<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filtering News By Keyword</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/29/filtering-news-by-keyword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/29/filtering-news-by-keyword/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:48:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top tech blogs - November &#124; Tech and life</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/29/filtering-news-by-keyword/#comment-555823</link>
		<dc:creator>Top tech blogs - November &#124; Tech and life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8596#comment-555823</guid>
		<description>[...] Filtering News By Keyword [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Filtering News By Keyword [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst has cool feed</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/29/filtering-news-by-keyword/#comment-552079</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst has cool feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8596#comment-552079</guid>
		<description>Filters work when nature of content remains constant. I think it&#039;s impossible to accurately construct set of filters that will not miss anything interesting and will cut off fluff at the same time.

Some filters like PostRank try to determine post popularity by social indicators but it&#039;s not a guarantee either.

I&#039;ll end up looking through all of my feeds anyway so I am not using filtering actively, I only have few filters set up to quickly spot important stuff like references to my blog. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filters work when nature of content remains constant. I think it&#8217;s impossible to accurately construct set of filters that will not miss anything interesting and will cut off fluff at the same time.</p>
<p>Some filters like PostRank try to determine post popularity by social indicators but it&#8217;s not a guarantee either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll end up looking through all of my feeds anyway so I am not using filtering actively, I only have few filters set up to quickly spot important stuff like references to my blog. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
