So – I’m agree with you:
It is a Google Killer? No, definitely not. It does however provide better results than other search engines for results that can be computed mathematically.

I am a refugee from Belgium.

I entered “Belgium”.

Here’s part of what I got:
languages | Dutch (40%) | French (35%) | Walloon (9.7%) | Vlaams (9.2%) | Limburgisch (5.2%)

Yes, it’s been nine years that I had to flee from there,
but the latter three languages simply do NOT exist.
Yes, some (most?) people who speak Dutch say they speak Vlaams.
Some others (French speakers) may say they speak Walloon.
But you will be very hard pressed to meet somebody, except a student perhaps, who says she speaks Limburgisch.
But my information is nine years old, of course.
And I am either phenomenally dense or some sort of spambot.

I don’t accept Wolfram Alpha as a source.

This is not curating data.
This is creating data.

The engine does not even mention that the official (not just spoken like Vlaams, Walloon and … Limburgisch) language of six villages in Belgium is German.

But I am either phenomenally dense or some sort of spambot.

No,
the thief does not come back periodically,
nor does he pretend to be stealing in the public interest

A = 2l + 2w is objective.

“How much area is too much?” is subjective.

What’s objective?

Yes, logic is an arcane science.

Censorship is not even a science, think.

Truth is ad-equation between the thing and the intellect (adaequatio rei et intellectus), said Thomas Aquinas.

A lot will depend, I think, on whether the various sources from which the search engine will calculate the results and give the answers will have been filtered,
that is,
whether some sites will have been blocked, like Google does,
or whether the intellect will be allowed to be freely led to the conclusions to which its inferences lead the intellect.

“It clearly states that they want to collect and curate objective data only which limits the search range drastically”

When they arrive at so-called evidences, most people substitute reasoning with faith or belief.

Will the engine also do that, thereby refusing to think mathematically or rather refusing to think logically?

Next question is of course: How come the conclusions of the intellect, such as E=MC2, are applicable in or to reality? I don’t yet know the answer to that question but I am “only” 47 years old. And who knows, Wolfram Alpha may have the answer.

“It clearly states that they want to collect and curate objective data only which limits the search range drastically”