Why I’m not switching to Firefox 3 just yet

>Especially since much of the data is now stored in database format instead of simple text files, many of the extensions can’t work.

For some people if they have SQL - every problem looks like database.

It’s a pity that plain-text solutions seem to be considered kinda non-geek.

I’m using Firefox 3 right now, and I don’t notice anything wrong with it. The trick is to remain “browser-independent”: I don’t install more than 5-10 extensions on Firefox and I use Opera and Safari as well.
Just don’t get addicted to extensions (stumbleupon and del.icio.us are the worst), and everything will be fine…

Here’e another reason why I’ve reverted back.

http://techbold.com/2008/06/firefox-3-already-vulnerable-to-security-threats/

Ah wait, let me clear things up. I have no problem with storing stuff in databases, or text files. I like the way the FF3 handles these things, but I have no problem with either solutions.

But, since plugins were developed for the non database format they no longer work if they are not upgraded.

I jumped in like a lot of other idiots did too, except I immediately uninstalled FF3 when 90+% of my 60+ add-ons weren’t working. Hell, even my theme didn’t work, and yes, I did try those 2 about:config changes.

Maybe there were other ways to get them working, but my time was better spent uninstalling it and going with what I know works with my add-ons: 2.0.0.14.

I’d happily live with Opera’s speedier browser, but I hate those cookies that Spybot tells me about from them everytime. Maybe I’m just too ignorant on Opera right now, but I sure don’t here anything about lots of add-ons coming from them either.

So, my XP Pro box stays with IE6 for my wife who hates FF just because, and I use it for testing along with IE7 Standalone, but the default is of course, still FF. From all the changes I’ve heard about - including search suggestions based on your browser history (which is the first thing I turn off anyway) with some new Awesome Bar - doesn’t sound so awesome to me at all. It’s a shame too, because I’ve been with FF religiously since my first day back in early ‘05.

I also use Safari for my Pandora listening, since I regularly recycle FF after heavy usage and then quickly run CC from a quick launch icon, and it luckily finishes before FF even opens so it’s no big deal, and just works!

I’ve heard about the security problem, but since it was also in FF2 as far as I know…

I agree with you Fabio, I also only use about 3-5 extensions.

I was quite happy to use Firefox 3 from beta. The lack of extensions was quite refreshing - it let me decide what addons I needed and what were just wasting resource.

Of course, you could always try forcing your extensions to run:
http://lifehacker.com/355973/make-your-extensions-work-with-the-firefox-3-beta

To be honest, if your favourite extensions haven’t been updated to Fx3 by now, they’re either never going to be unless someone else picks up the project or they add functionality that cannot work in the new version… Firefox 3 has been in alpha/beta for so long now pretty much every add-on should have been tweaked by now. I have about 25 extensions installed, a lot of which were not updated for Firefox 3 but still work if marked as compatible with the Nightly Tester Tools extension.

Out of interest, which ones have broken for you? Have you checked the authors homepages as well as the Mozilla repository? There’s sometimes quite a version lag.

Before you start thrashing a program, I’d suggest you at least give it a try - you said you haven’t even tried the final release version! …if it’s that you don’t yet want to *install* it, I might suggest Firefox Portable: http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable

Please be careful, author. This article indirectly implies that somehow Firefox 3 is *bad,* just because 20-30 extensions aren’t being released every day, and that some of our familiar favorites don’t yet all work. Allot of people put a great deal of work into making a new, more powerful tool for you and everyone else to use, and AT ABSOLUTELY NO COST!

The reality is that sometimes to move forward, as we learn from our past, we must try new things. Since those horizons are new, they can be unfamiliar and a bit bumpy - but this is where greatness comes from!

Yes, I am a Firefox fan, but that isn’t relevant here - my comments could be applied to any similar situation. As a reader, I’m excited to see new opinions, but please let those be well thoguht out, *informed* opinions! Come on, Ghacks, get back to the quality that I know and love!

@ Vikas:

As some other readers have pointed out, please know that the security issue that you are referring to is NOT unique to Firefox 3, it is also present in 2.x. Regressing to 2.x does NOT make that issue go away.

I would imagine that Mozilla will be releasing an update very soon.

Every one of my extensions worked on release day..

Moose, you are spot on with your comments, completely agree with you. The authors of most of these extensions have had the last 6 months to get new versions ready and out - if they haven’t then there is a good chance those extensions are already dead and unsupported.

As mentioned above, Firefox 2 Portable can be run on your hard drive independent of Fx 2. You can use that as your testing ground. My only essential extension not yet updated for Fx 3 is Tab Mix Plus and even that one has nighties available which work just fine. And in my testing, leading to the upgrade, I discovered extensions to replace the one not yet updated. For instance, Digger replaced Uppity and Extension List Dumper replaced InfoLister.

This is what I said last week on one of your FF3 posts - that I would wait until everything got a bit more settled before making the switch.

As to extensions, I have about 60 installed (and of course to my mind, they are all essential at some point or another), otherwise, why would keep them installed?

It would be nice if Mozilla would provide a list (updated daily) of the current status of all extant extensions as to compatibility with FF3. I want to see if compatible now, dead or alive, and anticipated compatibility date.

I am sorry I moved so quickly. Even though only one of my extensions is not updated (Tab mix plus), the regular crashes without me even touching an input device has me frustrated.

At first i had the same feelings as you, however more extensions are updated everyday to FF3 compatible, hence they will be updated sooner or later so just bear with it for a while.

Im currently waiting for 6 exts right now. esp swifttabs.

There were a few add-ons that didn’t work for me when I installed Firefox 3 (final), but it wasn’t a problem. Like someone else said, it made me think about the add-ons I used and didn’t use. I currently have:

Adblock Plus
ChromeEdit Plus
Flashblock
New Tab Button on Tab Right
Nuke Anything Enhanced
QuickDrag
Show Picture
TinyUrl Creator

The benefits outweigh an extension or two that don’t work just yet.

>Please be careful, author. This article indirectly implies that somehow Firefox 3 is *bad,*

Really? I think it doesn’t and I am far from Firefox fan.

>Allot of people put a great deal of work into making a new, more powerful tool for you and everyone else to use, and AT ABSOLUTELY NO COST!

And those people are making very nice money while at it. It’s hardly self-sacrifice.

>As a reader, I’m excited to see new opinions, but please let those be well thoguht out, *informed* opinions!

Any opinion is fine as long as it praises Firefox.
—-

On topic I wanted to add that it’s really not open-closed source issue… It’s more of open-closed system issue.

Firefox is a mix of open possibilities through extension systems and “closed” core. Yes, it’s open source bla-bla-bla but it’s not like end user has a lot of influence over it. Try to make your own fork and suddenly you are crossing trademarks and need to change everything so none except geeks would be able recognize it as Firefox fork.

Radically change core plugin framework in commercial app and your customers will bite your head off. But open source project can get away with it easily on “they are working for free” excuse. Except that “free” part is usually very untrue for big projects.

I always considered extensions main “selling” point of Firefox. I think developers had their reasons but it’s still very weird to see that system slightly broken.

I find it laughable that some of you aren’t installing Firefox 3.0 just because some add-ons aren’t working. Did you guys even try upgrading the incompatible add-on’s max version number either manually or via MR Tech tools add-on?

I have 21 add-ons installed and running just fine in Firefox 3.

[...] told everyone yesterday why he would wait another month or so before he would make the switch from Firefox 2 to Firefox 3 and I thought I share my Firefox 3 switching experience with everyone. [...]

Add-ons not working is as good a reason as any to upgrade, it gives you the chance to strip down your install to the bare essentials.

You people just don’t get it - I use FF specifically because of the add-ons I choose. The FACT that 60+ of mine didn’t work left me no reason to keep using what to me is an inferior product vs. FF2.

Just because your add-ons work has absolutely nothing to do with mine, unless they were the same, and apparently, they aren’t.

I also said that I tried the ‘force’ tweak, and no it didn’t work for me on my box. You do know no 2 boxes are the same, right?

As to ‘if they don’t work by now, they prolly never will’, well I guess I’ll just be sticking with what’s good for me then: 2.0.0.14.

It’s funny how I had to dig around for that sucker too after I blindly immediately deleted the earlier version upon dl’ing FF3, but you can bet I won’t be making that mistake again with any software.

First it was M$, then Google and their shenanigans, and now it’s Mozilla and their millions from Google. Man, if lightening speed Opera ever had the plugins I use with FF, I’d be so gone from Mozilla’s open-source, closed core software (nice call Rarst!).

“You people just don’t get it” - such a pleasant tone to take, BillyG. “You people”, indeed…

btw: Has FF3 really fixed the memory issues recognized in earlier versions?

“You people…” - That all-too-familiar arrogant opener.

Hard to say about the memory issues; Firefox still gets up around the 90-100MB mark, but I think that’s to be expected with six or more tabs open, and after several hours browsing.

It’s quite easy to make Firefox release its grip on memory, apply the hack and then when you feel it’s getting out of control, simply minimize it.

Sounds like those “Internet speed boosters” we used to hear about years and years ago, which did very little to nothing to improve performance. But hey, if it works for you, go for it!

I guess it is in a way (you still see those ads in UK newspapers, by the way), but if you’re working in Firefox and want to fire up Photoshop at the same time, it’s quite handy to be able to release that chunk of memory, while PS grinds up to speed.

I have upgraded to 3 beta because the Firebugs addon is WAY better than the previous versions.

Well that’s me, I’m the kinda guy that installs beta versions onto production servers :0

hehehe

I like FF3, and got all my add-ons working again. However, I only have ONE concern… although I love the new awesome location bar, it calls up history from secure sites as well! So if you use gmail which is on https , anyone that uses that computer after you can see the subjects of every single email you typed. Yes, they can’t access it (if you logged out) but they can still view the subjects of the email in history. This to me is quite a serious security concern.

There must be a way you can at least quickly switch off the location bar’s ability to call up history if you e.g. visit an internet cafe.

Ever since I got Firefox 3, I’ve been getting SO many internet crashes that I can’t even count.