<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Assign Applications to CPU Cores</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Carlos</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/comment-page-1/#comment-450869</link> <dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-450869</guid> <description>It has been already said that the OS assigns the affinity.
WMVideo gets 2 CPU&#039;s by default but WMEncoder reported as using 2 CPU&#039;s gets only one. If you assign the second CPU it makes no difference in how WME runs.
The load remains at 50-54%.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been already said that the OS assigns the affinity.<br
/> WMVideo gets 2 CPU&#8217;s by default but WMEncoder reported as using 2 CPU&#8217;s gets only one. If you assign the second CPU it makes no difference in how WME runs.<br
/> The load remains at 50-54%.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jojo</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/comment-page-1/#comment-420267</link> <dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-420267</guid> <description>@Wombie - Didn&#039;t even know that!
I also have a program called TaskInfo which I have used for years.  Has the same functionality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wombie &#8211; Didn&#8217;t even know that!</p><p>I also have a program called TaskInfo which I have used for years.  Has the same functionality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Womble</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/comment-page-1/#comment-419857</link> <dc:creator>Womble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-419857</guid> <description>Right click a process in task manager choose &quot;Set Affinity&quot; Why use a seperate app?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right click a process in task manager choose &#8220;Set Affinity&#8221; Why use a seperate app?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jojo</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/comment-page-1/#comment-419448</link> <dc:creator>Jojo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:56:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-419448</guid> <description>Not completely true anonymous.  Maybe this is a problem for the average PC user.  But large IBM compatible mainframes have given the performance analyst the ability to segregate applications on specific CPU&#039;s for many years.  These systems also allow the user to allocate CPU cycles and divide workloads among virtual OS images.  It&#039;s called workload balancing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not completely true anonymous.  Maybe this is a problem for the average PC user.  But large IBM compatible mainframes have given the performance analyst the ability to segregate applications on specific CPU&#8217;s for many years.  These systems also allow the user to allocate CPU cycles and divide workloads among virtual OS images.  It&#8217;s called workload balancing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anonymous</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/comment-page-1/#comment-418865</link> <dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-418865</guid> <description>no .. its not valid .. this is done by the OS automatically ... and you are NOT smarter than the OS. . NO! NOT! NADA!
if you assign 1 application to 1 core and the application goes to do I/O, your core is being wasted ... trust me you want the OS to do this all ..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no .. its not valid .. this is done by the OS automatically &#8230; and you are NOT smarter than the OS. . NO! NOT! NADA!</p><p>if you assign 1 application to 1 core and the application goes to do I/O, your core is being wasted &#8230; trust me you want the OS to do this all ..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: qbix</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/23/assign-applications-to-cpu-cores/comment-page-1/#comment-418262</link> <dc:creator>qbix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:44:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5528#comment-418262</guid> <description>It also comes in handy with a lot of games that crash on multicore setups.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also comes in handy with a lot of games that crash on multicore setups.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
