<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-438894</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-438894</guid>
		<description>[...] of this post: gHacks technology news     No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of this post: gHacks technology news     No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garbanzo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-438177</link>
		<dc:creator>garbanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-438177</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know if my mind is just trained to the way google presents search results, but i tried one search in cuil and couldn&#039;t wrap my head around what it spat out at me. tiled search results? not a very efficient way to organize data. that was the end of that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know if my mind is just trained to the way google presents search results, but i tried one search in cuil and couldn&#8217;t wrap my head around what it spat out at me. tiled search results? not a very efficient way to organize data. that was the end of that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-437995</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-437995</guid>
		<description>lol in my language it sounds like &#039;testicules&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol in my language it sounds like &#8216;testicules&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRTerrero</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-437504</link>
		<dc:creator>GRTerrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-437504</guid>
		<description>This service has one huge drawback working against it...the name!

In a few European languages its name can quite easily be misinterpreted to mean &quot;arse&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This service has one huge drawback working against it&#8230;the name!</p>
<p>In a few European languages its name can quite easily be misinterpreted to mean &#8220;arse&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Cleave</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-437498</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Cleave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-437498</guid>
		<description>Your post gives some interesting extra information on Cuil. I tried some searches using my own (fairly unique) combination of first name and surname along with the ProReviewer site name and some of the posts. The results were disapointing 
(see  http://proreviewer.com/2008/07/30/cuil-search-engine-maybe-not-so-cool-yet/)

You have to admire some clever marketing of a the product.

Barry Cleave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post gives some interesting extra information on Cuil. I tried some searches using my own (fairly unique) combination of first name and surname along with the ProReviewer site name and some of the posts. The results were disapointing<br />
(see  <a href="http://proreviewer.com/2008/07/30/cuil-search-engine-maybe-not-so-cool-yet/)" rel="nofollow">http://proreviewer.com/2008/07/30/cuil-search-engine-maybe-not-so-cool-yet/)</a></p>
<p>You have to admire some clever marketing of a the product.</p>
<p>Barry Cleave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-437421</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-437421</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one who thought Cuil pretty much sucked</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one who thought Cuil pretty much sucked</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ky</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/05/cuil/#comment-437241</link>
		<dc:creator>Ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5857#comment-437241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m well aware of the excessive publicity that Cuil got when launched. So far, I can only say I&#039;m fairly disappointed after using this search engine for a while.  The results aren&#039;t as comprehensive as Google&#039;s and I too think there&#039;s room for interface improvements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m well aware of the excessive publicity that Cuil got when launched. So far, I can only say I&#8217;m fairly disappointed after using this search engine for a while.  The results aren&#8217;t as comprehensive as Google&#8217;s and I too think there&#8217;s room for interface improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
