture Stores NJr [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows Defender|Furniture Stores NJr [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Filestube &#124; Mediafire Search Engine Blog</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1110753</link> <dc:creator>Filestube &#124; Mediafire Search Engine Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 05:41:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1110753</guid> <description>[...] The Author is a presently writing for Paragon Drive Backup and Windows Defender. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Author is a presently writing for Paragon Drive Backup and Windows Defender. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: çeviri</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/comment-page-1/#comment-1056460</link> <dc:creator>çeviri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:10:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/29/windows-defender/#comment-1056460</guid> <description>I dont like defender. I live Kaspersky. My best protection software.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont like defender. I live Kaspersky. My best protection software.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
