<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Automatically Prioritize The Active Application</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bruno</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/comment-page-1/#comment-481033</link> <dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7032#comment-481033</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t see that it&#039;s possible to set process&#039;s priority with Advanced Shortcuts Composer.
for me, it&#039;s usefull at work.
thx</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see that it&#8217;s possible to set process&#8217;s priority with Advanced Shortcuts Composer.<br
/> for me, it&#8217;s usefull at work.<br
/> thx</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Prioritize Windows Applications with Mz Cpu Accelerator</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/comment-page-1/#comment-480689</link> <dc:creator>Prioritize Windows Applications with Mz Cpu Accelerator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:14:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7032#comment-480689</guid> <description>[...] can also accomplish this goal. Once such application is Mz Cpu Accelerator, as described in &#8220;Automatically Prioritize The Active Application&#8221; by tech blog gHacks.net.          Post a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can also accomplish this goal. Once such application is Mz Cpu Accelerator, as described in &ldquo;Automatically Prioritize The Active Application&rdquo; by tech blog gHacks.net.          Post a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: xpgeek</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/comment-page-1/#comment-479842</link> <dc:creator>xpgeek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:15:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7032#comment-479842</guid> <description>Ditto to Process Lasso doing this better and more.
And I played with this few days ago just for the heck of it, has major bugs on Vista x64, barely usable at all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to Process Lasso doing this better and more.</p><p>And I played with this few days ago just for the heck of it, has major bugs on Vista x64, barely usable at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Womble</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/comment-page-1/#comment-479831</link> <dc:creator>Womble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:45:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7032#comment-479831</guid> <description>You have to love the irony of an app that is designed to speed up windows built on .net :D
Not that there&#039;s anything fundamentaly wrong with .net but speed of execution was never a priority here.
I also think apps like this are a little naive. It&#039;s not like we use 486 cpu&#039;s anymore so any gains are negligible and maybe detrimental in some cases. Windows priority management is pretty good as far as I can tell, leave it too it and get on with something worthwhile.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to love the irony of an app that is designed to speed up windows built on .net :D</p><p>Not that there&#8217;s anything fundamentaly wrong with .net but speed of execution was never a priority here.</p><p>I also think apps like this are a little naive. It&#8217;s not like we use 486 cpu&#8217;s anymore so any gains are negligible and maybe detrimental in some cases. Windows priority management is pretty good as far as I can tell, leave it too it and get on with something worthwhile.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rarst</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/comment-page-1/#comment-479709</link> <dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:45:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7032#comment-479709</guid> <description>Advice for gamers - stay away from apps that change process priorities. It confuses DirectX and can create bunch of seemingly unrelated problems such as keyboard lag.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advice for gamers &#8211; stay away from apps that change process priorities. It confuses DirectX and can create bunch of seemingly unrelated problems such as keyboard lag.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Transcontinental</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/16/automatically-prioritize-the-active-application/comment-page-1/#comment-479693</link> <dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:08:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7032#comment-479693</guid> <description>Process Lasso does this and much more, requires half less RAM.
I&#039;ve tried &#039;Mz Cpu Accelerator&#039;. Problems arise when active application -- powered to high or above normal cpu priority -- is in a context where it should free some cycles and not grab them : this scheme is handled by &#039;Process Lasso&quot;, not by &#039;Mz Cpu Accelerator&#039;. Not worth, try in a cpu solicitated context with less than a 2GHz core and you&#039;ll remove it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Process Lasso does this and much more, requires half less RAM.<br
/> I&#8217;ve tried &#8216;Mz Cpu Accelerator&#8217;. Problems arise when active application &#8212; powered to high or above normal cpu priority &#8212; is in a context where it should free some cycles and not grab them : this scheme is handled by &#8216;Process Lasso&#8221;, not by &#8216;Mz Cpu Accelerator&#8217;. Not worth, try in a cpu solicitated context with less than a 2GHz core and you&#8217;ll remove it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
