<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Test Your Browser&#8217;s JavaScript Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SlimDan22</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comment-514571</link>
		<dc:creator>SlimDan22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701#comment-514571</guid>
		<description>I got about the same results as Stoinov &amp; i was using the portable version of firefox 3.1

XP SP3, Pentium D 3.4 Ghz, 2GB Ram</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got about the same results as Stoinov &amp; i was using the portable version of firefox 3.1</p>
<p>XP SP3, Pentium D 3.4 Ghz, 2GB Ram</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoinov</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comment-514536</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoinov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701#comment-514536</guid>
		<description>FF w/ TraceMonkey - 1310.0ms
FF w/o TraceMonkey - 2381.2ms
IE7 - 25340.6ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FF w/ TraceMonkey &#8211; 1310.0ms<br />
FF w/o TraceMonkey &#8211; 2381.2ms<br />
IE7 &#8211; 25340.6ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkat</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comment-514170</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701#comment-514170</guid>
		<description>What about Java script performance of Internet Explorer is it rated last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Java script performance of Internet Explorer is it rated last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technichristian.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Test Your Browser’s JavaScript Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comment-514105</link>
		<dc:creator>technichristian.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Test Your Browser’s JavaScript Performance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 05:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701#comment-514105</guid>
		<description>[...] Read on for the results. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read on for the results. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adminimize &#187; Check your browser&#8217;s javascript performance online</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comment-513942</link>
		<dc:creator>Adminimize &#187; Check your browser&#8217;s javascript performance online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701#comment-513942</guid>
		<description>[...] at gHacks has posted his thoughts on CNet&#8217;s recent browser performance comparison, as well as his own results with Firefox and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at gHacks has posted his thoughts on CNet&#8217;s recent browser performance comparison, as well as his own results with Firefox and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
