<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glassdoor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:16:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TimA</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/#comment-382614</link>
		<dc:creator>TimA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5073#comment-382614</guid>
		<description>Hi Joshua -

TimA from Glassdoor.com here. Thanks for checking out the site and helpful feedback.

I&#039;m glad you noted the balanced contributing as that&#039;s been a huge goal for us.  We don&#039;t want to become a rant site but instead want to create a place where people can share contructive feedback about their workplaces and senior management. In fact, we require people who post a review to provide **pros** **cons** to help keep the comments in check.  The reality is: even if you hate your job, there are some redeeming qualities that we want shared with the community.

We think people are finding value in our &quot;give to get&quot; model because they can first preview the quality and thoughtfulness of reviews for our four sneak peek companies.  They&#039;re seeing how valuable candid feedback is and are more inclined to give it themselves.

Also, on CEO ratings - I want to point out the numbers you reference are overall company ratings (3.9 for Microsoft and 4.1 for Google)  The CEO approval ratings are actually 53% approval for Ballmer and 86% approval for Schmidt - so a pretty significant difference.  We realize this is somewhat confusing and will be working to make this more clear.

Thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joshua -</p>
<p>TimA from Glassdoor.com here. Thanks for checking out the site and helpful feedback.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you noted the balanced contributing as that&#8217;s been a huge goal for us.  We don&#8217;t want to become a rant site but instead want to create a place where people can share contructive feedback about their workplaces and senior management. In fact, we require people who post a review to provide **pros** **cons** to help keep the comments in check.  The reality is: even if you hate your job, there are some redeeming qualities that we want shared with the community.</p>
<p>We think people are finding value in our &#8220;give to get&#8221; model because they can first preview the quality and thoughtfulness of reviews for our four sneak peek companies.  They&#8217;re seeing how valuable candid feedback is and are more inclined to give it themselves.</p>
<p>Also, on CEO ratings &#8211; I want to point out the numbers you reference are overall company ratings (3.9 for Microsoft and 4.1 for Google)  The CEO approval ratings are actually 53% approval for Ballmer and 86% approval for Schmidt &#8211; so a pretty significant difference.  We realize this is somewhat confusing and will be working to make this more clear.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/#comment-380556</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5073#comment-380556</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s a good one, but I found another www.pingmycompany.com that sounds more interractive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s a good one, but I found another <a href="http://www.pingmycompany.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pingmycompany.com</a> that sounds more interractive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
