<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Text XML Editor Intype</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/text-xml-editor-intype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/text-xml-editor-intype/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Steven</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/text-xml-editor-intype/comment-page-1/#comment-716889</link> <dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/text-xml-editor-intype/#comment-716889</guid> <description>I remember trying out Intype 0.3.1.547 about a year ago. I liked it but as I was used to Notepad++ because the release was still alpha, I never really did much with it. However, today I&#039;ve had to edit an xml file &amp; the code is unreadable in Notepad++ (not that N++ can&#039;t show xml properly, it&#039;s because the code I have is XHTML &amp; N++ is reading it as XML). I thought Intype may be able to deal with it so I re-ran it &amp; at first it looked the same as N++ (syntax colours as one long unreadable string) so I switched it over to read as XHTML in Intype &amp; it looks far more readable &amp; easier to work with.
See 2 shots of the same file in Intype &amp; N++
Notepad++ doesn&#039;t seem to have the XHTML language added (perhaps needs a plug-in ?), so at least Intype has a feature that N++ is missing.
Intype : http://i44.tinypic.com/nb7tja.jpg
Notepad++ : http://i42.tinypic.com/2ppkbk8.jpg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember trying out Intype 0.3.1.547 about a year ago. I liked it but as I was used to Notepad++ because the release was still alpha, I never really did much with it. However, today I&#8217;ve had to edit an xml file &amp; the code is unreadable in Notepad++ (not that N++ can&#8217;t show xml properly, it&#8217;s because the code I have is XHTML &amp; N++ is reading it as XML). I thought Intype may be able to deal with it so I re-ran it &amp; at first it looked the same as N++ (syntax colours as one long unreadable string) so I switched it over to read as XHTML in Intype &amp; it looks far more readable &amp; easier to work with.<br
/> See 2 shots of the same file in Intype &amp; N++<br
/> Notepad++ doesn&#8217;t seem to have the XHTML language added (perhaps needs a plug-in ?), so at least Intype has a feature that N++ is missing.</p><p>Intype : http://i44.tinypic.com/nb7tja.jpg<br
/> Notepad++ : http://i42.tinypic.com/2ppkbk8.jpg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DOOOMKULTUS</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/text-xml-editor-intype/comment-page-1/#comment-716629</link> <dc:creator>DOOOMKULTUS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:12:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/text-xml-editor-intype/#comment-716629</guid> <description>0.3.1.734 is the latest Unstable build available.But you are showing
0.3.1.824 ,how did you get it?
I think you took the screenshot from the blog about upcoming possible design of new Intype build,didn&#039;t you?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0.3.1.734 is the latest Unstable build available.But you are showing<br
/> 0.3.1.824 ,how did you get it?<br
/> I think you took the screenshot from the blog about upcoming possible design of new Intype build,didn&#8217;t you?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
