<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assign Applications to CPU Cores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:21:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/#comment-450869</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-450869</guid>
		<description>It has been already said that the OS assigns the affinity.
WMVideo gets 2 CPU&#039;s by default but WMEncoder reported as using 2 CPU&#039;s gets only one. If you assign the second CPU it makes no difference in how WME runs.
The load remains at 50-54%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been already said that the OS assigns the affinity.<br />
WMVideo gets 2 CPU&#8217;s by default but WMEncoder reported as using 2 CPU&#8217;s gets only one. If you assign the second CPU it makes no difference in how WME runs.<br />
The load remains at 50-54%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/#comment-420267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-420267</guid>
		<description>@Wombie - Didn&#039;t even know that!  

I also have a program called TaskInfo which I have used for years.  Has the same functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wombie &#8211; Didn&#8217;t even know that!  </p>
<p>I also have a program called TaskInfo which I have used for years.  Has the same functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Womble</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/#comment-419857</link>
		<dc:creator>Womble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-419857</guid>
		<description>Right click a process in task manager choose &quot;Set Affinity&quot; Why use a seperate app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right click a process in task manager choose &#8220;Set Affinity&#8221; Why use a seperate app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jojo</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/#comment-419448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-419448</guid>
		<description>Not completely true anonymous.  Maybe this is a problem for the average PC user.  But large IBM compatible mainframes have given the performance analyst the ability to segregate applications on specific CPU&#039;s for many years.  These systems also allow the user to allocate CPU cycles and divide workloads among virtual OS images.  It&#039;s called workload balancing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not completely true anonymous.  Maybe this is a problem for the average PC user.  But large IBM compatible mainframes have given the performance analyst the ability to segregate applications on specific CPU&#8217;s for many years.  These systems also allow the user to allocate CPU cycles and divide workloads among virtual OS images.  It&#8217;s called workload balancing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/#comment-418865</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-418865</guid>
		<description>no .. its not valid .. this is done by the OS automatically ... and you are NOT smarter than the OS. . NO! NOT! NADA!

if you assign 1 application to 1 core and the application goes to do I/O, your core is being wasted ... trust me you want the OS to do this all ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no .. its not valid .. this is done by the OS automatically &#8230; and you are NOT smarter than the OS. . NO! NOT! NADA!</p>
<p>if you assign 1 application to 1 core and the application goes to do I/O, your core is being wasted &#8230; trust me you want the OS to do this all ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qbix</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/#comment-418262</link>
		<dc:creator>qbix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-418262</guid>
		<description>It also comes in handy with a lot of games that crash on multicore setups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also comes in handy with a lot of games that crash on multicore setups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
