<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Acrobat.com Online</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/23/acrobatcom-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/23/acrobatcom-online/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: eDeskOnline</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/23/acrobatcom-online/comment-page-1/#comment-383410</link> <dc:creator>eDeskOnline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:28:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5086#comment-383410</guid> <description>Well, now even Adobe has entered into the race with other players in the online office suite race. I&#039;m not sure on how much I can really depend on this suite since it&#039;s so flash heavy needs to be downloaded. Another thing is the productivity level. While new office suites like &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.edeskonline.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eDeskOnline&lt;/a&gt;, being readily available I&#039;d personally rather use the above mentioned office suite than use Adobe&#039;s flash dependent online office...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now even Adobe has entered into the race with other players in the online office suite race. I&#8217;m not sure on how much I can really depend on this suite since it&#8217;s so flash heavy needs to be downloaded. Another thing is the productivity level. While new office suites like <a
href='http://www.edeskonline.com' rel="nofollow">eDeskOnline</a>, being readily available I&#8217;d personally rather use the above mentioned office suite than use Adobe&#8217;s flash dependent online office&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
