<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Anonymizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:21:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-852447</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-852447</guid>
		<description>After I ran Chrome Anonymizer I was not able to log into my gmail account. Now how do I undo Anonymizer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I ran Chrome Anonymizer I was not able to log into my gmail account. Now how do I undo Anonymizer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flink</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-805414</link>
		<dc:creator>flink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-805414</guid>
		<description>Would it not be better if everyone used the same Client ID?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it not be better if everyone used the same Client ID?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetson</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-597968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-597968</guid>
		<description>Although Google Chrome is very basic &amp; simple, but that’s I want. I am finding Firefox &amp; IE to be slower than before. It’s a great alternative.

JM Cove Online Community
http://JMcove.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Google Chrome is very basic &amp; simple, but that’s I want. I am finding Firefox &amp; IE to be slower than before. It’s a great alternative.</p>
<p>JM Cove Online Community<br />
<a href="http://JMcove.com" rel="nofollow">http://JMcove.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-479772</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-479772</guid>
		<description>We tested Chrome&#039;s quality of speed on our aplication (http://www.taskwriter.com) and it is faster than IE and a little bit faster than Firefox 3.0. See the graphics: http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tested Chrome&#8217;s quality of speed on our aplication (<a href="http://www.taskwriter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com</a>) and it is faster than IE and a little bit faster than Firefox 3.0. See the graphics: <a href="http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-477958</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-477958</guid>
		<description>@Bill, OK and thanks for confirming. Then it will work on a French system as well. I&#039;ll pass the good news.

I think Google is going to have quite a lot of “client_id”: “0″. But I&#039;ve read that this infamous ClientID was more a second-level reference, level 1 being IP. ClientID would be there only to distinguish users of a same computer ...

I&#039;m not really concerned myself since I haven&#039;t installed Chrome, but I know several relatives who have, so I try to understand to help them if I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill, OK and thanks for confirming. Then it will work on a French system as well. I&#8217;ll pass the good news.</p>
<p>I think Google is going to have quite a lot of “client_id”: “0″. But I&#8217;ve read that this infamous ClientID was more a second-level reference, level 1 being IP. ClientID would be there only to distinguish users of a same computer &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really concerned myself since I haven&#8217;t installed Chrome, but I know several relatives who have, so I try to understand to help them if I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-477948</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-477948</guid>
		<description>Transcontinental, 
UnChrome worked on my xppro system. After using it, my Local State file reads,

   &quot;user_experience_metrics&quot;: {
      &quot;client_id&quot;: &quot;0&quot;,
      &quot;client_id_timestamp&quot;: &quot;0&quot;

I dl&#039;ed UnChrome from the English language page, and the GUI is written in English.

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transcontinental,<br />
UnChrome worked on my xppro system. After using it, my Local State file reads,</p>
<p>   &#8220;user_experience_metrics&#8221;: {<br />
      &#8220;client_id&#8221;: &#8220;0&#8243;,<br />
      &#8220;client_id_timestamp&#8221;: &#8220;0&#8243;</p>
<p>I dl&#8217;ed UnChrome from the English language page, and the GUI is written in English.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-477932</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-477932</guid>
		<description>@Bill, I&#039;ve read that on a french forum, but it was mentioned that this program written in German considered system paths in German, making the program maybe unsuccessful in other languages. Can you confirm this? Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill, I&#8217;ve read that on a french forum, but it was mentioned that this program written in German considered system paths in German, making the program maybe unsuccessful in other languages. Can you confirm this? Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-477856</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-477856</guid>
		<description>Update: Sept 12, 08

Recently released UNCHROME also removes the client id.

http://www.abelssoft.de/
http://www.abelssoft.net/unchrome.php (English)

From the website:
&quot;Unfortunately, each Google Chrome installation contains a unique ID that allowing identifying its user. Google doesn&#039;t make it an easy job to remove this ID.

UnChrome helps you with this task. It replaces your unique ID with Null values so that your browser cannot be identified any longer. The functionality of Google Chrome is not influenced by this. You only need to apply UnChrome once.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Sept 12, 08</p>
<p>Recently released UNCHROME also removes the client id.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abelssoft.de/" rel="nofollow">http://www.abelssoft.de/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.abelssoft.net/unchrome.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.abelssoft.net/unchrome.php</a> (English)</p>
<p>From the website:<br />
&#8220;Unfortunately, each Google Chrome installation contains a unique ID that allowing identifying its user. Google doesn&#8217;t make it an easy job to remove this ID.</p>
<p>UnChrome helps you with this task. It replaces your unique ID with Null values so that your browser cannot be identified any longer. The functionality of Google Chrome is not influenced by this. You only need to apply UnChrome once.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Anonymize Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-476702</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Anonymize Google Chrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-476702</guid>
		<description>[...] the Google Chrome browser&#8217;s ability to phone home, tech site gHacks.net has published some tips for anonymizing Google Chrome. The article presents three different methods of removing the unique ID used to identify your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Google Chrome browser&#8217;s ability to phone home, tech site gHacks.net has published some tips for anonymizing Google Chrome. The article presents three different methods of removing the unique ID used to identify your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-476613</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-476613</guid>
		<description>I used the same approach as Ash to remove the client id (manually edit, change Local State to read only, and do the same with the subsequent Local State.tmp file Google Chrome creates). My findings are consistent in that Google Chrome does not seem to be creating any further Local State files and is unable to edit the current two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the same approach as Ash to remove the client id (manually edit, change Local State to read only, and do the same with the subsequent Local State.tmp file Google Chrome creates). My findings are consistent in that Google Chrome does not seem to be creating any further Local State files and is unable to edit the current two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-476438</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-476438</guid>
		<description>Thank you Martin.  Your article was an eye opener to me and I&#039;ve since downloaded and installed the anonymiser.  Security adn protection is one thing but being snooped on doesn&#039;t feel right.

Best wishes,

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Martin.  Your article was an eye opener to me and I&#8217;ve since downloaded and installed the anonymiser.  Security adn protection is one thing but being snooped on doesn&#8217;t feel right.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-476402</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-476402</guid>
		<description>Richard it depends. Even if you log into other Google services and use Google Search they still cannot protocol your behavior on non-Google sites over sessions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard it depends. Even if you log into other Google services and use Google Search they still cannot protocol your behavior on non-Google sites over sessions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-476387</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-476387</guid>
		<description>Does logging into other Google services, such as Google Reader, then render the anonymisr pointless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does logging into other Google services, such as Google Reader, then render the anonymisr pointless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Security Podcast Episode 17 - Sep 09 2008 &#171; Data Security Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-474847</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Security Podcast Episode 17 - Sep 09 2008 &#171; Data Security Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-474847</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Chrome Anonymizers from ghacks. Tools to keep web surfing more private when using Google&#8217;s new Chrome web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Chrome Anonymizers from ghacks. Tools to keep web surfing more private when using Google&#8217;s new Chrome web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google naujienos: Chrome pagreitis : nežinau.lt</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-474756</link>
		<dc:creator>Google naujienos: Chrome pagreitis : nežinau.lt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-474756</guid>
		<description>[...] Pirmąsias Chrome problemas ir trūkumus vartotojai netruko išspręsti. Reklamos blokavimui galima panaudoti kokią nors vietinę „proxy“ versiją su filtrais; po Google paaiškinimo, apsiramino aistros dėl naršyklės licencijos teksto; atsirado būdų keisti Chrome išvaizdą (bent jau spalvas), anonimizuoti naršymą su ja. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pirmąsias Chrome problemas ir trūkumus vartotojai netruko išspręsti. Reklamos blokavimui galima panaudoti kokią nors vietinę „proxy“ versiją su filtrais; po Google paaiškinimo, apsiramino aistros dėl naršyklės licencijos teksto; atsirado būdų keisti Chrome išvaizdą (bent jau spalvas), anonimizuoti naršymą su ja. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-474638</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-474638</guid>
		<description>Thanks - &quot;Google Chrome Anonymizer&quot; works as described!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; &#8220;Google Chrome Anonymizer&#8221; works as described!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links f&#252;r Google Chrome-Anwender &#124; Caschys Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-474516</link>
		<dc:creator>Links f&#252;r Google Chrome-Anwender &#124; Caschys Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-474516</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Chrome Anomyzer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Chrome Anomyzer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Remove Client Id From Chrome To Protect Your Privacy &#124; TECH YARD</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-474474</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Remove Client Id From Chrome To Protect Your Privacy &#124; TECH YARD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-474474</guid>
		<description>[...] Via GHacks   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via GHacks   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-473922</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-473922</guid>
		<description>On the 3rd method.
You can edit the file, then make it read only.
Run and close chrome again.
Chrome will create a &quot;Local State.tmp&quot; file.
Edit that file also, and make it read only.

Chrome shouldn&#039;t make any more back ups... I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 3rd method.<br />
You can edit the file, then make it read only.<br />
Run and close chrome again.<br />
Chrome will create a &#8220;Local State.tmp&#8221; file.<br />
Edit that file also, and make it read only.</p>
<p>Chrome shouldn&#8217;t make any more back ups&#8230; I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/07/google-chrome-anonymizer/#comment-473898</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6845#comment-473898</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather say Big Uncle than Big Brother, Google is not NSA, it&#039;s only business, smart business. Everyone knows what Google is up to, but the company communicates so well and its products are so fine that either some will disclose their privacy or others try to beat the company on its ground.

Nice summary, Martin, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather say Big Uncle than Big Brother, Google is not NSA, it&#8217;s only business, smart business. Everyone knows what Google is up to, but the company communicates so well and its products are so fine that either some will disclose their privacy or others try to beat the company on its ground.</p>
<p>Nice summary, Martin, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
