Comments on: Chromatose

By: Drizzt

Drizzt — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:46:52 +0000

I feel that it really has added benefits when Google launch their web browser this week called Google Chrome.

An added benefit of it is the tight integration of Google Gears into it.This i would think will translate to better performance when working with some Web 2.0 application such as Gmail, Remember The Milk etc.

Specifically, Google Chrome enables you to launch a streamline web application such as Remember The Milk or Zoho Docs by itself.You can compare the vast differences in speed when you launch a Google Chrome instance vs a Mozilla Firefox 3 instance.

The problem is that for these application, you would require only one copy of it to run and reference it time and time again. What do i think is the best way to do this? Enter AutoHotKey.

Here i will go through an example of how i will use Chrome and AutoHotKey to bring up a list of To-Dos on Remember The Milk.

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:43:40 +0000

Also this should help those of you concerned about the EULA/TOS.

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:24:13 +0000

I agree that there's obviously a lot of features missing, but I've found it to be extremely fast and lightweight compared to IE and FF. And with this news (ignoring the commentary and guesses from the author) all those pretty extensions we all rely on so much will be added soon I think.

By: archer

archer — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:10:49 +0000

roman said it well.

also, the lack of full control of cookies is a major negative for me. accept or reject only. no option to decide per site.

a big positive is the ability to create standalones using the app shortcut feature.
i think that’s all i’ll be using it for at present.

By: David Bradley

David Bradley — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:04:08 +0000

The idea that Chrome will be a system for access Google apps is basically how I saw it, a kind of virtual OS, that will no doubt morph into a fully fledged OS at some point in the future, kind of like MS Windows in reverse

By: darkkosmos

darkkosmos — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:50:13 +0000

“killer features such as download management, which is seriously amazing and the Task Manager. Other benefits are the sleak design, performance and rapid javascript loading.”
What of it? My firefox skin + sefl made styles look good (better than chrome if I may say so), the rapid script loading doesn’t matter to me; my computer is fast enough and the task manager is a joke -.-.

btw did you know chrome is vulnerable to carpet bombing? and did you read the EULA?

By: Roman ShaRP

Roman ShaRP — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:28:12 +0000

I launched Chrome, opened my journal, saw freaking ads, looked where to block them, found nothing, closed Chrome and returned back to Firefox.

That’s all, folks.

By: foo

foo — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:43:28 +0000

” ” exactly.

By: iampriteshdesai

iampriteshdesai — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:28:47 +0000

With Google’s penchant for Betas (Gmail is still in Beta testing) I wonder how many decades it will take before Chrome finally goes live.

By: nob

nob — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:26:52 +0000

@garbanzo
look in the tools dialog for that

By: butty

butty — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:10:30 +0000

I’ve tried it but the experience with it was very disapointing. I expected the Gmail and other Google products to work better than in the other browsers and finding that they load slower that in FF3 it made think that I’ll have to wait a long time until I’ll use Chrome (Gmail loaded way faster in FF3 even with lousy “skins” added to it, and if the promised javascipt upgrade to FF3 will have its expected impact I don’t think I should wait for Chrome upgrades anytime soon).

Also it freezes for at least 5 seconds when it loads .flv in a page!

Has anyone else had problems with it? (Or am I the only unlucky one?)

By: garbanzo

garbanzo — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:52:15 +0000

just tried it. i was rather frustrated by the lack of a ‘home’ button!

at the moment, i am far too dependent on a handful of Firefox extensions to even consider switching browsers. it worked well enough, but so do all the other browsers i’ve tried.

as for the sandbox feature, i usually run Firefox in Sandboxie anyway. and if i feel like being stealthy, i’ll use OperaTor. between these, i have everything i need…

By: Jojo

Jojo — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:44:16 +0000

It will be some time before I try Chrome as I will wait for a more developed product. However, [at least] two things really impresses me about Chrome:

1. Google has isolated EACH tab into its own “sandbox”! This is a major security issue in tabbed browsers and I only hope that FF/IE, etc. will quickly follow and do the same.

As it stands now, if you allow something to run through your firewall in say Firefox, then it can run in any tab in the browser, not just the one tab that you allowed from. If you deny permission for something to run, then it applies to the whole browser and not just the the particular website in the tab that had focus. This is a potential large security hole.

I complained about this weakness in the past to Comodo, whose firewall software I use, but they never did anything about this problem (which is why I am still running Comodo 2.4 instead of 3.x). In fact, Comodo support didn’t even understand what I was talking about!

2. I also like the built-in “Incognito” mode in the Google browser. This is a good idea.