<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Get to know Linux: IceWM</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Relst</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-866974</link> <dc:creator>Relst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-866974</guid> <description>I&#039;ve switched to IceWM recently, and it it together with JWM the fastest and most stable
WM i&#039;ve ever used.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve switched to IceWM recently, and it it together with JWM the fastest and most stable<br
/> WM i&#8217;ve ever used.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sridhar Sarnobat</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-820741</link> <dc:creator>Sridhar Sarnobat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-820741</guid> <description>I love Ice WM. End of story. And yes, the fact that I rarely have to take my hands off the keyboard is a large part of the reason.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Ice WM. End of story. And yes, the fact that I rarely have to take my hands off the keyboard is a large part of the reason.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: onli</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-795605</link> <dc:creator>onli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-795605</guid> <description>You can get rid of the Taskbar/Panel by setting ShowTaskBar=0. IceWM has a lot of configuration-options, I would never call it static. You just need to get to know the possibilites.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get rid of the Taskbar/Panel by setting ShowTaskBar=0. IceWM has a lot of configuration-options, I would never call it static. You just need to get to know the possibilites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Links 13/05/2009: Fedora 11 is Near, GNU Hackers Meeting in Gothenburg &#124; Boycott Novell</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-790000</link> <dc:creator>Links 13/05/2009: Fedora 11 is Near, GNU Hackers Meeting in Gothenburg &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 01:08:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-790000</guid> <description>[...] Get to know Linux: IceWM IceWM is a very clean desktop and, even though it is not highly configurable, it is a fairly serviceable desktop. With that in mind let’s take a look at what most will consider a blast from the past. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Get to know Linux: IceWM IceWM is a very clean desktop and, even though it is not highly configurable, it is a fairly serviceable desktop. With that in mind let’s take a look at what most will consider a blast from the past. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Celettu</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-789222</link> <dc:creator>Celettu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-789222</guid> <description>Dezza: not the point. It doesn&#039;t have to look like Vista, just like it doesn&#039;t have to look like the screenshot in this article. There are some very nice themes available.
Your other claims about it being static or not lightweight don&#039;t make any sense to me. About the only thing I can&#039;t think of is that I don&#039;t know how to get rid of the panel. Otherwise, everything can be customised, just like in Openbox.
I&#039;ve used both on an old system, and didn&#039;t notice any difference speedwise. It&#039;s certainly much closer to Openbox than it is to XFCE, GNOME or KDE.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dezza: not the point. It doesn&#8217;t have to look like Vista, just like it doesn&#8217;t have to look like the screenshot in this article. There are some very nice themes available.<br
/> Your other claims about it being static or not lightweight don&#8217;t make any sense to me. About the only thing I can&#8217;t think of is that I don&#8217;t know how to get rid of the panel. Otherwise, everything can be customised, just like in Openbox.<br
/> I&#8217;ve used both on an old system, and didn&#8217;t notice any difference speedwise. It&#8217;s certainly much closer to Openbox than it is to XFCE, GNOME or KDE.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dezza</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-788590</link> <dc:creator>dezza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:33:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-788590</guid> <description>Celettu: If Vista seems pretty to anyone yes ..
I used IceWM as the first Window-Manager ever even before I used GNOME or KDE.
I honestly didn&#039;t like it, it&#039;s very static you can&#039;t do any major changes to it, far too little customization.
And it ain&#039;t that lightweight, I would say Openbox is far more lightweight, which is my current WM.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celettu: If Vista seems pretty to anyone yes ..</p><p>I used IceWM as the first Window-Manager ever even before I used GNOME or KDE.</p><p>I honestly didn&#8217;t like it, it&#8217;s very static you can&#8217;t do any major changes to it, far too little customization.</p><p>And it ain&#8217;t that lightweight, I would say Openbox is far more lightweight, which is my current WM.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Celettu</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-788367</link> <dc:creator>Celettu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:43:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-788367</guid> <description>IceWm can be made as pretty as you want it to be.
Just have a look here: http://celettu.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/making-that-old-pc-useful/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IceWm can be made as pretty as you want it to be.</p><p>Just have a look here: http://celettu.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/making-that-old-pc-useful/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Agung Prastowo&#8217;s Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Get to know Linux: IceWM</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/13/get-to-know-linux-icewm/comment-page-1/#comment-788104</link> <dc:creator>Agung Prastowo&#8217;s Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Get to know Linux: IceWM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:40:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12772#comment-788104</guid> <description>[...] Read the original here:  Get to know Linux: IceWM [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original here:  Get to know Linux: IceWM [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
