<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: One Password Management Software To Rule Them All</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: seenu</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1316683</link> <dc:creator>seenu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:00:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-1316683</guid> <description>The ads in the content are really distracting. Please show very less numbers of content ads. It increases readability.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ads in the content are really distracting. Please show very less numbers of content ads. It increases readability.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-995520</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-995520</guid> <description>g1lQzG061IUQ4EZ6FsIHl5uCCLk2L9ARJG7eXPsP1Nv1
is a 256-bit password, as shown by the RoboForm password generator, because there are 44 characters, using upper &amp; lower case and numeric characters, no special characters and the minimum number of numeric digits is 2. &quot;Exclude similar characters&quot; is unchecked, as is &quot;Hexadecimal 0-9, A-F&quot;.
It would have been 128-bit, if there were 22 characters with only 1 numeric digit required, from the same sets of characters.
At least, now you know that LastPass 256-bit encrypted data is protected by a weaker password than the encryption itself, unless the password is at least 44 characters, with no more than 2 numerals required, using A-Z, a-z and 0-9.
However, it&#039;s never a good idea to use exactly the minimum required. If a hacker knows exactly how many characters there are in a password, it becomes a much less difficult problem to decipher.
So, why not 50 or 60? The fewer numeric digits required, the better. If LastPass doesn&#039;t require any, then 50 characters = 297-bits and 60 = 357-bits, and the generated password may or may not include numerals.
357-bits would provide 29,356,782,284,672,915,348,618,507,459,867e+96 possible combinations. More than the NSA is likely to decipher in your lifetime.
So, get a Yubikey, if you want to keep your data kept safe online, assuming you trust LastPass encryption more than &quot;mark&quot; does. I believe a Yubikey can handle a password that long, but I haven&#039;t tried one yet.
However, if you don&#039;t trust proprietary code, which (by definition) provides security by obscurity, then you&#039;re better off with PasswordSafe, which is Free and Open Source, so it has been scrutinized much more than RoboForm or LastPass for properly implemented algorithms.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>g1lQzG061IUQ4EZ6FsIHl5uCCLk2L9ARJG7eXPsP1Nv1</p><p>is a 256-bit password, as shown by the RoboForm password generator, because there are 44 characters, using upper &amp; lower case and numeric characters, no special characters and the minimum number of numeric digits is 2. &#8220;Exclude similar characters&#8221; is unchecked, as is &#8220;Hexadecimal 0-9, A-F&#8221;.</p><p>It would have been 128-bit, if there were 22 characters with only 1 numeric digit required, from the same sets of characters.</p><p>At least, now you know that LastPass 256-bit encrypted data is protected by a weaker password than the encryption itself, unless the password is at least 44 characters, with no more than 2 numerals required, using A-Z, a-z and 0-9.</p><p>However, it&#8217;s never a good idea to use exactly the minimum required. If a hacker knows exactly how many characters there are in a password, it becomes a much less difficult problem to decipher.</p><p>So, why not 50 or 60? The fewer numeric digits required, the better. If LastPass doesn&#8217;t require any, then 50 characters = 297-bits and 60 = 357-bits, and the generated password may or may not include numerals.</p><p>357-bits would provide 29,356,782,284,672,915,348,618,507,459,867e+96 possible combinations. More than the NSA is likely to decipher in your lifetime.</p><p>So, get a Yubikey, if you want to keep your data kept safe online, assuming you trust LastPass encryption more than &#8220;mark&#8221; does. I believe a Yubikey can handle a password that long, but I haven&#8217;t tried one yet.</p><p>However, if you don&#8217;t trust proprietary code, which (by definition) provides security by obscurity, then you&#8217;re better off with PasswordSafe, which is Free and Open Source, so it has been scrutinized much more than RoboForm or LastPass for properly implemented algorithms.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-995506</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-995506</guid> <description>Why doesn&#039;t the password generator show the bit-strength of the password generated, so the user can see the effects of various options being taken?
The RoboForm password generator does this quite nicely.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t the password generator show the bit-strength of the password generated, so the user can see the effects of various options being taken?</p><p>The RoboForm password generator does this quite nicely.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mark</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-709659</link> <dc:creator>mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-709659</guid> <description>Joe (the LastPass guy) said:
&quot;Why wouldn’t you trust your encrypted data to be stored on a server?&quot;
Because there could be implementation bugs in your software, for one thing.  It&#039;s not impossible that you sometimes mistakenly send unencrypted passwords to your server under certain circumstances.  It&#039;s not impossible that the encryption is done, but not done in the best way, and has weaknesses that should not exist.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe (the LastPass guy) said:</p><p>&#8220;Why wouldn’t you trust your encrypted data to be stored on a server?&#8221;</p><p>Because there could be implementation bugs in your software, for one thing.  It&#8217;s not impossible that you sometimes mistakenly send unencrypted passwords to your server under certain circumstances.  It&#8217;s not impossible that the encryption is done, but not done in the best way, and has weaknesses that should not exist.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LastPass Now Compatible With All Browsers &#171; Shinko168&#8217;s Weblog</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-615045</link> <dc:creator>LastPass Now Compatible With All Browsers &#171; Shinko168&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:10:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-615045</guid> <description>[...] manager and form filler back in September and came to the conclusion that it was one of the best password management software programs out there. To be more precise, LastPass is an excellent unobtrusive password manager for [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manager and form filler back in September and came to the conclusion that it was one of the best password management software programs out there. To be more precise, LastPass is an excellent unobtrusive password manager for [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LastPass Now Compatible With All Browsers</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-614780</link> <dc:creator>LastPass Now Compatible With All Browsers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:48:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-614780</guid> <description>[...] manager and form filler back in September and came to the conclusion that it was one of the best password management software programs out there. To be more precise, LastPass is an excellent unobtrusive password manager for [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manager and form filler back in September and came to the conclusion that it was one of the best password management software programs out there. To be more precise, LastPass is an excellent unobtrusive password manager for [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reimpostazione password di massa in Firefox &#124; Firefox Blog</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-558375</link> <dc:creator>Reimpostazione password di massa in Firefox &#124; Firefox Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-558375</guid> <description>[...] ricordare più nulla. Questi strumenti purtroppo non sono utilizzati da molti utenti di Internet. (Last Pass è [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ricordare più nulla. Questi strumenti purtroppo non sono utilizzati da molti utenti di Internet. (Last Pass è [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Firefox Mass Password Reset</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-549508</link> <dc:creator>Firefox Mass Password Reset</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:14:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-549508</guid> <description>[...] have to remember anything anymore. These tools are unfortunately not used by many Internet users. (Last Pass is one [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have to remember anything anymore. These tools are unfortunately not used by many Internet users. (Last Pass is one [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guy Soffer</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-517949</link> <dc:creator>Guy Soffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:09:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-517949</guid> <description>Really an amazing product. I use it on a daily basis...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really an amazing product. I use it on a daily basis&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Harley</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-505792</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Harley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:38:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-505792</guid> <description>Joe Siegrist-
Thanks for the clarification. I&#039;m now more inclined to take a look at your offering.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Siegrist-</p><p>Thanks for the clarification. I&#8217;m now more inclined to take a look at your offering.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roman ShaRP</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-499691</link> <dc:creator>Roman ShaRP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:20:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-499691</guid> <description>May be I&#039;ll check it later. Now I&#039;m satisfied with Keepass, and I like that it&#039;s OpenSource.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be I&#8217;ll check it later. Now I&#8217;m satisfied with Keepass, and I like that it&#8217;s OpenSource.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Siegrist</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-493304</link> <dc:creator>Joe Siegrist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:23:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-493304</guid> <description>Why wouldn&#039;t you trust your encrypted data to be stored on a server?
LastPass works by locally encrypting data with 256-bit AES, then storing that for you so you can use it elsewhere.  It&#039;s quite safe if you pick a good master password.
If you trust NIST:
Q: What is the chance that someone could use the &quot;DES Cracker&quot;-like hardware to crack an AES key?
A: In the late 1990s, specialized &quot;DES Cracker&quot; machines were built that could recover a DES key after a few hours. In other words, by trying possible key values, the hardware could determine which key was used to encrypt a message.
Assuming that one could build a machine that could recover a DES key in a second (i.e., try 2^55 keys per second), then it would take that machine approximately 149 thousand-billion (149 trillion) years to crack a 128-bit AES key. To put that into perspective, the universe is believed to be less than 20 billion years old.
-- NIST.gov AES Questions and Answers
LastPass uses a 256-bit AES key, so it would take many times longer than this.  The risk of compromise of your locally encrypted data is exceedingly low.
Using LastPass is by far safer than what most people do, which is use a few passwords for every site.  Many sites don&#039;t hash passwords and simply store them in plain text, many sites don&#039;t encrypt the channel for sending passwords.  These are the pratical attacks that hackers can use to compromise you.
Joe Siegrist
LastPass</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t you trust your encrypted data to be stored on a server?</p><p>LastPass works by locally encrypting data with 256-bit AES, then storing that for you so you can use it elsewhere.  It&#8217;s quite safe if you pick a good master password.</p><p>If you trust NIST:</p><p>Q: What is the chance that someone could use the &#8220;DES Cracker&#8221;-like hardware to crack an AES key?</p><p>A: In the late 1990s, specialized &#8220;DES Cracker&#8221; machines were built that could recover a DES key after a few hours. In other words, by trying possible key values, the hardware could determine which key was used to encrypt a message.</p><p>Assuming that one could build a machine that could recover a DES key in a second (i.e., try 2^55 keys per second), then it would take that machine approximately 149 thousand-billion (149 trillion) years to crack a 128-bit AES key. To put that into perspective, the universe is believed to be less than 20 billion years old.</p><p>&#8211; NIST.gov AES Questions and Answers</p><p>LastPass uses a 256-bit AES key, so it would take many times longer than this.  The risk of compromise of your locally encrypted data is exceedingly low.</p><p>Using LastPass is by far safer than what most people do, which is use a few passwords for every site.  Many sites don&#8217;t hash passwords and simply store them in plain text, many sites don&#8217;t encrypt the channel for sending passwords.  These are the pratical attacks that hackers can use to compromise you.</p><p>Joe Siegrist<br
/> LastPass</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Bradley</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-493129</link> <dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-493129</guid> <description>Yes, point taken. It was the cloud security aspect I wouldn&#039;t trust. Moreover, I&#039;d be loathe to have all my passwords in one box on my PC too in case it was stolen and cracked open.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, point taken. It was the cloud security aspect I wouldn&#8217;t trust. Moreover, I&#8217;d be loathe to have all my passwords in one box on my PC too in case it was stolen and cracked open.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MK</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-493103</link> <dc:creator>MK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:32:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-493103</guid> <description>@David Bradley: There is no perfect answer to everything. What a password storage system do is simplify the management of your passwords (obviously). It can generate complex passwords, and store them so you don&#039;t have to remember all those tiny caps/big caps/numbers in your head.
Sure, it can eventually be cracked. But I prefer a password storage system that writing it on sticky notes, any day.
I do agree on the compromise of online system. Though it sounds tempting (you can access your passwords everywhere, don&#039;t even have to bring a pen drive), I would never trust my security on cloud computing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Bradley: There is no perfect answer to everything. What a password storage system do is simplify the management of your passwords (obviously). It can generate complex passwords, and store them so you don&#8217;t have to remember all those tiny caps/big caps/numbers in your head.</p><p>Sure, it can eventually be cracked. But I prefer a password storage system that writing it on sticky notes, any day.</p><p>I do agree on the compromise of online system. Though it sounds tempting (you can access your passwords everywhere, don&#8217;t even have to bring a pen drive), I would never trust my security on cloud computing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Bradley</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-492998</link> <dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-492998</guid> <description>Theoretically, all password storage systems could be cracked, compromising all your sites. I&#039;d worry about relying on an online system of any sort no matter how clever or otherwise it seems to be. There is no perfect answer LastPass is just another compromise.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theoretically, all password storage systems could be cracked, compromising all your sites. I&#8217;d worry about relying on an online system of any sort no matter how clever or otherwise it seems to be. There is no perfect answer LastPass is just another compromise.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MK</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-492904</link> <dc:creator>MK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:31:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-492904</guid> <description>Just what I am looking for right now. I&#039;ve been using PassPack for long, and it works great. However PassPack is too simple, thus lacks many features such as password generator, or the ability to choose where you can save the file.
I&#039;ve tried KeePass, nah too complex. Currently using PasswordSafe and it is pretty good.
LastPass sounds promising, especially the integration with the web browser. I hope future builds will include Opera.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I am looking for right now. I&#8217;ve been using PassPack for long, and it works great. However PassPack is too simple, thus lacks many features such as password generator, or the ability to choose where you can save the file.</p><p>I&#8217;ve tried KeePass, nah too complex. Currently using PasswordSafe and it is pretty good.</p><p>LastPass sounds promising, especially the integration with the web browser. I hope future builds will include Opera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pavid</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-492700</link> <dc:creator>pavid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:04:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-492700</guid> <description>I love LastPass. It&#039;s so easy to use.  Unfortunately, I have encountered a small problem in that I am unable to access my on-line e-mail using the new version of Rogers Yahoo.  However, the classic version of Rogers Yahoo works just fine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love LastPass. It&#8217;s so easy to use.  Unfortunately, I have encountered a small problem in that I am unable to access my on-line e-mail using the new version of Rogers Yahoo.  However, the classic version of Rogers Yahoo works just fine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LastPass: administrador de contrase&#241;as para Windows, Linux, Mac &#124; arturogoga</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/29/one-password-management-software-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-492583</link> <dc:creator>LastPass: administrador de contrase&#241;as para Windows, Linux, Mac &#124; arturogoga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:25:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7297#comment-492583</guid> <description>[...] via ghacks [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via ghacks [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
