<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Annoying Aspects Of Tech Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:02:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DoneThat2</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-592991</link>
		<dc:creator>DoneThat2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-592991</guid>
		<description>Reflecting on blogs I like, there are a couple factors they share (or don&#039;t):

1.) The blogs&#039; post&#039;s headlines are informative and descriptive. This really helps me determine if the posting is one to invest time in reading. Also, when the post is bookmarked in the browser, a good headline becomes the bookmark title and proves invaluable when reviewing old bookmarks.

2.) Blog&#039;s interface facilitates selection of past content. For example, if I missed all the blog&#039;s postings from July 2008, it is extremely helpful to be able to go straight to the first July posting and then click through the rest of the month&#039;s postings. 

3.) I prefer a truncated feed that has a good informative headline with the first sentence of the unique posting. (I wish all blogs offered full and truncated feeds.)

4.) If a tech blog starts posting/advertising about political or cultural issues, I quit reading the blog. For example, if a tech blogger wants to wear their politics on their sleeve by posting pictures of their favorite candidate(s), it is buh-bye time.

5.) Tech blogs that cater to the &quot;top 10&quot; lists lose my loyalty and interest over time. I quit visiting Digg back in 2007 because of this sole reason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reflecting on blogs I like, there are a couple factors they share (or don&#8217;t):</p>
<p>1.) The blogs&#8217; post&#8217;s headlines are informative and descriptive. This really helps me determine if the posting is one to invest time in reading. Also, when the post is bookmarked in the browser, a good headline becomes the bookmark title and proves invaluable when reviewing old bookmarks.</p>
<p>2.) Blog&#8217;s interface facilitates selection of past content. For example, if I missed all the blog&#8217;s postings from July 2008, it is extremely helpful to be able to go straight to the first July posting and then click through the rest of the month&#8217;s postings. </p>
<p>3.) I prefer a truncated feed that has a good informative headline with the first sentence of the unique posting. (I wish all blogs offered full and truncated feeds.)</p>
<p>4.) If a tech blog starts posting/advertising about political or cultural issues, I quit reading the blog. For example, if a tech blogger wants to wear their politics on their sleeve by posting pictures of their favorite candidate(s), it is buh-bye time.</p>
<p>5.) Tech blogs that cater to the &#8220;top 10&#8243; lists lose my loyalty and interest over time. I quit visiting Digg back in 2007 because of this sole reason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-558227</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-558227</guid>
		<description>hey i am also a tech blog owner, but i don&#039;t write posts for digg and for any other social network websites because they send only useless traffic. writting posts like top 10 are totally useless they are reapeted a number of time.
most of the tech blogs won&#039;t link to the orignal source of information i wonder why [ReadersZone links to orignal source]
this blog post is really good and i have go some real good point from this blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey i am also a tech blog owner, but i don&#8217;t write posts for digg and for any other social network websites because they send only useless traffic. writting posts like top 10 are totally useless they are reapeted a number of time.<br />
most of the tech blogs won&#8217;t link to the orignal source of information i wonder why [ReadersZone links to orignal source]<br />
this blog post is really good and i have go some real good point from this blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Din nou despre bloguri &#171; Social media, Web 2.0, daily digital life stuffs</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-552370</link>
		<dc:creator>Din nou despre bloguri &#171; Social media, Web 2.0, daily digital life stuffs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-552370</guid>
		<description>[...] De asemenea, fiecare blogger ar fi bine sa urmareasca si recomandari cu &#8220;ce sa nu faca&#8221;. O astfel de lista poate fi accesata si aici! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] De asemenea, fiecare blogger ar fi bine sa urmareasca si recomandari cu &#8220;ce sa nu faca&#8221;. O astfel de lista poate fi accesata si aici! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best of What&#8217;s Around, #7 - The 2.0 Life</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-552128</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best of What&#8217;s Around, #7 - The 2.0 Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-552128</guid>
		<description>[...] gHacks- &#8220;10 Annoying Aspects of Tech Blogs&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gHacks- &#8220;10 Annoying Aspects of Tech Blogs&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dsouza</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551610</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dsouza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551610</guid>
		<description>As with not linking to the original sources, I have seen some people of my completely ripping off ideas and writing it on their own blog, though these may not be actual products one reviews, it definitely is really very frustrating to see someone you know do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with not linking to the original sources, I have seen some people of my completely ripping off ideas and writing it on their own blog, though these may not be actual products one reviews, it definitely is really very frustrating to see someone you know do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pallab</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551607</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551607</guid>
		<description>Truncated feeds is one thing that I really really hate. Why bother providing a feed at all..if the reader is gonna have to visit ur website to read stuff anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truncated feeds is one thing that I really really hate. Why bother providing a feed at all..if the reader is gonna have to visit ur website to read stuff anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Basics of Blogging &#124; blogstuffnow.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551458</link>
		<dc:creator>The Basics of Blogging &#124; blogstuffnow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551458</guid>
		<description>[...] 10 Annoying Aspects Of Tech Blogs       Blogging Basics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10 Annoying Aspects Of Tech Blogs       Blogging Basics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavan Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551385</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavan Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551385</guid>
		<description>Really good one....

And don&#039;t think I am going to digg it, I will stumble ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good one&#8230;.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t think I am going to digg it, I will stumble ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst has cool feed</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst has cool feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551184</guid>
		<description>@Klemen

Humour and opinion are different things. Humour is often trying to make post funny for the sake of success with social traffic. 

Opinion is adding own experience to the story like comparing to similar stuff or sharing usage history.

There can be both but you won&#039;t find good blogs that repeatedly stick to mindless sarcasm.

And sticking to pure tech is simply boring, it&#039;s not what blogs are. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Klemen</p>
<p>Humour and opinion are different things. Humour is often trying to make post funny for the sake of success with social traffic. </p>
<p>Opinion is adding own experience to the story like comparing to similar stuff or sharing usage history.</p>
<p>There can be both but you won&#8217;t find good blogs that repeatedly stick to mindless sarcasm.</p>
<p>And sticking to pure tech is simply boring, it&#8217;s not what blogs are. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Annoying Aspects Of Tech Blogs &#124; All Excerpts</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551166</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Annoying Aspects Of Tech Blogs &#124; All Excerpts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551166</guid>
		<description>[...] Good old Rarst posted another interesting article today about 10 things that make tech blogs unreadable. He has become quite the little ranter over at his Rarst stronghold but I have to admit that he has a point. His post got me thinking about aspects of tech blogs that I dislike and I came up [...]  Read More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good old Rarst posted another interesting article today about 10 things that make tech blogs unreadable. He has become quite the little ranter over at his Rarst stronghold but I have to admit that he has a point. His post got me thinking about aspects of tech blogs that I dislike and I came up [...]  Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551110</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 02:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551110</guid>
		<description>Digg users have no taste. They love cheap top-10 lists that mainly revolves around Firefox extensions, iPhone apps, and freeware alternative to commercial application. 

And there are Digg army, for sites like Lifehacker, Gizmodo, Techcrunch, LinuxHaxor that keeps digging low quality articles. I won&#039;t find anything new on Digg. That&#039;s why I kept returning to gHacks and Download Squad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg users have no taste. They love cheap top-10 lists that mainly revolves around Firefox extensions, iPhone apps, and freeware alternative to commercial application. </p>
<p>And there are Digg army, for sites like Lifehacker, Gizmodo, Techcrunch, LinuxHaxor that keeps digging low quality articles. I won&#8217;t find anything new on Digg. That&#8217;s why I kept returning to gHacks and Download Squad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-551014</link>
		<dc:creator>Klemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-551014</guid>
		<description>Heh, my first comment here... I just love the &quot;top 10&quot; irony in your post =)
I&#039;d like to add a little something to no. 3, adding opinion to the post. I read quite a few tech blogs and many of them like to add this opinion to the article. The problem is they are trying to use a sort of sarcastic humor, which seems to be funny only to the author of the post at that particular time. Consequentially, when commenters mention this to the author, he tries to be even &quot;funnier&quot; in the follow-up post, and fails miserably, of course. &quot;Sarcasm deluxe&quot; only makes him look like a fool. So in such cases, where the lack of sound judgment is obvious, it is probably best just stick to the tech part, and leave the opinion for the commenters.
I hope this was understandable, I do not blog in English. Yet =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, my first comment here&#8230; I just love the &#8220;top 10&#8243; irony in your post =)<br />
I&#8217;d like to add a little something to no. 3, adding opinion to the post. I read quite a few tech blogs and many of them like to add this opinion to the article. The problem is they are trying to use a sort of sarcastic humor, which seems to be funny only to the author of the post at that particular time. Consequentially, when commenters mention this to the author, he tries to be even &#8220;funnier&#8221; in the follow-up post, and fails miserably, of course. &#8220;Sarcasm deluxe&#8221; only makes him look like a fool. So in such cases, where the lack of sound judgment is obvious, it is probably best just stick to the tech part, and leave the opinion for the commenters.<br />
I hope this was understandable, I do not blog in English. Yet =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: my-t-man</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550923</link>
		<dc:creator>my-t-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550923</guid>
		<description>Hi Martin, Your blog is number one on my list and many other blogs link back to yours as source so you must be doing a good job. As for blogs that complain about others and do not really add anything worthwhile, well they are what they are, not worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin, Your blog is number one on my list and many other blogs link back to yours as source so you must be doing a good job. As for blogs that complain about others and do not really add anything worthwhile, well they are what they are, not worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst has cool feed</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550915</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst has cool feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550915</guid>
		<description>@Daniel

Sounds like a nice theme for a blog. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel</p>
<p>Sounds like a nice theme for a blog. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550903</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550903</guid>
		<description>The first thing which will make me run away from a site is the problem covered by No 4.
I just cannot stand a site that doesn&#039;t bother providing a link to the develloper&#039;s site. I&#039;d go a wee step further &amp; say that I dislike blogs that contain articles that do not contain the develloper&#039;s link in the summary &amp; force one to hit &#039;read more&#039;. I find it annoying &amp; off-putting. A site that contains the link in the summary will cause me to actually hit &#039;read more&#039; as obviously the blog owner doesn&#039;t need to create false boosting to get their articles read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing which will make me run away from a site is the problem covered by No 4.<br />
I just cannot stand a site that doesn&#8217;t bother providing a link to the develloper&#8217;s site. I&#8217;d go a wee step further &amp; say that I dislike blogs that contain articles that do not contain the develloper&#8217;s link in the summary &amp; force one to hit &#8216;read more&#8217;. I find it annoying &amp; off-putting. A site that contains the link in the summary will cause me to actually hit &#8216;read more&#8217; as obviously the blog owner doesn&#8217;t need to create false boosting to get their articles read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550894</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550894</guid>
		<description>I love hate stuff so much :D I mean not the bad kind, but stuff like this. i swear I&#039;ll start a blog on dark rantings I can be so cynical at times, perhaps people will be interested :) Rarst, Martin, anyone want to join? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love hate stuff so much :D I mean not the bad kind, but stuff like this. i swear I&#8217;ll start a blog on dark rantings I can be so cynical at times, perhaps people will be interested :) Rarst, Martin, anyone want to join? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst has cool feed</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550885</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst has cool feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550885</guid>
		<description>@Martin

Lots of stuff that doesn&#039;t somehow ranks high... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martin</p>
<p>Lots of stuff that doesn&#8217;t somehow ranks high&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550881</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550881</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because I do not get links in for the term Rarst ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because I do not get links in for the term Rarst ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst has cool feed</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550870</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst has cool feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550870</guid>
		<description>&gt;btw I’m position one on Google for Rarst Stronghold, hrhr

Hardly competitive keyword. :) It&#039;s strange you are not ranking for Rarst very high with your generous and abundant mentions.

You made top5 traffic sources in my 3-months milestone, I wonder how it will be on 6-months mark in January. Samer of Freeware Genius may beat your surges again with more steady blogroll link. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;btw I’m position one on Google for Rarst Stronghold, hrhr</p>
<p>Hardly competitive keyword. :) It&#8217;s strange you are not ranking for Rarst very high with your generous and abundant mentions.</p>
<p>You made top5 traffic sources in my 3-months milestone, I wonder how it will be on 6-months mark in January. Samer of Freeware Genius may beat your surges again with more steady blogroll link. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XxDeepxX</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/27/10-annoying-aspects-of-tech-blogs/#comment-550864</link>
		<dc:creator>XxDeepxX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8578#comment-550864</guid>
		<description>Yeah u got a point but the most annoying thing is that theres only 1 source but around other 10 websites publish the same article, and dont even talk about digg, it sucks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah u got a point but the most annoying thing is that theres only 1 source but around other 10 websites publish the same article, and dont even talk about digg, it sucks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
