http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/ A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:08:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-1305023 Blogg'n @ ECI » Post Topic » Nagios “statuswml.cgi” Command Injection Vulnerability Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:25:53 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10548#comment-1305023 [...] Kaspersky Application Vulnerability Analysis (ghacks.net) [...] [...] Kaspersky Application Vulnerability Analysis (ghacks.net) [...]

]]> http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-871150 Calvin Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:58:52 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10548#comment-871150 Kaspersky is the best. Kaspersky is the best.

]]> http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/kaspersky-application-vulnerability-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-643128 Marc Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:18:56 +0000 http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10548#comment-643128 Bar none, NOD32 is the best of the best and has been for many years. No useless false positives and the latest very is just about or the most effective for things "in the wild", the heuristic beats the competition to shreads. Who need a signature update when you're already infected? The downer, you have to digest the less than user friendly interface ;) Bar none, NOD32 is the best of the best and has been for many years. No useless false positives and the latest very is just about or the most effective for things “in the wild”, the heuristic beats the competition to shreads. Who need a signature update when you’re already infected? The downer, you have to digest the less than user friendly interface ;)

]]>