Normally users check video files and their required codecs to make sure the file plays properly on their system. But there are some users – including myself – who want to know the codecs that are installed on a system. This is useful for compatibility and playback reasons, for example to make sure that a video is always using a specific codec for playback.
Installed Codec (via Shell Extension City) is another fine NirSoft tool that displays all installed codecs of a Windows 2000, 2003, XP or Vista system in a table. All meaning all Codec drivers and DirectShow but not binary codecs which are used by some applications like MPlayer.
The software lists the name of the codec, its installation path and file, the company that developed it and if it is enabled on the system. Each codec in the list can be disabled which has the effect that this codec will not be used to play the supported multimedia files. Excellent if you want to make sure that a specific codec is playing certain videos.
Removing some of the installed codecs can be achieved by disabling the codecs first and checking if the videos still play fine. If that is the case I would temporarily move them to another directory and if nothing bad happens delete them from the system. Most of the codecs installed on my Windows XP system are from Nero 8 which is kinda strange because I have not installed all those additional converters and tools that come with it. The codecs seem to get installed nevertheless.
Related posts:
List all installed multimedia codecsWhich Codecs do I have installed ?
Display And Test Video Codecs
Check for and add missing Video Codecs
SMPlayer Uncommon Codecs Package
6 Responses to “Display The Installed Codecs On A System”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
-
[...] InstalledCodec | Vía: GHacks . ← Anterior | Inicio Comparte esta anotación [...]
Nice find. So often there are issues with movie playback and editing even. However, I think VLC, with its essentially inbuilt codecs, gets around most of those issues without one having to worry about which codecs pack is installed. Windows Media Player is a different matter, of course, it perpetually calling home like an immature child on a gap year trip with no friends.
David yes I also prefer players that come with their own codecs but one should make sure to update them regularly.
Switched from VLC to SMPlayer a while ago though and never looked back.
I’ll check out SMPlayer…what are its advantages over VLC?
David the reason why I primarily switched was because I encountered strange errors with VLC. The only difference that I can see right now is the support of Real Media files out of the box in SMPlayer.
SMPlayer is also using less resources than VLC. A quick check on a 500 Megabyte video revealed that SMPlayer was using 14 Megabytes of RAM and 6 Megabytes of Virtual Memory while VLC was using 40 Megabytes of RAM and 40 Megabytes of Virtual Memory.
They sound like good enough reasons to switch to me…