<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Security Vulnerability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:02:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: San Diego Web Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-866880</link>
		<dc:creator>San Diego Web Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-866880</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know of a downloadable patch for this? thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know of a downloadable patch for this? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voooz.com &#187; Google Chrome, Is it Secure enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-861577</link>
		<dc:creator>Voooz.com &#187; Google Chrome, Is it Secure enough?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-861577</guid>
		<description>[...] had actually read about a security threat in Chrome a few days back, which can be traced to its Webkit Engine. But I didn&#8217;t pay much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had actually read about a security threat in Chrome a few days back, which can be traced to its Webkit Engine. But I didn&#8217;t pay much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Chrome OS Security Claims: Idiotic?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-848930</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Chrome OS Security Claims: Idiotic?&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-848930</guid>
		<description>[...] the browser is indeed well-done from a security standpoint, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that Google hasn&#8217;t had to patch up holes. If Chrome-the-OS is as safe as the browser, it&#8217;ll be a point in its favor. But it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the browser is indeed well-done from a security standpoint, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that Google hasn&#8217;t had to patch up holes. If Chrome-the-OS is as safe as the browser, it&#8217;ll be a point in its favor. But it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadir</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-645838</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-645838</guid>
		<description>When was d last time dis page was updated.?? 
Has google still not fixd d prob?? probs rather..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When was d last time dis page was updated.??<br />
Has google still not fixd d prob?? probs rather..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big D</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-580326</link>
		<dc:creator>Big D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-580326</guid>
		<description>Hey everybody, i was wondering if there is a way of disabeling or cracking the A10 version of Bios of a dell computer from the guess account.  I tried this comand from Dos-promp 
-o 70 2e hit enter 
-o 71 ff hit enter 
-q hit enter 
and exit but dost seem to work from the guess account.
 Anybody has an Idea let me know ,
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody, i was wondering if there is a way of disabeling or cracking the A10 version of Bios of a dell computer from the guess account.  I tried this comand from Dos-promp<br />
-o 70 2e hit enter<br />
-o 71 ff hit enter<br />
-q hit enter<br />
and exit but dost seem to work from the guess account.<br />
 Anybody has an Idea let me know ,<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-556671</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-556671</guid>
		<description>Hello Dear,
very smart..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dear,<br />
very smart..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backgammon Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-502737</link>
		<dc:creator>Backgammon Basics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-502737</guid>
		<description>Chrome will be able to compete in more decent terms than Firefox was ever to do against IE.
Chrome rules, it is like Firefox, but with better minds behind. I hope FF disappears and every effort is set up to continue the good line of Chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome will be able to compete in more decent terms than Firefox was ever to do against IE.<br />
Chrome rules, it is like Firefox, but with better minds behind. I hope FF disappears and every effort is set up to continue the good line of Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 things to love (and hate) about Google Chrome &#171; 10 Dots</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-494649</link>
		<dc:creator>10 things to love (and hate) about Google Chrome &#171; 10 Dots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-494649</guid>
		<description>[...] ever be completely secure. One day after release of the first public beta, Chrome was found to have a security vulnerability that exploits Webkit and a Java bug. Shortly thereafter, a critical buffer overflow vulnerability was identified by a Vietnamese [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever be completely secure. One day after release of the first public beta, Chrome was found to have a security vulnerability that exploits Webkit and a Java bug. Shortly thereafter, a critical buffer overflow vulnerability was identified by a Vietnamese [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 things to love (and hate) about Google Chrome &#124; 10 Things &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-494513</link>
		<dc:creator>10 things to love (and hate) about Google Chrome &#124; 10 Things &#124; TechRepublic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-494513</guid>
		<description>[...] ever be completely secure. One day after release of the first public beta, Chrome was found to have a security vulnerability that exploits Webkit and a Java bug. Shortly thereafter, a critical buffer overflow vulnerability was identified by a Vietnamese [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever be completely secure. One day after release of the first public beta, Chrome was found to have a security vulnerability that exploits Webkit and a Java bug. Shortly thereafter, a critical buffer overflow vulnerability was identified by a Vietnamese [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome a Security Risk?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-491599</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome a Security Risk?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-491599</guid>
		<description>[...] had actually read about a security threat in Chrome a few days back, which can be traced to its Webkit Engine. But I didn&#8217;t pay much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had actually read about a security threat in Chrome a few days back, which can be traced to its Webkit Engine. But I didn&#8217;t pay much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chennai Accomodations</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-489323</link>
		<dc:creator>chennai Accomodations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-489323</guid>
		<description>one more feature is Chrome gets fixes silently downloads and installs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one more feature is Chrome gets fixes silently downloads and installs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: film fan</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-479912</link>
		<dc:creator>film fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-479912</guid>
		<description>there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it&#039;s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it&#039;s quirky cookie management...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it&#8217;s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it&#8217;s quirky cookie management&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WizzKid (Neil)</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-476403</link>
		<dc:creator>WizzKid (Neil)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-476403</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pets lover</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-473150</link>
		<dc:creator>Pets lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-473150</guid>
		<description>it looks simple &amp; faster than other browser but sad to know about the Vulnerabilities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks simple &amp; faster than other browser but sad to know about the Vulnerabilities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogvaria &#187; What do you think about Google Chrome?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-471956</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogvaria &#187; What do you think about Google Chrome?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-471956</guid>
		<description>[...] There seams to be at least one good reason NOT to start using Chrome&#8230;    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There seams to be at least one good reason NOT to start using Chrome&#8230;    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome: Porque &#233; t&#227;o bom? &#171; Artur Carvalho</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-471914</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome: Porque &#233; t&#227;o bom? &#171; Artur Carvalho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-471914</guid>
		<description>[...] Já apareceu uma vulnerabilidade. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Já apareceu uma vulnerabilidade. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Mårtensson</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-471891</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Mårtensson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-471891</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or is the fact that Chrome works outside of &quot;Program Files&quot; a HUGE security flaw? (Check my link to my blog)

Cheers,

/Magnus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or is the fact that Chrome works outside of &#8220;Program Files&#8221; a HUGE security flaw? (Check my link to my blog)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>/Magnus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebNotes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chrome : le recueil des avis</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-471844</link>
		<dc:creator>WebNotes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chrome : le recueil des avis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-471844</guid>
		<description>[...] voir comment la communauté des développeurs va se comporter, comment Google va réagir face aux failles de sécurité, et comment le produit va évoluer pour devenir compatibles mutli-plateformes et comment Google va [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] voir comment la communauté des développeurs va se comporter, comment Google va réagir face aux failles de sécurité, et comment le produit va évoluer pour devenir compatibles mutli-plateformes et comment Google va [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google Chrome worth all the Hype? &#124; Best Rank Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-471446</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google Chrome worth all the Hype? &#124; Best Rank Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-471446</guid>
		<description>[...] Security Vulnerabilities - Only one day after being released a security vulnerability was found that combines a security flaw in Webkit, the browser engine used by Google Chrome, with a Java bug.  This is only one of the many bugs that have been found in the recent days. (source) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Security Vulnerabilities &#8211; Only one day after being released a security vulnerability was found that combines a security flaw in Webkit, the browser engine used by Google Chrome, with a Java bug.  This is only one of the many bugs that have been found in the recent days. (source) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fromrss &#187; Une faille dans Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/03/google-chrome-security-vulnerability/#comment-470951</link>
		<dc:creator>fromrss &#187; Une faille dans Google Chrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=6748#comment-470951</guid>
		<description>[...] : gHack.net   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : gHack.net   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
