<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaspersky Application Vulnerability Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:51:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/#comment-871150</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10548#comment-871150</guid>
		<description>Kaspersky is the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaspersky is the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/#comment-643128</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10548#comment-643128</guid>
		<description>Bar none, NOD32 is the best of the best and has been for many years.  No useless false positives and the latest very is just about or the most effective for things &quot;in the wild&quot;, the heuristic beats the competition to shreads.  Who need a signature update when you&#039;re already infected?  The downer, you have to digest the less than user friendly interface ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bar none, NOD32 is the best of the best and has been for many years.  No useless false positives and the latest very is just about or the most effective for things &#8220;in the wild&#8221;, the heuristic beats the competition to shreads.  Who need a signature update when you&#8217;re already infected?  The downer, you have to digest the less than user friendly interface ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
