<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Programs Should I Run To Scan A Computer For Malicious Software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pietzki</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-480296</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-480296</guid>
		<description>oh, and I forgot to include spywareblaster in my list. But if you already use a good hosts file there is no need for it, so this one is probably more useful for inexperienced users..

@ neem, I used to use threatfire, but I found that my pc was protected well enough without it. True, it adds an extra layer of protection, but that little bit wasn't enough to justify the false positives and resource use imo...

Martin, any chance of an updated list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and I forgot to include spywareblaster in my list. But if you already use a good hosts file there is no need for it, so this one is probably more useful for inexperienced users..</p>
<p>@ neem, I used to use threatfire, but I found that my pc was protected well enough without it. True, it adds an extra layer of protection, but that little bit wasn&#8217;t enough to justify the false positives and resource use imo&#8230;</p>
<p>Martin, any chance of an updated list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Woodall</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479884</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Woodall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479884</guid>
		<description>Avast and AVG are pretty good as per alot of happy users.
Ad-Aware and SpyBot are pretty well liked too.
Im using BitDefender myself. I like it.
Never thought I'd settle for a all-in-one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avast and AVG are pretty good as per alot of happy users.<br />
Ad-Aware and SpyBot are pretty well liked too.<br />
Im using BitDefender myself. I like it.<br />
Never thought I&#8217;d settle for a all-in-one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starboykb</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479586</link>
		<dc:creator>Starboykb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479586</guid>
		<description>Combo Fix is recommended to fix some corrupted windows and removed trojons and Vundo like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combo Fix is recommended to fix some corrupted windows and removed trojons and Vundo like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479506</guid>
		<description>Suggest you review the programs and thread discussions here:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggest you review the programs and thread discussions here:<br />
<a href="http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neem</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479293</link>
		<dc:creator>neem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479293</guid>
		<description>I use AntiVir (the best of all the freeware AVs and probably better than most of the paid); SuperAntiSpyware, MalwareBytes, and AVG Anti-Spyware (yes you can still download it/update definitions.. check filehippo.com) for AS; ThreatFire to supplement my traditional AV (threatfire.com)..

Of course a router and safe browsing practices are the first line of defense..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use AntiVir (the best of all the freeware AVs and probably better than most of the paid); SuperAntiSpyware, MalwareBytes, and AVG Anti-Spyware (yes you can still download it/update definitions.. check filehippo.com) for AS; ThreatFire to supplement my traditional AV (threatfire.com)..</p>
<p>Of course a router and safe browsing practices are the first line of defense..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pietzki</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479270</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479270</guid>
		<description>Good work on including Avira antivir, it is definitely one of the best (if not THE best) AV's out there.

But if I were you I would remove spyware terminator at once. It was once listed as a rogue app on spywarewarrior. It was de-listed in 2006 http://www.spywarewarrior.com/de-listed.htm but that doesn't mean it's trustworthy. In my books any company that was once involved in distributing malware (like Crawler LLC, the makers of spyware terminator were) does not deserve to be trusted, EVER.

I'd replace it with malwarebytes anti-malware instead. It is a great app, and is updated frequently. The other day there was a problem with it, and within a few hours (!!!) the makers had fixed it and released an update. That really shows commitment. 

What about adding a category for preventive measures? I'd include McAfee siteadvisor (the only mcafee product I'd ever use) and keyscrambler. Another obvious one would be the firefox extension noscript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work on including Avira antivir, it is definitely one of the best (if not THE best) AV&#8217;s out there.</p>
<p>But if I were you I would remove spyware terminator at once. It was once listed as a rogue app on spywarewarrior. It was de-listed in 2006 <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/de-listed.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.spywarewarrior.com/de-listed.htm</a> but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s trustworthy. In my books any company that was once involved in distributing malware (like Crawler LLC, the makers of spyware terminator were) does not deserve to be trusted, EVER.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d replace it with malwarebytes anti-malware instead. It is a great app, and is updated frequently. The other day there was a problem with it, and within a few hours (!!!) the makers had fixed it and released an update. That really shows commitment. </p>
<p>What about adding a category for preventive measures? I&#8217;d include McAfee siteadvisor (the only mcafee product I&#8217;d ever use) and keyscrambler. Another obvious one would be the firefox extension noscript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479259</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479259</guid>
		<description>Great starter discussion on PC security!
 
To round it out a bit, take a look at Gizmo's extended reviews and comments:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great starter discussion on PC security!</p>
<p>To round it out a bit, take a look at Gizmo&#8217;s extended reviews and comments:<br />
<a href="http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479222</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479222</guid>
		<description>Recommended
-free kaspersky avptool
-superantispyware (free)
-avira personal free(&#38; avira rescue cd)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recommended<br />
-free kaspersky avptool<br />
-superantispyware (free)<br />
-avira personal free(&amp; avira rescue cd)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaxta</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479220</link>
		<dc:creator>zaxta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479220</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Ad-aware?

Kaspersky is a pretty cool shareware, but one of the things I don't like is it blocks those ads like adsense and tribalfusion by default.

"Anti-virus applications create probably the most controversy. There is so much choice of free and commercial applications that makes it nearly impossible to make a decision."

If so, why don't you create a guide on how to choose the best anti-virus? I'd love to know about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Ad-aware?</p>
<p>Kaspersky is a pretty cool shareware, but one of the things I don&#8217;t like is it blocks those ads like adsense and tribalfusion by default.</p>
<p>&#8220;Anti-virus applications create probably the most controversy. There is so much choice of free and commercial applications that makes it nearly impossible to make a decision.&#8221;</p>
<p>If so, why don&#8217;t you create a guide on how to choose the best anti-virus? I&#8217;d love to know about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rruben</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479217</link>
		<dc:creator>rruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479217</guid>
		<description>I have bought kaspersky and am pretty happy with it. It has saved me a couple times, but also malwarebytes will do a great job indeed with vundo and winantiviruspro which sneaked on my pc between the time I removed kaspersky and when I bought it again. But when I used kaspersky again I saw that malwarebytes had left some crap over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have bought kaspersky and am pretty happy with it. It has saved me a couple times, but also malwarebytes will do a great job indeed with vundo and winantiviruspro which sneaked on my pc between the time I removed kaspersky and when I bought it again. But when I used kaspersky again I saw that malwarebytes had left some crap over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479210</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479210</guid>
		<description>Ben Antivir is in the list;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Antivir is in the list;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -=Ben=-</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479206</link>
		<dc:creator>-=Ben=-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479206</guid>
		<description>I suggest AntiVir for an AntiVirus solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest AntiVir for an AntiVirus solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slapjimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/comment-page-1/#comment-479194</link>
		<dc:creator>slapjimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479194</guid>
		<description>malwarebytes is pretty good too - gets rids of vundo and winantiviruspro2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>malwarebytes is pretty good too - gets rids of vundo and winantiviruspro2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
