<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype Backdoor Speculations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/24/skype-backdoor-speculations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/24/skype-backdoor-speculations/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:06:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One Shot Design :: Skype for iPhone is bad news for network carriers</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/24/skype-backdoor-speculations/#comment-704209</link>
		<dc:creator>One Shot Design :: Skype for iPhone is bad news for network carriers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5571#comment-704209</guid>
		<description>[...] 1: Reports do suggest that in 2006 Skype agreed to implement keyword filters to be allowed by authorities to run services in China. Several Western governments are talking about attempts to crack down the encryption or simply putting pressure to allow wiretapping; and the proprietary nature of Skype software does fuel suspicion over some sort of backdoor access. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1: Reports do suggest that in 2006 Skype agreed to implement keyword filters to be allowed by authorities to run services in China. Several Western governments are talking about attempts to crack down the encryption or simply putting pressure to allow wiretapping; and the proprietary nature of Skype software does fuel suspicion over some sort of backdoor access. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
