<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Photo Filter Software</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/07/photo-filter-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/07/photo-filter-software/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: ?????????</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/07/photo-filter-software/comment-page-1/#comment-553751</link> <dc:creator>?????????</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8118#comment-553751</guid> <description>donde mierda lo vajo!!!!!!!!?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>donde mierda lo vajo!!!!!!!!?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Q</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/07/photo-filter-software/comment-page-1/#comment-531508</link> <dc:creator>Q</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:59:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8118#comment-531508</guid> <description>Great application.  Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
One negative thing about it I found so far is that the application does not save images as a JPEG such that source appears accurately represented (an example would be dark blue text of one pixel line thickness saves as black text with one pixel line thickness with a blue glow affect).  Other formats seem to save satisfactory.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great application.  Thanks for bringing it to my attention.</p><p>One negative thing about it I found so far is that the application does not save images as a JPEG such that source appears accurately represented (an example would be dark blue text of one pixel line thickness saves as black text with one pixel line thickness with a blue glow affect).  Other formats seem to save satisfactory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: garbanzo</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/07/photo-filter-software/comment-page-1/#comment-531447</link> <dc:creator>garbanzo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:37:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8118#comment-531447</guid> <description>regarding your last comment, Martin - i do own an older version of Photoshop, and while it&#039;s far superior to Photofiltre in many ways, i still use this app quite often. why? it&#039;s FAST. it starts up in no time, and it&#039;s much better for a quick crop or resize or some other little thing. i still use Photoshop for extensive edits, but enjoy Photofiltre for quick jobs.
oh, and it&#039;s portable too :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regarding your last comment, Martin &#8211; i do own an older version of Photoshop, and while it&#8217;s far superior to Photofiltre in many ways, i still use this app quite often. why? it&#8217;s FAST. it starts up in no time, and it&#8217;s much better for a quick crop or resize or some other little thing. i still use Photoshop for extensive edits, but enjoy Photofiltre for quick jobs.</p><p>oh, and it&#8217;s portable too :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
