<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimize Windows For Solid State Drives Usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:05:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SSD or not SSD, that&#8217;s the question &#124; SolSie.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/#comment-611796</link>
		<dc:creator>SSD or not SSD, that&#8217;s the question &#124; SolSie.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9781#comment-611796</guid>
		<description>[...] focusing on the Write cache, PIO and reallocate files that require intensive write operation, etc.. gHack has an excellent tutorial on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] focusing on the Write cache, PIO and reallocate files that require intensive write operation, etc.. gHack has an excellent tutorial on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/#comment-604059</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9781#comment-604059</guid>
		<description>LethAL, I&#039;m quoting Marin here, &quot;you reach the limit in about 50 years on a 64 GB drive and continuous never ending writes to the disk. Check this article http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html&quot; (http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/03/should-you-defragment-a-ssd/), so is longevity more particularly worth being taken into consideration on SSDs or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LethAL, I&#8217;m quoting Marin here, &#8220;you reach the limit in about 50 years on a 64 GB drive and continuous never ending writes to the disk. Check this article <a href="http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html</a>&#8221; (<a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/03/should-you-defragment-a-ssd/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/03/should-you-defragment-a-ssd/)</a>, so is longevity more particularly worth being taken into consideration on SSDs or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/#comment-603259</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9781#comment-603259</guid>
		<description>I just load the OS on SSDs.  Since the system run much faster on them.  I also Ghost the SSDs so that when they fail, I just drop in another SSD.  And since the OS is installed on the SSD, I don&#039;t need to do all these tweaks either - it&#039;s defaulted.  Often used programs are installed on another SSD and all others, including data directories are installed on SATA drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just load the OS on SSDs.  Since the system run much faster on them.  I also Ghost the SSDs so that when they fail, I just drop in another SSD.  And since the OS is installed on the SSD, I don&#8217;t need to do all these tweaks either &#8211; it&#8217;s defaulted.  Often used programs are installed on another SSD and all others, including data directories are installed on SATA drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LethAL</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/#comment-603137</link>
		<dc:creator>LethAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9781#comment-603137</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing specific to SSDs here; all this is good advice to users with mechanical hard drives as well. Perhaps you should rename it?

Also, moving the temp folder and page file will increase an SSD&#039;s longevity.

Also, if the hard drive you move things to is used a lot, you&#039;d be better off leaving things on the SSD as it the better ones can read multiple sectors at once and buffer them for sending to the host.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing specific to SSDs here; all this is good advice to users with mechanical hard drives as well. Perhaps you should rename it?</p>
<p>Also, moving the temp folder and page file will increase an SSD&#8217;s longevity.</p>
<p>Also, if the hard drive you move things to is used a lot, you&#8217;d be better off leaving things on the SSD as it the better ones can read multiple sectors at once and buffer them for sending to the host.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/#comment-603071</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9781#comment-603071</guid>
		<description>You might have misunderstood the intention of the article. It&#039;s not about the endurance of longevity of the SSDs but about system performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have misunderstood the intention of the article. It&#8217;s not about the endurance of longevity of the SSDs but about system performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Js Op de Beeck</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/10/optimize-windows-for-solid-state-drives-usage/#comment-603063</link>
		<dc:creator>Js Op de Beeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9781#comment-603063</guid>
		<description>See http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html for more about the ‘excessive writes wear out flash drives’ issue, which is mostly a myth at present. Basically you have to write evenly across whole SSD, as fast as possible and 24/7, to even have a chance of wearing it out, and it typically would take many years even with this unrealistic usage pattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html</a> for more about the ‘excessive writes wear out flash drives’ issue, which is mostly a myth at present. Basically you have to write evenly across whole SSD, as fast as possible and 24/7, to even have a chance of wearing it out, and it typically would take many years even with this unrealistic usage pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
