<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Explorer Tool TrayProdder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:47:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dotan Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/#comment-613290</link>
		<dc:creator>Dotan Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9909#comment-613290</guid>
		<description>@todd: That is what KDE does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@todd: That is what KDE does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd schnitt</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/#comment-610957</link>
		<dc:creator>todd schnitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9909#comment-610957</guid>
		<description>This would have been perfect if there was an option to automatically select the files as you checkmark them. Having to bring up the program from the tray in order to &quot;Select all checked&quot; is an extra step that hardly makes things easier. Close but no cigar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would have been perfect if there was an option to automatically select the files as you checkmark them. Having to bring up the program from the tray in order to &#8220;Select all checked&#8221; is an extra step that hardly makes things easier. Close but no cigar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is KDE?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/#comment-608841</link>
		<dc:creator>What is KDE?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9909#comment-608841</guid>
		<description>KDE introduced the checkmarks in the filemanager with KDE 4.0, with was released just one year ago. The 4.2 implementation (coming out this month!) is downright amazing, it makes handling large amounts of files so simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KDE introduced the checkmarks in the filemanager with KDE 4.0, with was released just one year ago. The 4.2 implementation (coming out this month!) is downright amazing, it makes handling large amounts of files so simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/#comment-608081</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9909#comment-608081</guid>
		<description>This would be great if 1) It didn&#039;t use 8MB of RAM when running, and 2) didn&#039;t need the bloated .NET framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be great if 1) It didn&#8217;t use 8MB of RAM when running, and 2) didn&#8217;t need the bloated .NET framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Womble</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/15/windows-explorer-tool-trayprodder/#comment-607964</link>
		<dc:creator>Womble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9909#comment-607964</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little more versatile than CTRL+Click or shift+Click I imagine but as someone who&#039;s old school I couldn&#039;t justify the memory usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little more versatile than CTRL+Click or shift+Click I imagine but as someone who&#8217;s old school I couldn&#8217;t justify the memory usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
