<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Can&#8217;t I Uninstall the Microsoft .net Framework?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:48:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-439245</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-439245</guid>
		<description>&gt; To be fair Linux has its share of dependencies as well. I remember installing file manager in Ubuntu and suddenly getting A LOT of extra stuff needed for it to work. :)

true enough... Other systems are not spared. From my experience though, on Ubuntu, apt-get/dpkg makes the installing/uninstalling/dependency checks much smoother than the &quot;standard&quot; windows way of doing it. (might have changed in vista though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; To be fair Linux has its share of dependencies as well. I remember installing file manager in Ubuntu and suddenly getting A LOT of extra stuff needed for it to work. :)</p>
<p>true enough&#8230; Other systems are not spared. From my experience though, on Ubuntu, apt-get/dpkg makes the installing/uninstalling/dependency checks much smoother than the &#8220;standard&#8221; windows way of doing it. (might have changed in vista though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-439161</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-439161</guid>
		<description>&gt;sadly, it’s typical of (microsoft’s) byzantine installations and dependencies.

To be fair Linux has its share of dependencies as well. I remember installing file manager in Ubuntu and suddenly getting A LOT of extra stuff needed for it to work. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;sadly, it’s typical of (microsoft’s) byzantine installations and dependencies.</p>
<p>To be fair Linux has its share of dependencies as well. I remember installing file manager in Ubuntu and suddenly getting A LOT of extra stuff needed for it to work. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-O</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-438742</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-438742</guid>
		<description>sadly, it&#039;s typical of (microsoft&#039;s) byzantine installations and dependencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadly, it&#8217;s typical of (microsoft&#8217;s) byzantine installations and dependencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-431170</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-431170</guid>
		<description>The .Net 3.5 framework actually uses the 2.0 CLR, as well as some BCL classes for LINQ.  Requirements for 3.5 are 2.0 Framework with SP1, and the 3.0 SP1 package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .Net 3.5 framework actually uses the 2.0 CLR, as well as some BCL classes for LINQ.  Requirements for 3.5 are 2.0 Framework with SP1, and the 3.0 SP1 package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-430616</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-430616</guid>
		<description>Lewz I tested it just a few minutes ago. I uninstalled all previous versions of the Microsoft .net Framework and downloaded and installed the Microsoft .net Framework 3.5 afterward.

The Microsoft .net Framework 2 Service Pack 1 and the Microsoft .net Framework 3 Service Pack 1 were automatically installed as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lewz I tested it just a few minutes ago. I uninstalled all previous versions of the Microsoft .net Framework and downloaded and installed the Microsoft .net Framework 3.5 afterward.</p>
<p>The Microsoft .net Framework 2 Service Pack 1 and the Microsoft .net Framework 3 Service Pack 1 were automatically installed as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-430469</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-430469</guid>
		<description>Lewz Microsoft .net Framework 3.5 includes .NET Framework 2.0 service pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.0 service pack 1. 

I guess you still end up with three separate installations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lewz Microsoft .net Framework 3.5 includes .NET Framework 2.0 service pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.0 service pack 1. </p>
<p>I guess you still end up with three separate installations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewz Scruz</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/01/why-cannot-i-uninstall-the-microsoft-net-framework/#comment-430455</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewz Scruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5768#comment-430455</guid>
		<description>@Martin: i hear that the .net framework 3.0 = .net 2.0 + winfx (windows presentation foundation, windows communication foundation, etc), and .net 3.5 = .net 3.0 + language integrated query and some extensions. you cannot install .net 3.5 without the previous two, as they both depend on it. hope this explains things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martin: i hear that the .net framework 3.0 = .net 2.0 + winfx (windows presentation foundation, windows communication foundation, etc), and .net 3.5 = .net 3.0 + language integrated query and some extensions. you cannot install .net 3.5 without the previous two, as they both depend on it. hope this explains things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
