<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disk Defragmenting Software Ultra Defrag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:42:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Defragmentador Alternativo &#124; POWERPYMES</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-813887</link>
		<dc:creator>Defragmentador Alternativo &#124; POWERPYMES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-813887</guid>
		<description>[...] ghacks    &#160;&#160;&#160; Leer mas&#160;&#160;&#160;            Agrega un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ghacks    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Leer mas&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;            Agrega un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JungleCat</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-803201</link>
		<dc:creator>JungleCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-803201</guid>
		<description>Nope, none of the free utilities defrag the MFT as far as I am aware. I don&#039;t find them much of an improvement over the default Windows defragger.

I use Diskeeper 2009 Pro, and it does defrag the MFT, and does so even when running in automatic mode. It&#039;s set and forget- install and configure it and there is nothing more to do..Diskeeper defrags in the background automatically as necessary. Ofcourse, it&#039;s not free, but I find the auto defrag plus its other powerful features very useful for the 5 drives in my XP desktop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, none of the free utilities defrag the MFT as far as I am aware. I don&#8217;t find them much of an improvement over the default Windows defragger.</p>
<p>I use Diskeeper 2009 Pro, and it does defrag the MFT, and does so even when running in automatic mode. It&#8217;s set and forget- install and configure it and there is nothing more to do..Diskeeper defrags in the background automatically as necessary. Ofcourse, it&#8217;s not free, but I find the auto defrag plus its other powerful features very useful for the 5 drives in my XP desktop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-801113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 04:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-801113</guid>
		<description>I use JKDefrag also.  I run it 3 times a week while I am sleeping.

The only real deficiency in the program is that it does not defrag the MFT area.  Do any of these other free utilities do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use JKDefrag also.  I run it 3 times a week while I am sleeping.</p>
<p>The only real deficiency in the program is that it does not defrag the MFT area.  Do any of these other free utilities do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deano fabaza</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800796</link>
		<dc:creator>deano fabaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800796</guid>
		<description>Another vote for JKDefrag! Great program and does a very good job, also agree that it speeds up after the first run. My vista 64bit pc did not like it though. The program ran fine but caused vista to boot really slow and I don&#039;t think system restore liked the files being moved around. My hard drive space went down big time after running it, which i think was something to do with system restore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another vote for JKDefrag! Great program and does a very good job, also agree that it speeds up after the first run. My vista 64bit pc did not like it though. The program ran fine but caused vista to boot really slow and I don&#8217;t think system restore liked the files being moved around. My hard drive space went down big time after running it, which i think was something to do with system restore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Womble</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800665</link>
		<dc:creator>Womble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800665</guid>
		<description>I agree, im a big fan of Jkdefrag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, im a big fan of Jkdefrag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saurabh</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800627</link>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800627</guid>
		<description>@Womble Yes jkdefrag is slower than many other defraggers in the initial defrag but there is usually a noticeable increase in speed from the second time onwards. It is rare that defragging takes me more than 10 mins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Womble Yes jkdefrag is slower than many other defraggers in the initial defrag but there is usually a noticeable increase in speed from the second time onwards. It is rare that defragging takes me more than 10 mins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Womble</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800505</link>
		<dc:creator>Womble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 12:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800505</guid>
		<description>Given that most defrag tools are built using the Windows defrag engine you might want to bare in mind that the only way to defrag faster for those tools is likely to be by lowering the bar in the quality the of the defragmentation. 

Look at JKdefrag, they openly use Windows defrag engine but because they raise the quality bar it&#039;s often actually slower than Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that most defrag tools are built using the Windows defrag engine you might want to bare in mind that the only way to defrag faster for those tools is likely to be by lowering the bar in the quality the of the defragmentation. </p>
<p>Look at JKdefrag, they openly use Windows defrag engine but because they raise the quality bar it&#8217;s often actually slower than Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saurabh</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800454</link>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800454</guid>
		<description>I use jkdefrag and am thoroughly impressed with it. Even if you don&#039;t use it the website is a wonderful resource to learn about the defragmentation process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use jkdefrag and am thoroughly impressed with it. Even if you don&#8217;t use it the website is a wonderful resource to learn about the defragmentation process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mule</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800451</link>
		<dc:creator>mule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800451</guid>
		<description>System wide, effective defragmentation of windows systems involves more than an effective defrag tool. Personally, for XP, I first disable system restore, paging, and set recylcler to 0 and reboot. I then defrag and then set page file back to a fixed size at least double the physical RAM. I then restore system restore and recycler settings.

Just my .02

mule</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>System wide, effective defragmentation of windows systems involves more than an effective defrag tool. Personally, for XP, I first disable system restore, paging, and set recylcler to 0 and reboot. I then defrag and then set page file back to a fixed size at least double the physical RAM. I then restore system restore and recycler settings.</p>
<p>Just my .02</p>
<p>mule</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800448</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800448</guid>
		<description>Dont work on my Windows 7 x64 as it needs to install a unsigned (!) driver -on the portable version, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont work on my Windows 7 x64 as it needs to install a unsigned (!) driver -on the portable version, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulus</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/23/disk-defragmenting-software-ultra-defrag/#comment-800376</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 09:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=13025#comment-800376</guid>
		<description>Why did you not put up the link for Ultra Defrag 3.1  http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/ ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you not put up the link for Ultra Defrag 3.1  <a href="http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://ultradefrag.sourceforge.net/</a> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
