If you load to many applications during startup you might notice that this might delay the startup even further because of the system resources required to load the applications at the same time. A better way to deal with startup applications would be to load them in sequence instead ordered by level of priority.
Delayed Exec is a free software program to delay the execution of startup programs. It displays all applications that are started during system start including their title, command and the user.
Applications can be moved into the delayed startup applications table where they will be executed in order using the delay interval specified by the user. The delay interval is set in milliseconds, the default being 15000.
The startup software is compatible with Windows XP and Windows Vista. It requires the Microsoft .net Framework 3.5. An alternative to Delayed Exec is Startup Delayer which does not require the Microsoft .net Framework.
Read Related Posts
-
Delay Windows Startup to Speed Up Startup
-
Open Multiple Applications With A Single Click
-
Windows Startup Manager
-
Application Startup Timer
-
Windows Startup Speed Benchmark
-
New Rumors on PS3 delay
-
Block Software With AppLocker
-
Startup Control Panel and Startup Monitor
13 Responses to “Delay Startup Software”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
-
[...] moving a shortcut to the application into a Windows startup folder. This is an alternative to the startup software we covered earlier today. Like such posts? Get updates via RSS NEWS FEED. Love Ghacks? Find [...]
Where is the download link? Or a link to the site of the program?
Edit: humor not allowed
Yeah, where is the download link? I’ve already google searched for it and cant find any link.
:(
It’s there ;)
Where!?
Ups it did not take the change, now its there, sorry for that ;)
http://withinmymeans.blogvis.com/2008/12/17/open-sourced-freeware-delayedexec/
Have you tested it Martin? what are your thoughts?
Although I have no real experience to draw from here I can’t help but think how linux used to take minutes to start up because it loaded things up in sequence, they sped the whole thing up by loading things up symmetrically, or at least that how I understand it.
PS I use Windows, Linux isn’t mentioned in fanboy context :)
Well you won’t see a difference, or much of it, if you have a fast hard disk and few startup items. Putting them in sequence might help though, think of backup utilities or scanners that start a scan once they are loaded.
i tried it on older computer i have and some did make a difference. As Martin stated, if you do have a fast HD, really no difference is noticed.
I have discovered one value for this type of application that is not mentioned (and is the reason I use Startup Delayer).
I am running WinXP SP3 and have 32 processes showing in the tray area right now.
XP (at least; unsure of Vista since I don’t run it) has a long standing bug where icons in the tray don’t always show up after a reboot. The application tied to the icon IS running in the system but the tray icon does not display in the tray. So there is no way to access or control the related application.
The only 2 ways that I have found to solve this problem is to either logoff/logon the user account AFTER a full reboot when you have missing icons (a big waste of time) or run a startup delayer to ensure that everything starts sequentially.
The one problem with delayer apps is that you have to guess how much time to wait between each one before starting the next one. This is determined via experimentation.
It would be nice if applications could send out a signal when they have fully initialized but I don’t think such a construct exists in Windows applications, so you are left to guess time spreads.
@jojo
It is possible to find when an application in Windows as an end user you can access this through “run wait” in a batch file or at the command prompt. Similar API features are available to developers.
If starting things sequentially does make Windows boot more quickly it’s a shame they didn’t think to use it.
This functionality is implemented in WinPatrol, – nice addition to different “patrol” functions.
I use it with WinPatrol, and on my workplace to reduce startup load I use launcher to run many of needed applications.