<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Rodeo Protects Firefox From JavaScript Malware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:50:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Core</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-479235</link>
		<dc:creator>Core</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-479235</guid>
		<description>I find having NoScript very useful. You don&#039;t need to have it on all the time, and you can add all the sites you go to do a list of sites to allow script on (Or just do it as you go to them) - it&#039;s really not that hard. However, as said, it can&#039;t filter what scripts can and can&#039;t do.

I use this in combination with AdBlock Plus and Greasemonkey to block any ad what what not that I want. Going to install this and see how it is though (Already got it in, just waiting for an FF restart), looks like it will be good though.

Transcontinental: Never had a problem with NoScript, AdBlock or Greasemonkey slowing my webpage loading down - just saying.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find having NoScript very useful. You don&#8217;t need to have it on all the time, and you can add all the sites you go to do a list of sites to allow script on (Or just do it as you go to them) &#8211; it&#8217;s really not that hard. However, as said, it can&#8217;t filter what scripts can and can&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>I use this in combination with AdBlock Plus and Greasemonkey to block any ad what what not that I want. Going to install this and see how it is though (Already got it in, just waiting for an FF restart), looks like it will be good though.</p>
<p>Transcontinental: Never had a problem with NoScript, AdBlock or Greasemonkey slowing my webpage loading down &#8211; just saying.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iterasi</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-477059</link>
		<dc:creator>Iterasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-477059</guid>
		<description>LocalRodeo was just upgraded to version 0.8.5.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LocalRodeo was just upgraded to version 0.8.5.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaka</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-477054</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-477054</guid>
		<description>Works well. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works well. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-476692</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-476692</guid>
		<description>OK Martin, that&#039;s what I thought as well. And, in fine, this is almost a philosophical approach, I think life is essentially conducted throughout filtering attitudes, somewhere between the gullibility of accepting all and the paranoia of refusing all ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Martin, that&#8217;s what I thought as well. And, in fine, this is almost a philosophical approach, I think life is essentially conducted throughout filtering attitudes, somewhere between the gullibility of accepting all and the paranoia of refusing all &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-476682</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-476682</guid>
		<description>Transcontintenal: Noscript either blocks or does not block scripts but there is no way to configure what scripts may or may not do as far as I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transcontintenal: Noscript either blocks or does not block scripts but there is no way to configure what scripts may or may not do as far as I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-476678</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-476678</guid>
		<description>Martin, NoScript can block scripts, but can it filter them as Local Rodeo ?

1- I&#039;ve just installed Local Rodeo, googled on the French Renaissance in order to call less obvious DNS requests (does that make any sense ?) and noticed no speed drawback

2- I really appreciate &quot;set and go&quot; security, not only because I&#039;m lazy or snob, but because I am not aware of technical issues.

I&#039;ll keep this Local Rodeo extension running and see how things evolve. I like to believe this is one more extra (and important as I&#039;ve read) security measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, NoScript can block scripts, but can it filter them as Local Rodeo ?</p>
<p>1- I&#8217;ve just installed Local Rodeo, googled on the French Renaissance in order to call less obvious DNS requests (does that make any sense ?) and noticed no speed drawback</p>
<p>2- I really appreciate &#8220;set and go&#8221; security, not only because I&#8217;m lazy or snob, but because I am not aware of technical issues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep this Local Rodeo extension running and see how things evolve. I like to believe this is one more extra (and important as I&#8217;ve read) security measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-476675</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-476675</guid>
		<description>Pietzki NoScript can block all scripts including Flash and Java. Basically everything that is loaded as a plugin into Firefox I assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pietzki NoScript can block all scripts including Flash and Java. Basically everything that is loaded as a plugin into Firefox I assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-476670</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-476670</guid>
		<description>Now this is most interesting, only drawback seems to be a possible noticeable slowdown. I&#039;m giving it a try, thanks for this most valuable info, Martin

@Pietzki, I have no idea of NoScript&#039;s range of features; I don&#039;t use it myself as it seems to me exaggeratedly tedious to analyze every website for a go or not : man, I want to surf in security and peace, but no more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is most interesting, only drawback seems to be a possible noticeable slowdown. I&#8217;m giving it a try, thanks for this most valuable info, Martin</p>
<p>@Pietzki, I have no idea of NoScript&#8217;s range of features; I don&#8217;t use it myself as it seems to me exaggeratedly tedious to analyze every website for a go or not : man, I want to surf in security and peace, but no more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pietzki</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/10/local-rodeo-protects-firefox-from-javascript-malware/#comment-476652</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietzki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6907#comment-476652</guid>
		<description>wouldn&#039;t noscript do the same though? Or does that not protect against java and flash content? (this is a serious question btw, I don&#039;t know much about scripts)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wouldn&#8217;t noscript do the same though? Or does that not protect against java and flash content? (this is a serious question btw, I don&#8217;t know much about scripts)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
