<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Programs Should I Run To Scan A Computer For Malicious Software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:41:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pietzki</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-480296</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-480296</guid>
		<description>oh, and I forgot to include spywareblaster in my list. But if you already use a good hosts file there is no need for it, so this one is probably more useful for inexperienced users..

@ neem, I used to use threatfire, but I found that my pc was protected well enough without it. True, it adds an extra layer of protection, but that little bit wasn&#039;t enough to justify the false positives and resource use imo...

Martin, any chance of an updated list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and I forgot to include spywareblaster in my list. But if you already use a good hosts file there is no need for it, so this one is probably more useful for inexperienced users..</p>
<p>@ neem, I used to use threatfire, but I found that my pc was protected well enough without it. True, it adds an extra layer of protection, but that little bit wasn&#8217;t enough to justify the false positives and resource use imo&#8230;</p>
<p>Martin, any chance of an updated list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Woodall</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479884</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Woodall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479884</guid>
		<description>Avast and AVG are pretty good as per alot of happy users.
Ad-Aware and SpyBot are pretty well liked too.
Im using BitDefender myself. I like it.
Never thought I&#039;d settle for a all-in-one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avast and AVG are pretty good as per alot of happy users.<br />
Ad-Aware and SpyBot are pretty well liked too.<br />
Im using BitDefender myself. I like it.<br />
Never thought I&#8217;d settle for a all-in-one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starboykb</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479586</link>
		<dc:creator>Starboykb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479586</guid>
		<description>Combo Fix is recommended to fix some corrupted windows and removed trojons and Vundo like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combo Fix is recommended to fix some corrupted windows and removed trojons and Vundo like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479506</guid>
		<description>Suggest you review the programs and thread discussions here:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggest you review the programs and thread discussions here:<br />
<a href="http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neem</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479293</link>
		<dc:creator>neem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479293</guid>
		<description>I use AntiVir (the best of all the freeware AVs and probably better than most of the paid); SuperAntiSpyware, MalwareBytes, and AVG Anti-Spyware (yes you can still download it/update definitions.. check filehippo.com) for AS; ThreatFire to supplement my traditional AV (threatfire.com)..

Of course a router and safe browsing practices are the first line of defense..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use AntiVir (the best of all the freeware AVs and probably better than most of the paid); SuperAntiSpyware, MalwareBytes, and AVG Anti-Spyware (yes you can still download it/update definitions.. check filehippo.com) for AS; ThreatFire to supplement my traditional AV (threatfire.com)..</p>
<p>Of course a router and safe browsing practices are the first line of defense..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pietzki</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479270</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479270</guid>
		<description>Good work on including Avira antivir, it is definitely one of the best (if not THE best) AV&#039;s out there.

But if I were you I would remove spyware terminator at once. It was once listed as a rogue app on spywarewarrior. It was de-listed in 2006 http://www.spywarewarrior.com/de-listed.htm but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s trustworthy. In my books any company that was once involved in distributing malware (like Crawler LLC, the makers of spyware terminator were) does not deserve to be trusted, EVER.

I&#039;d replace it with malwarebytes anti-malware instead. It is a great app, and is updated frequently. The other day there was a problem with it, and within a few hours (!!!) the makers had fixed it and released an update. That really shows commitment. 

What about adding a category for preventive measures? I&#039;d include McAfee siteadvisor (the only mcafee product I&#039;d ever use) and keyscrambler. Another obvious one would be the firefox extension noscript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work on including Avira antivir, it is definitely one of the best (if not THE best) AV&#8217;s out there.</p>
<p>But if I were you I would remove spyware terminator at once. It was once listed as a rogue app on spywarewarrior. It was de-listed in 2006 <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/de-listed.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.spywarewarrior.com/de-listed.htm</a> but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s trustworthy. In my books any company that was once involved in distributing malware (like Crawler LLC, the makers of spyware terminator were) does not deserve to be trusted, EVER.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d replace it with malwarebytes anti-malware instead. It is a great app, and is updated frequently. The other day there was a problem with it, and within a few hours (!!!) the makers had fixed it and released an update. That really shows commitment. </p>
<p>What about adding a category for preventive measures? I&#8217;d include McAfee siteadvisor (the only mcafee product I&#8217;d ever use) and keyscrambler. Another obvious one would be the firefox extension noscript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479259</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479259</guid>
		<description>Great starter discussion on PC security!
 
To round it out a bit, take a look at Gizmo&#039;s extended reviews and comments:
http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great starter discussion on PC security!</p>
<p>To round it out a bit, take a look at Gizmo&#8217;s extended reviews and comments:<br />
<a href="http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.techsupportalert.com/pc/security-tools.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479222</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479222</guid>
		<description>Recommended
-free kaspersky avptool
-superantispyware (free)
-avira personal free(&amp; avira rescue cd)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recommended<br />
-free kaspersky avptool<br />
-superantispyware (free)<br />
-avira personal free(&amp; avira rescue cd)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaxta</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479220</link>
		<dc:creator>zaxta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479220</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Ad-aware?

Kaspersky is a pretty cool shareware, but one of the things I don&#039;t like is it blocks those ads like adsense and tribalfusion by default.

&quot;Anti-virus applications create probably the most controversy. There is so much choice of free and commercial applications that makes it nearly impossible to make a decision.&quot;

If so, why don&#039;t you create a guide on how to choose the best anti-virus? I&#039;d love to know about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Ad-aware?</p>
<p>Kaspersky is a pretty cool shareware, but one of the things I don&#8217;t like is it blocks those ads like adsense and tribalfusion by default.</p>
<p>&#8220;Anti-virus applications create probably the most controversy. There is so much choice of free and commercial applications that makes it nearly impossible to make a decision.&#8221;</p>
<p>If so, why don&#8217;t you create a guide on how to choose the best anti-virus? I&#8217;d love to know about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rruben</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479217</link>
		<dc:creator>rruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479217</guid>
		<description>I have bought kaspersky and am pretty happy with it. It has saved me a couple times, but also malwarebytes will do a great job indeed with vundo and winantiviruspro which sneaked on my pc between the time I removed kaspersky and when I bought it again. But when I used kaspersky again I saw that malwarebytes had left some crap over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have bought kaspersky and am pretty happy with it. It has saved me a couple times, but also malwarebytes will do a great job indeed with vundo and winantiviruspro which sneaked on my pc between the time I removed kaspersky and when I bought it again. But when I used kaspersky again I saw that malwarebytes had left some crap over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479210</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479210</guid>
		<description>Ben Antivir is in the list;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Antivir is in the list;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -=Ben=-</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479206</link>
		<dc:creator>-=Ben=-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479206</guid>
		<description>I suggest AntiVir for an AntiVirus solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest AntiVir for an AntiVirus solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slapjimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/15/which-programs-should-i-run-to-scan-a-computer-for-malicious-software/#comment-479194</link>
		<dc:creator>slapjimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7012#comment-479194</guid>
		<description>malwarebytes is pretty good too - gets rids of vundo and winantiviruspro2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>malwarebytes is pretty good too &#8211; gets rids of vundo and winantiviruspro2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
