<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Glassdoor</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: TimA</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/comment-page-1/#comment-382614</link> <dc:creator>TimA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:54:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5073#comment-382614</guid> <description>Hi Joshua -
TimA from Glassdoor.com here. Thanks for checking out the site and helpful feedback.
I&#039;m glad you noted the balanced contributing as that&#039;s been a huge goal for us.  We don&#039;t want to become a rant site but instead want to create a place where people can share contructive feedback about their workplaces and senior management. In fact, we require people who post a review to provide **pros** **cons** to help keep the comments in check.  The reality is: even if you hate your job, there are some redeeming qualities that we want shared with the community.
We think people are finding value in our &quot;give to get&quot; model because they can first preview the quality and thoughtfulness of reviews for our four sneak peek companies.  They&#039;re seeing how valuable candid feedback is and are more inclined to give it themselves.
Also, on CEO ratings - I want to point out the numbers you reference are overall company ratings (3.9 for Microsoft and 4.1 for Google)  The CEO approval ratings are actually 53% approval for Ballmer and 86% approval for Schmidt - so a pretty significant difference.  We realize this is somewhat confusing and will be working to make this more clear.
Thanks for the comments.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joshua -</p><p>TimA from Glassdoor.com here. Thanks for checking out the site and helpful feedback.</p><p>I&#8217;m glad you noted the balanced contributing as that&#8217;s been a huge goal for us.  We don&#8217;t want to become a rant site but instead want to create a place where people can share contructive feedback about their workplaces and senior management. In fact, we require people who post a review to provide **pros** **cons** to help keep the comments in check.  The reality is: even if you hate your job, there are some redeeming qualities that we want shared with the community.</p><p>We think people are finding value in our &#8220;give to get&#8221; model because they can first preview the quality and thoughtfulness of reviews for our four sneak peek companies.  They&#8217;re seeing how valuable candid feedback is and are more inclined to give it themselves.</p><p>Also, on CEO ratings &#8211; I want to point out the numbers you reference are overall company ratings (3.9 for Microsoft and 4.1 for Google)  The CEO approval ratings are actually 53% approval for Ballmer and 86% approval for Schmidt &#8211; so a pretty significant difference.  We realize this is somewhat confusing and will be working to make this more clear.</p><p>Thanks for the comments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Justin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/glassdoor/comment-page-1/#comment-380556</link> <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:50:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5073#comment-380556</guid> <description>Yeah, it&#039;s a good one, but I found another www.pingmycompany.com that sounds more interractive</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s a good one, but I found another www.pingmycompany.com that sounds more interractive</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
