<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Get to know Linux: Fluxbox</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Get to know Linux: IceWM</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-787693</link> <dc:creator>Get to know Linux: IceWM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:52:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-787693</guid> <description>[...] far, in this series, we have taken a look at FluxBox, Window Maker, and Xfce 4. We&#8217;ve even examined adding a little eye candy to these old school [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far, in this series, we have taken a look at FluxBox, Window Maker, and Xfce 4. We&#8217;ve even examined adding a little eye candy to these old school [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adding dropshadows in Fluxbox with xcompmgr</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-780818</link> <dc:creator>Adding dropshadows in Fluxbox with xcompmgr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-780818</guid> <description>[...] I have been covering various window managers and desktops for Linux. So far you can read about Fluxbox, Window Maker, and Xfce 4. These desktops and window managers are solid entries in the Linux [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been covering various window managers and desktops for Linux. So far you can read about Fluxbox, Window Maker, and Xfce 4. These desktops and window managers are solid entries in the Linux [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Get to know Linux: Xfce 4</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-776430</link> <dc:creator>Get to know Linux: Xfce 4</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:01:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-776430</guid> <description>[...] managers and desktops. Most of them are old school and still very relevant. We&#8217;ve examined Fluxbox and Window Maker so far. Both of these are very lightweight and fast. Some of them are more modern [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] managers and desktops. Most of them are old school and still very relevant. We&#8217;ve examined Fluxbox and Window Maker so far. Both of these are very lightweight and fast. Some of them are more modern [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Get to know Linux: Fluxbox &#62;&#62; Fu4ny &#124; Fun for You</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-775511</link> <dc:creator>Get to know Linux: Fluxbox &#62;&#62; Fu4ny &#124; Fun for You</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:53:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-775511</guid> <description>[...] via Get to know Linux: Fluxbox. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Get to know Linux: Fluxbox. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pga</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-773690</link> <dc:creator>pga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-773690</guid> <description>I have two new, really powerful desktops &amp; I have converted to fluxbox.  KDE, XFCE, and GNOME gave me too much trouble:  especially the keyboard escapes that worked that I had configured before an upgrade that no longer worked.  And their configuration places were hidden.  That is highly unable to happen with fluxbox with its text configuration files.
So now I have the pain and suffering of typing
sudo mount /dev/sdc1 /tmp/mntpt
for my memory stick and camera card once in a while.  Tough.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two new, really powerful desktops &amp; I have converted to fluxbox.  KDE, XFCE, and GNOME gave me too much trouble:  especially the keyboard escapes that worked that I had configured before an upgrade that no longer worked.  And their configuration places were hidden.  That is highly unable to happen with fluxbox with its text configuration files.</p><p>So now I have the pain and suffering of typing<br
/> sudo mount /dev/sdc1 /tmp/mntpt<br
/> for my memory stick and camera card once in a while.  Tough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anders</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-773579</link> <dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-773579</guid> <description>Fluxbox is lovely. It was the first desktop I ever used under *nix and I have used it ever since. Tried Gnome and KDE a few times but in the end they just seem so bloated and uncustomizable. I&#039;m running fluxbox (under Debian) on my high-end desktop, so it&#039;s not about saving precious resources - the desktop/WM is just that lovely and stable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fluxbox is lovely. It was the first desktop I ever used under *nix and I have used it ever since. Tried Gnome and KDE a few times but in the end they just seem so bloated and uncustomizable. I&#8217;m running fluxbox (under Debian) on my high-end desktop, so it&#8217;s not about saving precious resources &#8211; the desktop/WM is just that lovely and stable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Get to know Linux: Window Maker</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-773490</link> <dc:creator>Get to know Linux: Window Maker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:19:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-773490</guid> <description>[...] Like Fluxbox (Covered recently in my Get to know Linux: Fluxbox article) the main menu can be accessed with a right mouse click on the desktop. This menu contains [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like Fluxbox (Covered recently in my Get to know Linux: Fluxbox article) the main menu can be accessed with a right mouse click on the desktop. This menu contains [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RogueSpear</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-771618</link> <dc:creator>RogueSpear</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:55:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-771618</guid> <description>I&#039;ve never tried Fluxbox under the *buntus, but it&#039;s wonderful under Arch.  I was surprised when I recently read about Fluxbox having descended from Blackbox.  I used to use Blackbox with Windows XP several years ago.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never tried Fluxbox under the *buntus, but it&#8217;s wonderful under Arch.  I was surprised when I recently read about Fluxbox having descended from Blackbox.  I used to use Blackbox with Windows XP several years ago.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Agung Prastowo&#8217;s Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Get to know Linux: Fluxbox</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-771162</link> <dc:creator>Agung Prastowo&#8217;s Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Get to know Linux: Fluxbox</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-771162</guid> <description>[...] See the original post here:  Get to know Linux: Fluxbox [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the original post here:  Get to know Linux: Fluxbox [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jack</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-771069</link> <dc:creator>jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:49:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-771069</guid> <description>Goh Mifune: I plan on doing just that. I will get through as many of the window managers as I can.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goh Mifune: I plan on doing just that. I will get through as many of the window managers as I can.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Goh Mifune</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/05/06/get-to-know-linux-fluxbox/comment-page-1/#comment-770965</link> <dc:creator>Goh Mifune</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:46:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12622#comment-770965</guid> <description>Fluxbox is amazing, but Fluxbox + Ubuntu can be a hassle to deal with considering the screen resolution issues that everyone seems to have. I hope you go through all the semi-major WMs, it would be a good read.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fluxbox is amazing, but Fluxbox + Ubuntu can be a hassle to deal with considering the screen resolution issues that everyone seems to have. I hope you go through all the semi-major WMs, it would be a good read.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
