<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Outlook Search</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Fix Outlook PST</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1029494</link> <dc:creator>Fix Outlook PST</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 05:20:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-1029494</guid> <description>Is that a software to repair outlook pst file</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a software to repair outlook pst file</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1001857</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-1001857</guid> <description>One feature that Lookeen has that is missing in Windows Search is the ability to index Outlook PST files that are not open. I have several archived PST files that I normally do not have open in Outlook. To get Lookeen to first become aware of a PST file, you do need to open it in Outlook. But once that is done, Lookeen retains (and even updates) the index information, including 1000 character previews of each item. So even with the archived PST file closed, Lookeen will find items, display previews, and then open the item (without the user needing to reattach the PST to Outlook). On the other hand, Windows Search deletes index information for any PST file that is no longer attached when Outlook is open.
On the downside, I have sent three questions to Lookeen support over the past three days. I have not yet received a single reply. Fortunately the issues were not show-stoppers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One feature that Lookeen has that is missing in Windows Search is the ability to index Outlook PST files that are not open. I have several archived PST files that I normally do not have open in Outlook. To get Lookeen to first become aware of a PST file, you do need to open it in Outlook. But once that is done, Lookeen retains (and even updates) the index information, including 1000 character previews of each item. So even with the archived PST file closed, Lookeen will find items, display previews, and then open the item (without the user needing to reattach the PST to Outlook). On the other hand, Windows Search deletes index information for any PST file that is no longer attached when Outlook is open.<br
/> On the downside, I have sent three questions to Lookeen support over the past three days. I have not yet received a single reply. Fortunately the issues were not show-stoppers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gabriela</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-914750</link> <dc:creator>Gabriela</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:00:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-914750</guid> <description>I am totally satisfied with http://www.lookeen.com! Great software!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am totally satisfied with http://www.lookeen.com! Great software!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stan</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-874769</link> <dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-874769</guid> <description>because lookout has no product support and isn´t developed, does´t work on vista, it can´t search in and for the new file formatof office 2007 like docx, xlsx etc.
The search of vista is slow, inaccurate and needs a lot of resouces...thats the reason why I have to problem to pay for lookeen!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because lookout has no product support and isn´t developed, does´t work on vista, it can´t search in and for the new file formatof office 2007 like docx, xlsx etc.<br
/> The search of vista is slow, inaccurate and needs a lot of resouces&#8230;thats the reason why I have to problem to pay for lookeen!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: deez</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-861470</link> <dc:creator>deez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:17:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-861470</guid> <description>Why WOULD you pay for lookeen when vista indexes eevrythigtn already?  Or lookout is for free?  IM lost here, people actually pay 40 dollars for a tool thats free?  WOoowa.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why WOULD you pay for lookeen when vista indexes eevrythigtn already?  Or lookout is for free?  IM lost here, people actually pay 40 dollars for a tool thats free?  WOoowa.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-801433</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 12:39:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-801433</guid> <description>Hey Dinesh and how do you like Lookeen??
I work with Lookeen too, because all trials to get Lookout work for Outlook 07 and Vista were for nothing!! It was only dissappointing!
So I find Lookeen is the best alternative for Lookout, it is even better! Because it is an modern, developed Tool with many good features!
Beside this, I think it makes no sense to work with a Tool which isn´t developed anymore, beause everthing is enhancing only Lookout stands still!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dinesh and how do you like Lookeen??</p><p>I work with Lookeen too, because all trials to get Lookout work for Outlook 07 and Vista were for nothing!! It was only dissappointing!<br
/> So I find Lookeen is the best alternative for Lookout, it is even better! Because it is an modern, developed Tool with many good features!<br
/> Beside this, I think it makes no sense to work with a Tool which isn´t developed anymore, beause everthing is enhancing only Lookout stands still!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-710198</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:55:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-710198</guid> <description>This drives me nuts :(. My computer used to break down after I installed lookout for outlook 2007. Some people said it works other said it wouldn´t work. Well, now I have lookeen and I like it, but still, I would like to know why it doesn´t work on my computer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This drives me nuts :(. My computer used to break down after I installed lookout for outlook 2007. Some people said it works other said it wouldn´t work. Well, now I have lookeen and I like it, but still, I would like to know why it doesn´t work on my computer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: santosh</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-707836</link> <dc:creator>santosh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:34:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-707836</guid> <description>How to search the email from sender name and date that I received before. Please teach me</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to search the email from sender name and date that I received before. Please teach me</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dinesh</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-659235</link> <dc:creator>Dinesh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:43:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-659235</guid> <description>I tried lookout, Xobni, and looken. Xobni is the most memory hog of all of them with least functionality. The reason why many people like xobnif or its pretty looks and its social features, it sucks in Search. Lookout is the best of email search tools. I use it against multiple pst files which are around 1.5 GB plus, overall it indexes data worth 4 GB, and it&#039;s performance is onne of the reasons is why i stick with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried lookout, Xobni, and looken. Xobni is the most memory hog of all of them with least functionality. The reason why many people like xobnif or its pretty looks and its social features, it sucks in Search. Lookout is the best of email search tools. I use it against multiple pst files which are around 1.5 GB plus, overall it indexes data worth 4 GB, and it&#8217;s performance is onne of the reasons is why i stick with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: benjamin miller</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-652816</link> <dc:creator>benjamin miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:07:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-652816</guid> <description>i also prefer lookeen compared to xnobi, because i also worked with lookout bevor and since this doesn´t work anymore lookeen is the best option for me! its so similar to lookout and just as reliable and fast as lookout!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i also prefer lookeen compared to xnobi, because i also worked with lookout bevor and since this doesn´t work anymore lookeen is the best option for me! its so similar to lookout and just as reliable and fast as lookout!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Channeling Emily&#8217;s transition &#124; AccMan</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-639680</link> <dc:creator>Channeling Emily&#8217;s transition &#124; AccMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-639680</guid> <description>[...] Microsoft Outlook Search (ghacks.net) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Outlook Search (ghacks.net) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve P.</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-638938</link> <dc:creator>Steve P.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-638938</guid> <description>Try Lookeen instead! Its the &#039;successor&#039; of LOOKOUT! It does one simple thing: SEARCH. As reliable and as stable as Lookout. Works under 2007 and is even faster!
http://www.lookeen.net</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try Lookeen instead! Its the &#8216;successor&#8217; of LOOKOUT! It does one simple thing: SEARCH. As reliable and as stable as Lookout. Works under 2007 and is even faster!</p><p>http://www.lookeen.net</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Managing email correctly - how to save hours a month!&#160;&#124;&#160;The 845 Club</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-616512</link> <dc:creator>Managing email correctly - how to save hours a month!&#160;&#124;&#160;The 845 Club</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-616512</guid> <description>[...] Microsoft Outlook Search [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Outlook Search [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-611122</link> <dc:creator>steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:57:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-611122</guid> <description>An even better solution is Xobni.
http://www.xobni.com/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An even better solution is Xobni.</p><p>http://www.xobni.com/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marc</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/17/microsoft-outlook-search/comment-page-1/#comment-610701</link> <dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9951#comment-610701</guid> <description>I&#039;ve used lookout for years and it works very nicely. If the pst gets too big (past 200mb) outlook will take forever to open if lookout is installed.  And if you index other locations than your pst, it becomes even slower and a major memory hog.  Lookout should be used for small pst and to index pst only, if you keep this in mind lookout is a God send.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used lookout for years and it works very nicely. If the pst gets too big (past 200mb) outlook will take forever to open if lookout is installed.  And if you index other locations than your pst, it becomes even slower and a major memory hog.  Lookout should be used for small pst and to index pst only, if you keep this in mind lookout is a God send.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
