Credible Reporting eh?
I use Digg (on occasion), StumbleUpon and sometimes Google News. The New York Times and Techmeme satisfy the rest of my needs.
I didnâ€™t really think I could be interested in yet another crowd-powered news aggregating websiteâ€¦ Mixx, Reddit, Regator, Social Median,Â Soshable, Propeller, Sphinn evenâ€¦ whether theyâ€™re the next Digg I have no ideaâ€¦ but it sure isnâ€™t worth the time signing up in my opinion.
I was very interested in the announcement yesterday however, that a new service called â€˜NewsCredâ€™ was launching with the aim of gathering and aggregating articles based on their credibility over blind crowd popularity.
Itâ€™s a fantastic objective, one which anyone who has used Digg over the last few years would probably love to seeâ€¦ itâ€™s all too common where completely bogus stories are voted for so that they appear right on the front page (and sometimes consequently removed by the "invisible handâ€™ of non-existent editors').
Crowdâ€™s usually vote based on personal preference and opinion as wellâ€¦ a story about Microsoft may be brilliant, well-researched and accurateâ€¦ but is buried by Apple fans purely because they dislike Microsoft.
Whether or not NewsCred can get around this hurdle will be interesting to see, although it isnâ€™t the first to attempt this strategy; NewsTrust has been around for a few years (although I had never heard of it before) and has had slow but steady growth.
The most useful and interesting thing about NewsCred is the analytics optionâ€¦ you can examine the credibility of a publication based on how it fared on NewsCred. Just one indicator sureâ€¦ but with time it should really be a good measure of the reporting quality of various news sources.
You can also customize the NewsCred front page based on your interests and the publications you prefer. In many ways, even if the credibility factor doesnâ€™t worry you, itâ€™s still a good source of daily news much like Google News.Advertisement