6 Users Commented In This Post

Subscribe To This Post Comment Rss Or TrackBack URL
David Bradley says, June 26th, 2008   

Nice find. So often there are issues with movie playback and editing even. However, I think VLC, with its essentially inbuilt codecs, gets around most of those issues without one having to worry about which codecs pack is installed. Windows Media Player is a different matter, of course, it perpetually calling home like an immature child on a gap year trip with no friends.

Martin says, June 26th, 2008   

David yes I also prefer players that come with their own codecs but one should make sure to update them regularly.

Switched from VLC to SMPlayer a while ago though and never looked back.

David Bradley says, June 26th, 2008   

I’ll check out SMPlayer…what are its advantages over VLC?

Martin says, June 26th, 2008   

David the reason why I primarily switched was because I encountered strange errors with VLC. The only difference that I can see right now is the support of Real Media files out of the box in SMPlayer.

SMPlayer is also using less resources than VLC. A quick check on a 500 Megabyte video revealed that SMPlayer was using 14 Megabytes of RAM and 6 Megabytes of Virtual Memory while VLC was using 40 Megabytes of RAM and 40 Megabytes of Virtual Memory.

David Bradley says, June 26th, 2008   

They sound like good enough reasons to switch to me…

Windows: InstalledCodec, que codecs hay instalados en tu equipo - Bitelia says, June 26th, 2008   

[...] InstalledCodec | Vía: GHacks . ← Anterior | Inicio Comparte esta anotación [...]

Leave Your Comments Below
Hello, please leave your thought below

Please Note: Each comment will be manually approved by an admin. There is no guarantee that a comment will be posted. Please do not submit the comment multiple times.